• Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re telling me the company that once had ads for T-Mobile and Volkswagen and now almost exclusively has ads where random bots with NFT photos advertise ChatGPT ‘services’ isn’t doing well financially??

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s important to note that “doing well financially” isn’t just revenue and user count, it’s also expenditures. If Twitter has managed to cut costs by more than whatever its income has dropped by then that could well be a good outcome for it, I’ve heard it wasn’t profitable when Musk took it over.

      It’s kind of ironic how big companies are frequently criticized for fixating on “endless growth” and “line goes up”, and then when a company or organization sheds that it also looks bad.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There’s so much wrong with your understanding here…so I’ll just point out that you’re talking about Twitter as if it’s still a public company, it’s not.

        Also, Twitter was never profitable, and it was likely never going to be profitable. But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

          Which are?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If “lines goes up” meant things get better for the customers, the employees, and the world in general, then people would be cheering it on. Usually it means it gets worse for at LEAST one of the three, and sometimes all 3.

        Here, “line goes down” is following Twitter getting worse for the customers, the users, the employees, and the world in general. So people will cheer as it crashes.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Twitter has 1.3 Billion / in interest payments alone as it took on $13,000,000,000 in debt for the honor of being bought out by Elon Musk.

        The owners of that debt have been quaking in their boots all last year. As Bankruptcy proceedings would make them the new owner of Twitter.

        Note that Twitter made $5 Billion revenue on its best year, and that’s likely halfed or worse.

        EDIT: $5 Billion revenue on its best year. Far less today and you still have all the OTHER costs going on. I’m sure Elon will prop up Twitter with Tesla ads or something but Twitter cannot stand by itself anymore.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I thought Twitter’s infrastructure was going to collapse within weeks after Musk made all those cuts and changes. I was obviously wrong because Twitter’s infrastructure didn’t collapse. I’m not speaking to the user experience on Twitter but from a purely infrastructure perspective, Musk was right and I was wrong.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Uh-oh, you said something positive about Musk. I only said “maybe he’s not as bad as it seems” and look where that got me.

            • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              10 months ago

              yeah. no that’s whistleblowers. you ever notice how every major whistleblower gets hit with a child porn charge? It’s like a label that reads “the government doesn’t think you should talk about this guy”. Nothing more than character assassination by our government. Ridiculous to suggest that someone used to being that furtive about something so shameful would also just want the world to know the truth.

              those two things don’t fit together, and yet it keeps happening. weird

              • SheeEttin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I have not noticed this. Some of the most high-profile ones, recently Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, and Reality Winner have not even received allegations, to my knowledge. Nor historically, with Daniel Ellsberg or Mark “Deep Throat” Felt. The only instance I can think of is Julian Assange’s rape charges, which seemed to have merit.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Or people with morbid curiousity like me who hop on to see the dumpster fire occasionally. Can’t say I recommend it.

          • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Damn, I thought it was a requirement to shit post on Twitter while you’re shitty code compiles. How am I supposed to become a real programmer now? I guess I still got mastodon.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He kept the 70% he wanted, it’ll be a propaganda engine and communications platform for the right wing.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Whatever wing willing to pay, honestly.

        EDIT: I rarely see the voting system of lemmy for a reason. I find it cute, this reaction to the mere comparison between so-called “wings” in the American political system. Both, republicans and democrats, are two sides of the same coin.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Strategic alignment. Getting his taxes cut counts. Of course, could be some deeper conspiracy. I’m not so anto- conspiracy that I don’t think people aren’t making grand plans to install trump.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have a lot of friends that won’t quit because of sports updates and all the shitposts

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is in addition to the first year of losses, which are likely higher.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are a lot of quasi-celebrity types with a big following that don’t want to give up their follower base.

    • Emmy@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ll bet it’s more than 30% left but bots backfilled the space.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    How much did human usage drop? Because there are a shitload more bots on twitter nowadays than there were in the years before he took over.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Any time something gets too big it gets bots. Lemmy will be the same. We will see instances getting defederated who cannot manage the spam.

      Fuck Elon though

      • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If people set up their own instances with 100% LLM bots how would we even know they are bots to defederate? The AIs are too realistic. Only giveaway would be the ones dumb enough to make accounts post/comment 24/7 with seconds between each comment.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          I imagine the content would be bad, which is the whole reason an instance would become defederated.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right now, it’s still possible to realize texts are written by llms, due to style and mistakes, but it can become a serious problem in the near future, and we are kind of ignoring it, because no one is preparing in any way.

          • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It will take someone really smart to figure this out without requiring some form of identity confirmation (which would be horrible imo), like using credit cards or (even worse) government digital IDs (I live in a country where we have a gov ID app which can be used to sign documents and confirm ID online but if I had to use it on Lemmy or any other social media I’d just fuck off).

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Any time something gets too big it gets bots

        Dead internet theory, summed up in a sentence

    • Hypx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I suspect even more than 30%, and by a lot. Nearly all of the communities that once thrived seem to be dead. It feels very empty.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wasn’t like one of his focuses going to be getting rid of bots? Did they just not do anything and the bots just invaded or did the bots just get better?

      • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        10 months ago

        He got rid of like 80% of the staff. I doubt he has a functional team who can even tackle the problem.

      • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the focus on bots was primarily used in an attempt to back out of the deal. It was never an issue, especially if it inflated his ego by pumping up his account.

  • Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ever since Musk’s control of the company, Twitter (I refused to call it X) showed me multiple hate and racists posts. Basically, Twitter is showing me garbage. I now use Mastadon instead.

    • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I was never active in terms of posting but I followed several news outlets, local government agencies, and a few friends. Shortly after Musk took over I saw nothing but right wing nutjobs and a lot of posts from Musk. I tried unfollowing but nothing worked so I quit logging in. I need to cancel my account but haven’t taken the time.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I had a Twitter account but rarely used it. Shortly after Musk took over, his account was in recommendations and his tweets were in my feed, even though I’d NEVER seen them before.

        I blocked him.

        He remained at the top of my recommendations.

        I think I even occasionally saw his posts when they were retweeted or something by someone I didn’t even follow, because the retweet was trending, I guess?

        That’s when I deleted my account.

        • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a shame because Twitter is a perfect platform for the kind of one-way communications required by a news agency or local government agency. Maybe Mastodon or Bluesky will fill that void.

            • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So would I but good luck getting your average local sheriff or office of emergency preparedness to use RSS. Most of their “IT” staff is the deputy who is “good with computers” meaning they can open a PDF file.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Facebook does that for me too, alongside flat earthers, anti EV crap and the occasional funny picture. It’s depressing.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh yeah, the flat earthers, the pictures with lens flare on it being proof of “planet X” and other insanity? The best comedy I’ve ever seen.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 months ago

    Needing to log in to view someones tweets means now I wont even visit the site when linked. Kinda the number 1 rule of platforms is to make them accessible to those that don’t already use it, so as to convert them later. Musk, and everyone around him letting these decisions run through, are idiots

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      ran into this last night.

      I hate twitter, but there was something I was trying to see and the only way to get the info was from a twitter post. Couldnt view the goddamn twitter post without creating an account and logging in.

      My immediate thought was “This isnt important enough for this bullshit” and immediately gave up.

      I’m convinced this login to view shit is to hide the explosion of right wing white supremacy/racism/etc posts and the bots echoing and amplifying it from people before they commit themselves to an account.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Login to view started before Musk took over, FYI. I distinctly remember avoiding Twitter to spite them in those days.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It did. I don’t remember when, but Twitter was getting hard and harder to access without an account before Musk. It might have been one of those Rolling Release things so everyone didn’t notice at once or something.

            In the beginning, Twitter even had an RSS feed for accounts you could subscribe to. When it shifted to nagging be for login, I installed a nitter addon and that that’s broken, I haven’t been there since.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Quite a few Tumblr refugees still I’d imagine. Shame mastodon and Lemmy weren’t ready yet back then.

        Also twitter is still one of the biggest platforms for sharing art in general, if you want the large audience, you kinda have to be there.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I wrote this right as the first elon buying Twitter mentions were popping up…

    Notably, Twitter facilitated communication during the arab spring, where the people organized to stand against and even overthrow several broken and corrupt government regimes throughout the middle east - including some participation in places like Saudi Arabia, for example.

    Twitter’s second largest investor after a musk takeover… the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it’s de facto leader who, among other things, killed and dismembered an American journalist without consequence somewhat recently.

    And now Twitter is about to be killed… and dismembered.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      X is one of his older websites, a financial platform that he created after his first startup was sold. Name comes from “X marks the spot” from old treasure maps, was to be the place for all transactions.

      It struggled and didn’t really get off the ground, but was able to merge with another platform called Confinity, run by Peter Thiel. The merged platforms then became PayPal, and made both guys rich as shit. Thiel eventually power played Musk and got him kicked out of the company, arguably for good reason, though Thiel is quite a piece of work, too.

      The new X is Musk’s attempt to make twitter more like his old site, and is why he was throwing around things like making it a peer to peer payment site, similar to WeChat / WePay or Venmo. How he plans to make tweets into bank transfers I’ve got no idea, esp. when losing 30 percent of users.

      More on this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2024/01/09/x-announces-peer-to-peer-payment-service-will-launch-in-2024/?sh=62ee775a75a8

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Pretty much he wants to turn X/Twitter as WeChat’s clone for the West.

        As WeChat is both a messaging and payment app used by a couple of hundreds of millions of users in China where people can send money, split bills, pay, etc. using the app.

        Visa and MasterCard are extremely profitable companies enjoying really high margins and having very little competition. And this is very lucrative business:

        66% operating profit margin for Visa and 55% for Mastercard (four-year average). 51% net profit margin for Visa and 45% for Mastercard (four-year average). 50% per annum return on capital employed for Mastercard and 21% per annum for Visa (11-year average).

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s his favorite letter or something. He’d wanted to name something X for a while. The closest he got before was SpaceX. Which I suppose now retroactively means SpaceTwitter.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      A robot created by Dr. Light with the capacity to reason and make decisions on his own, unbound by the laws of robotics. Could also stick to walls.

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m sure a lot of the original population has dropped by a lot more than that, but in numbers they would have been replaced by an influx of fascists and bots.

      • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m taking note of all the prominent individuals and organizations which chose to remain on the fascist platform and thus implicitly support it.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This article is a survey of Americans, not a computerized search.

        Unless a number of bots answered the telephone survey, I think the stats here are legit.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    I deleted my account and haven’t missed it at all. Then again I was never good at making use of Twitter, it’s too hectic and disorganized for me, and I have the same problem with mastodon.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m glad I’m not the only person that doesn’t really understand the whole Thing behind Twitter / Mastodon feed thing.