• PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    It was not ‘pictures of monkeys’ it was art. It was digital art. If you don’t get that then you don’t understand money laundering.

    • tyler
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can’t money launder with bitcoin. The whole purpose is that everything is traceable.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago
        1. Joe gives Kevin $1mil worth of Cocaine.
        2. Joe draws an ape in MS paint.
        3. Kevin buys the digital ape drawing from Joe for $1mil in Bitcoin.

        That is how you launder money with art and Bitcoin.

        • Buttons
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because it’s normally suspicious if someone gives $1mil for no reason, but if you know it’s for a monkey jpeg, then it’s normal.

          • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            I have no idea if it attracted the attention of any regulatory body but yeah that’s pretty much how it went down as far as I know

        • tyler
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s not how it goes. Laundering works because you don’t have to report the sale, you just have to report the income. If you can track the sale then laundering never will work.