For me it’s quantum computing - especially considering its impact on most current encryption methods

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      At that point, scientists might as well invent a way to produce concentrated nutrients.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          How would that work? Surely one periodic table chemical couldn’t singlehandedly convert itself into all the nutrients the body needs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            You’re right, you can’t. You need some additional stuff. Plants takes both CO2 from the air but they also need for instance nitrogen from the ground. Now, of course 80% of air is nitrogen but it’s bound up in an extremely stable state that plants can’t really use. It takes too much energy to break the bond. If we could find some way to extract nitrogen cheaply from air though, it would be a real game changer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                Well plants do other stuff than only produce food, so I guess the idea is that it might be possible to produce food more efficiently than a plant does, which isn’t that far-fetched.

                So it’s not “don’t eat plants” as much as “look, we made this bacteria that can produce a vegetable-soup with slightly more calories per energy input than a carrot”.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        But then I want those drip-on perfect-emulation flavor drops from Shadowrun with my Nutrisoy!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      honestly, just give me a sumptuous bean burger. I only eat kebabs because they’re cheap and available, not because I crave meat like a vampire

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    592 months ago

    Anything decentralized and open source.

    I’m really excited at the improvements made to gnome-mobile.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      self hosted services that automatically and safely scale to global p2p services is about to happen

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Any information about any of those things? I’m quite interested!

        I’m the creator of a network protocol (and working implementation :-) that is based on self hosted nodes, that let’s you share/link to whatever data, say a html page, a video etc. Encrypted, overshared (so your node doesn’t need to be up for your data to be accessible), and decentralised. Based on reciprocal sharing so no money or luck involved.

        I’m being bad at promoting it would be an understatement, I would love just contributing to all this obviously coming decentralised sharing.

        Cheers

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          There has been a few attempts; zeronet and one from bittorent themselves that was dropped (I wonder what happened to that).

          None of them have been used to create the killer app that has inspired the required network effect for mainstream usage. I guess finding the magic architecture that works and becomes sticky is the key. There are so many ways to do it!

  • Nomecks
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Reversible Computing

    In theory, we could make computers consume orders of magnitude less power, enabling extreme miniaturization of systems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      When I was learning computing on the electron level I was floored just how much electricity is wasted being converted to heat turning a 1 into a 0 and theorized that a system which would knock electrons around rather than just erasing them, cool to see it’s becoming a real thing.

      I guess we can look forward to superconducting Light Emitting Capacitors that have 100% efficiency, with the unideal component being centralized on a thermoelectric unit to capture waste heat, since that was the other thing that I was successfully theorizing about at the time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      I still don’t quite get what this is. From what I’ve just read it’s transistors with zero heat dissipation caused by zero-ing out the RAM.

      So okay, we have perfect RAM which never needs to be zero’d out, and 1 can be easily be reversed to a 0 if we know the operation that yielded it… but what is the actual computational benefit here?

      For a computer to have reversible RAM, doesn’t that mean we would need to store more computation in order to roll back operations (and again, why would we want to?)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    282 months ago

    Not sure if anyone here would say AI regardless of the title, but for me it would have to be nuclear fusion

  • ShadowRam
    link
    fedilink
    242 months ago

    Realistic Batteries. It’s holding back a LOT of things. A lot of technologies are solved, but just require power.

    Semi-Realistic Room Temperature Super-Conductor.

    If that can be solved, the power density and efficiencies would just be astronomical… It would absolutely destroy multi-billion industries overnight.

    Way-Out-There-Stuff If they ever prove out an actual functional EmDrive-like thruster, that would absolutely open up space travel to our species.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      Batteries are the big one. Can you imagine how many people (homeowners/renters) will go out and buy a tiny 100W panel knowing that even though it will fill a battery with energy very slowly, they can still bank on it for a week?

      Right now we have batteries that can survive about a day, using a modern solar panel system with inverter (~1000€). Imagine when we have batteries that can store weeks of power.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 months ago

    Fusion. I think it’s our only hope of making it through climate change without massive losses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      I don’t think fusion has any chance of being widely deployed by the time that becomes an issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I agree with this. The extreme weather keeps getting significantly worse YOY, and a recent extreme temperature spike in the antarctic has scientists worried that our timeline is a lot shorter than previously estimated, which means significant action needs to be soon.

        We are making excellent progress with fusion, especially the recent development to use AI to keep the magnetic fields containing the reaction stable, but how long will it be before we have a material that is strong enough to withstand the heat of a literal miniature sun for the years at a time required to run a plant? Just the energy from the magnetic field is strong enough that they’ve developed a super efficient was to use those microwaves to bore holes through the earth’s crust hundreds of times deeper than ever before. So we have to at least come up with something significantly stronger than the pressurized material 2km deep into the earth’s surface.

        I am and will remain on the fusion bandwagon, but putting all of our eggs in that basket is a baaaad idea with the current state of things. On that note, that crust-boring technique i mentioned should make geothermal much more viable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          Honestly, I would consider it too late if it ready to build the first commercial plant right now. Building one of those takes a decade or two and building them all over the world takes significantly longer as expertise doesn’t pop up out of nowhere in as many people as you want and neither does funding happen for plants all over the world as the first one isn’t even finished yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -42 months ago

      There’s a massive fusion reactor in the sky that we could easily use by turning the radiation from it into electricity or harnessing the winds that are caused by the temperature differences it creates.

      Nuclear fusion still has a long way to go, but to slow climate change (already too late to stop it) we need to act now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      do you mean fusion? fusions the one that separate atomic nuclei that we’ve had since the 1940’s. fusions the one where atomic nuclei are combined, that make headlines when the reactors run for more than a few seconds

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 months ago

        Your correction is a bit confusing as you said “fusion” three times and “fission” zero times.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 months ago

    Regrowing / regenerating certain body parts.

    This could theoretically be done with stemcell stuff, but it’s not there yet. However, when we finally reach the point where we can infinitely regenerate our body cells, we’ll become effectively “ammortal”; unable to die due to natural causes (such as illness), but we will still die from other people (for example, a bullet to the head)

    Besides that, I think nuclear fusion would be an incredible development if we can finally harness it to power our homes.

    • Xavienth
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      Fusion won’t be the silver bullet people tout it as for much of the same reasons as fission isn’t (mostly politics). No politician wants to spend billions of dollars on something that is going to take a decade to even be functional and another decade to break even. It would get cheaper with scale, but so would fission, we just never let it get there. It also still produces radioactive waste, despite what proponents claim, and it even produces more radioactive waste than a fission reactor by volume. But it isn’t as long-lived.

      These are the same tired arguments we hear about fission. If your country isn’t actively building fission, it’s probably not going to build fusion, aside from demonstrations.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    142 months ago

    Reusable rocketry, specifically SpaceX Starship. If it pans out it’s going to completely change our access to space and make many of those old dreams from the 1970s plausible.

    RNA vaccines for basically everything, including customized vaccines for cancer. There’s also actual progress happening in general cures for autoimmune diseases.

    Is robotics too close to AI? There are multiple companies working on general-purpose humanoid robots intended for mass production with price targets in the ten to twenty thousand dollar range, we may be getting within sight of actual robot butlers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      I’m really not looking forward to the commercialization of low earth orbit, and SpaceX seems to be an accelerator of this.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Low Earth orbit has been heavily commercialized for decades already. If you mean Starlink specifically, what’s wrong with it?

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            Ah, that only happens right after launch when they’re still bunched together. Once the satellites get into their final orbit they spread out. The newer models also have anti-reflection systems that make them much harder to spot, SpaceX has been working with astronomers on that.

    • MaggiWuerze
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I just hope we use Starships capabilities to put less single use hardware in Orbit. The way it is build already releases less space junk for delivering payloads, but these payloads need to be build with servicing in mind. Even building them to burn up should not be the solution

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Yeah the Starship is a great idea, then Starlink et al is just fast food for space basically.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    Computing at the edge.

    Reduces the need to send everything to the cloud and maintains privacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Instead of sending the data to the cloud for calculation/analytics, it does it right there on the device.

        For example, an Alexa or Google Home device sends everything you say after a wake-word back to Amazon or Google. A device with sufficient edge storage and compute would be able to do the same without sending your voice outside your home.

        We’re not quite there yet, but it’s getting closer.

    • @starman
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Isn’t edge computing just a distributed cloud? With servers physically closer to end-user?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        That’s a cloud-centric interpretation. Like using CDNs. That’e been around for a while.

        What I think will be interesting is intelligent processing and storage on end-node devices, like a home gateway, smart appliances, or wearable devices.

        • @starman
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          That would be cool

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 months ago

    Internal alpha-therapy. Imagine attaching a radioactive atom to an antibody that would fix to a cancer, then as alpha radiation do a lot of damage, at a very short range destroy the cancer without doing much damage to the rest of the body

    See that documentary for example
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DkhSFS0FY4

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      I used to be pretty excited about 3d printed homes, but an argument I’ve seen, that’s made me a lot more skeptical of them, is that much of the work of building isn’t putting up the actual walls, it’s all the wiring, plumbing, installing windows and climate control and insulation and roofing and whatever else like that that turns a building from essentially an artificial cave into a more livable space. A 3d printer that prints you walls out of concrete or whatever is only doing the easy part for you in that case, and not necessarily even in the most efficient or desirable manner. Not to say that the idea of more efficient ways to build housing cheaply isn’t interesting to me, I just think that it’d be something more boring, like a a bunch of improvement to modular prefab construction. 3d printing is an awesome technology, but it’s not a good option for everything

      • Jay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I agree, I used to work for a company that made mobile homes in a an assembly line fashion. Two of us could cut and assemble all of the interior and exterior walls in under two days for an 80 foot home. It’s all the other stuff that took time and a lot more people to piece together.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Aren’t there lego-like blocks one can use that allow for simultaneous cavity space and holes for wiring/plumbing and other infrastructure?

        In my naive mind, it’s just a matter of being able to make a reliable brick set that one can snap together and then fill.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The democratization of embedded programming and the capacities it offers. Coupled with 3D printing you can build your own robots or machines with minimal knowledge and money.