• danc4498@lemmy.worldEnglish
    78·
    7 months ago

    I wonder when chat gpt being included in everything will backfire. How many requests are being sent to a multiple servers that people are unaware of and how secure are those servers?

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      51·
      7 months ago

      Yeah my company enabled the use of copilot with our corporate Microsoft accounts. I don’t understand how you can open such a massive can of worms to ALL your users. It’s pretty much begging for information to completely leave corporate control. It’s absolutely insane.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        19·
        7 months ago

        I asked copilot how to turn off copilot, and it responded with “It is probably time to change the question topics”

        • danc4498@lemmy.worldEnglish
          25·
          7 months ago

          This is dumb copilot. Smart copilot will just open up tik tok to whatever your brain can’t resist and you’ll forget you even asked.

            • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
              12·
              7 months ago

              Believing you’re immune makes you particularly vulnerable, because it may hinder you from noticing that you’re wrong. None of us are above deception or manipulation, and to assume otherwise is to let down our guard.

              • vinyl@lemmy.world
                23·
                7 months ago

                NAWWWW no way, I am so immune that I 💯% believe that I am immune to COVID, AIDS, and even Assburgers.

                Edit: are people this dumb that I have to put a /s /j on these comments.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        6·
        7 months ago

        For most commercial products they offer what they call Copilot with data protection.

        I hate that they are shoving it down everyone’s throat but data leakage is a primary company concern that they have addressed.

        Now, how much that is true on the backend is anyone’s guess, but they’re selling something that they could be held legally accountable for.

      • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        21·
        7 months ago

        I mean they’ve been doing multitenancy in Azure for a while… I’d be pretty surprised if the data input from copilot was not handled in the same manner.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      23·
      7 months ago

      Worse, the communication isn’t through some finite algorithm… It’s this amorphouse agent that can be tricked to saying things it’s explicitly designed not to say.

      • jnk@sh.itjust.works
        14·
        7 months ago

        I will die of laughter if someone manages to trick copilot to get data stolen from the USA (or another countrie’s) government by M$. Not saying it will happen, but knowing GPT… Just imagine the memes

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          7·
          7 months ago

          How long til CoPilot coughs up Windows 11 source code, or something like that? That’s what I want. Accidental open sourced windows from overzealous implementation of AI by Microsoft.

          😙🤌

    • mesamune@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      7 months ago

      Local government is also having this issue. Lots of cities don’t have the resources so will probably throw a lot at gpt…which means a very large attack vector.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    25·
    7 months ago

    My manager literally cannot figure out how not to have a giant age of empires ad coat her screen. Microsoft Windows is totally a product you’ve purchased for the sake of handling your business. /s

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      3·
      7 months ago

      It’s more like a whole series of legal covers for everyone involved up and down the chain if things go sideways.

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    161·
    7 months ago

    US government does not have a public fund or tax to pay for the development of a government sanctioned Unix/GNU operating system by a US company. Once that happens, then this issue goes away.

        • MajorHavoc
          11·
          7 months ago

          Yeah. This irks me even more because the US Gov:

          A. Has laws that could have prevented IBM from buying RedHat.

          B. Knows it relies on RedHat for securing critical systems.

          C. Didn’t do shit about the purchase.

          Ideally, each government would look out for the public’s interest, in these things. But in this case, it failed to even look out for it’s own interests (which would have aligned, in this case).

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            7·
            7 months ago

            US Government: “Anti-trust? Pfft, keep that bribery lobbying train coming and we will absolutely trust you.”

            The Public: That’s not what “trust” means… oh…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
      11·
      7 months ago

      In reality it is more complex. However, I know the air force uses a ton of Linux and related tools such as Kubernetes and Samba. Who would’ve thought a fighter jet would be running kubernetes

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    15·
    7 months ago

    The US Government Has a Microsoft Problem

    Microsoft has stumbled through a series of major cybersecurity failures over the past few years. Experts say the US government’s reliance on its systems means the company continues to get a free pass.

  • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    8·
    7 months ago

    It’s extra funny that the PR drone MS have wheeled out has the last name Faehl - how’s that pronounced, I wonder… Could it be fail?

    Fitting really…

    Personally, I’m deeply entwined in the MS product stackpillar of turds and I hate it. They appeared to gave made an honest effort after the trustworthy computing initiative, but that has clearly been eroded…

    Why they’ve got everyone’s trust, I just can’t understand. Convenience trumps everything else, I guess…

  • msage
    8·
    7 months ago

    Remember the South Park movie, when they wanted to invade, and when their visualisation failed, called for Bill Gates?