• Patapon Enjoyer
    link
    fedilink
    765 months ago

    PlayStation often makes unforced errors that make you wonder how it gained such a significant foothold across the last few console generations and such a fiercely loyal audience.

    Mostly unforced errors from other companies. It’s dumb decisions all the way down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Yeah they both make a bunch of really anti consumer choices constantly, I never got the diehards who go hard for the console. Exclusive games I can at least understand, but is an Xbox really that functionality different from a PlayStation?

      I was a Nintendo kid in the 99s, then had a PS2 followed by a 360, I really only got a PS4 cause the opportunity for a deal came up, and I only got a PS5 cause I already had a PS4.

      Admittedly that’s probably where most of the fan clubbing comes from, generationally upgrading until you’re to use to the system to change.

      • kbin_space_program
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Playstation won with the PS5 because MS realized PC players have more money and went back to them.

        MS left the game because they found a better game.

        • OsaErisXero
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Let’s not forget that with Gamepass, it’s not just a better game by folding in PC, but they’re doing something completely different with their consoles than Sony is. More and more, Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo are either competing with Valve or against themselves, and not each other.

          • CALIGVLA
            link
            fedilink
            145 months ago

            Except for Nintendo, they’re still just doing what they’ve been doing for the last 20 years, releasing consoles with outdated hardware and relying on gimmicks to sell them, at this point they’re not even trying to compete anymore, Valve is a stronger competitor for Microsoft and Sony than Nintendo nowadays.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              115 months ago

              Nintendo has always been the king of handheld for as long as handheld gaming has been a thing.

              I’d put a lot of money on them viewing Valve as their biggest threat currently.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                Yeah, I loved my switch when I first got it, but have hardly touched it since I got my steamdeck.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              35 months ago

              But the switch isn’t just an underpowered console… It’s a handheld with an HDMI port

        • Patapon Enjoyer
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I don’t think they would be ditching the table if they were winning tbh. Their goal is always to get as many people to subscribe to their stuff as possible

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Playstation’s exclusives are on the whole, a lot more interesting to me. I honestly have almost no interest in Xbox because of that. It’s not the hardware, it’s purely the software.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      I think the answer is simple (they probably mentioned it in the article I’m not reading). Sony makes good hardware and good games. They don’t really need to compete with Nintendo since they kinda do their own thing at this point, and Microsoft is really no better. I also think Playstation is generally regarded as having better exclusives, even during the 360 era where Xbox clearly won.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Actually in the 360 era, the PS3 ended up selling more by the end.

        So in the public eye people usually consider the 360 winning but by other metrics, the PS3 did.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          My experience is that seems to be a US centric view that the 360 “won” it’s generation, I’ve never encountered that view locally and it’s ultimately not born out by statistics although it was the closest Microsoft ever came.

          • MrScottyTay
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            In the UK, where I’m from, it’s widely considered 360 won too.

            The reason the PS3 won in the end I think was due to a worsening opinion of Microsoft towards the end when the original plan for the Xbox One was being discussed and shown, along with a lot of teenage gamers now being older with more disposable income allowing them to buy a PS3 later in the generation and trying out all of the exclusives they missed out on.

            I don’t know how true this rings out in general, but that was pretty much my experience.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              I’m in the UK and no one I know considers the 360 to have won, regional preferences for one over the other perhaps?

              • MrScottyTay
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                The north east for me. Pretty much everyone had a 360 and everyone still calls it “the 360 days” or something of the other. But might just be the people I come across. Only had a few friends that had a PS3 in school, they always seemed to be left out from what the others were doing gaming wise. Wasn’t until the PS4 until I started seeing people back to playing PlayStation by default like the PS2 days.

    • haui
      link
      fedilink
      -75 months ago

      I feel like we‘re not seeing/talking about the reason the console market is another duopoly. Its a harsh failure on cartel prevention laws imo. New consoles should pop up here and there yet they dont (very small opening for steamseck likes). Its not a healthy market.

      At first glance I think the IP laws are the problem here. A new console should be able to run xbox games and/or ps5 games and compete on hardware and ergonomics alone imo. That way the competition would drive prices down and decisions would again be for improving the service, not the bottom line.

      Disclaimer: trolls will be blocked immediately.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        the reason the console market is another duopoly

        hmm…

        Sony… Microsoft… Nintendo…

        Duopoly…

        I feel like you’ve made an error even if we’re only talking about the major 3.

        Also wonder if you’re blind.

        New consoles should pop up here and there yet they dont (very small opening for steamseck likes)

        They do. You just don’t hear about them all the time because the main 3 are so present in the discussion. Atari released the VCS (2021) for example. Oculus I would argue should count at this point too. There’s many examples we could go on about. But I have a feeling you don’t actually care about this discussion since you want to discount the obvious forefront contender of the SteamDeck.

        A new console should be able to run xbox games and/or ps5 games

        This is not at all the problem. You need to compile the game for the platform. That wouldn’t be IP laws, that would simply be development… except in the case of console exclusives. Which would still not be IP laws, but instead would be contract law between the developers and the console company. The developers of the game 100% have a right to the source code of their game and to compile it for whatever they want.

        Disclaimer: trolls will be blocked immediately.

        Can you block yourself on Lemmy? I’ve never tried.

        Edit: In a move that surprised no-one. They downvoted my post and didn’t say anything in return. I guess they have no further argument.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    565 months ago

    Article gets kinda weird at the end and calls the review bombing harassment. Seems like a 180 from the beginning of the article, unless the writer thinks Sony would have changed its mind with 0 protest action.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      395 months ago

      It also calls all the customers who don’t want to be locked out of the product they paid for ‘fickle’ and brought up gamergate out of nowhere, so I’m honestly not sure what sort of agenda they’re pushing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      205 months ago

      What a delusional perspective. I wish I could get “harassed” by thousands of fans clearly explaining what they want from my software.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      The whole article was poorly written honestly, but yeah, that part really felt off. If the only thing they care about is money, then by nature our only real means of protest is to affect their money.

    • MrScottyTay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      It’s probably them just trying to go for a synonym to describe what happened as they’re not usually allowed to repeat themselves.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    335 months ago

    Attempted in the name of greed, reversed in the name of greed.

    Corporations are the answer to “what will make the most amount of money?”

    The only thing they learned, for the next week, is that a healthy playerbase is more profitable than an exclusive one.

  • @UndercoverUlrikHD
    link
    185 months ago

    What’s weird about the whole incident is that anyone with even the slightest knowledge of the PC gaming space could have told you that this is exactly what would happen.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 months ago

    The biggest stumble seems to be from releasing without the requirement initially, and making the game available for sale in non-PSN countries.

    Other studios like EA and Microsoft have traditionally required their accounts on online games since release; but unless I’m wrong, those accounts are also available in more countries.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    As always, probably a decision that came from up high, I assume everyone actually on the floor in Sony know this world be a terrible thing and universally hated and argued as such.

    Very smart of arrow head to announce the update to get the public’s opinion before the change was implemented.