• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    574 months ago

    How creating an account in yet another centralized social media app is going to solve things? Policy might be anti AI now, but what happens if Cara get’s sold and the new company decides to change it? Don’t get me wrong is good that options are popping out to give some fair market share to Meta, but how is Cara sustainable in the long run?

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      234 months ago

      but what happens if Cara get’s sold and the new company decides to change it

      Same thing that happens if a federated instance goes bad: you leave?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        214 months ago

        A big difference is that, instead of leaving all content behind because it was only hosted there, you still have a lot of content as only a piece of the federated content disappears (or defederates, or paywalls, w/e)

        • The Doctor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          134 months ago

          Do people seriously not keep copies of their finished work anymore? They just post them and delete the local copy?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            94 months ago

            It’s not just about the content posted by individuals though. The community and relationships built on a centralized platform are also at risk to a much greater degree than they would be on federated social media.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 months ago

      I agree. But I think this an OK idea, until someone makes this with a FOSS platform, in the fediverse. Choices are good.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        214 months ago

        If their goal is to prevent AI trainers from scraping their art then an open federated platform is the opposite of what they want.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        I tried to get a statement from pixelfed when it came to AI and content scraping but there has not been any replies yet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    214 months ago

    They also dont allow nsfw so its dead in the water for being any different than IG. Scrapers will get the art for AI

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It also has an expensive back end and no plans for any kind of monetization, so it’s dead in the water from that side too. The moment they’re successful they’re broke.

  • @muhyb
    link
    144 months ago

    How it’s anti-AI in a useful way? If I can view it, so can AI.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Anti-AI people tend to be grifters just as much as the people who think AI (in it’s current form) will solve all our problems.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    love the mission and the message, but if i know anything about how things like this go, what it is, is about to die

    EDIT: yeah, their about page says they “filter out generative AI images” without even mentioning how. never mind that with the rate the AI field is advancing, no algorithm for doing that works for more than a couple of months. no word at all on how or even if the photos users upload are going to be protected from scraping.

    i hate to be a cynic, i do, and i can’t wait for this to age poorly but $20 says the website won’t even last a year

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They don’t appear to even have basic protections against ai. They didn’t even get rid of the context menu to download them, and the app shows up in google image search which means google has the thumbnails. It’s a losing battle, if you can see it so can ai, but they could at least but a few speed bumps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      The whole site seems like a PoC - the accounts don’t even have passwords! (I could actually kinda get on board with this)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          they just send a OTP to your email with the idea that you should be keeping your email secure (and that email providers are more secure than they can be)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            Given how common it is for people to use the ‘reset password’ link for this exact purpose, it does make it seem kinda redundant to even implement passwords on many services to begin with.

  • BougieBirdie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    I just shared this with my wife because she’s an artist and hates AI as much as I do.

    Apparently she made an account last night.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    Anti-AI is a brain-dead idea anyway. Artists should be more open with their art, not less. Yes, even with AI.

    • Vodulas [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Are you saying artists should be OK with AI companies stealing their art an using it without permission?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        Well, if you don’t copyright everything, then it’s not stealing. We need more open culture, not closed off “IP”.

        • Vodulas [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          The issue there is that we still live in a capitalist hellscape, and artists need to make money to survive. Until we have a situation where artists can make art and not worry about where their rent (yes, fuck landlords) or food, they will need to be able to make a living somehow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          You don’t have to do ANYthing in order to have copyright on your images.

          That is standard throughout the Berne convention & has been for decades.

          Registering makes court-cases easier to win, but having copyright on one’s renditions isn’t in any way requiring that one have registered anything with anybody.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Ok, but that is beside the point. Copyright only serves the interests of large IP holders, like Disney.

        • @onlinepersona
          link
          14 months ago

          On principal I agree, but have you thought about how artists are to make a living? It is already hard now, so how should they make money in the future?

          Anti Commercial-AI license

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            The same way they are now? Copyright is barely a protection for independent artists, and largely serves the interests of big “IP” holders like Disney.