• audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I love how this is painted entirely as the fault of people who chose not to vote, and not the fault of the Democrats who seem to try their best to run the shittiest possible candidate. If Democrats would have run a candidate that was worth voting for, maybe more people would have turned out to vote for their candidate.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. What more would you have us do? We’re past the point of voting being the only thing you have to do to resist, and we’re past the point of individuals being responsible for where we are. Levers are being pulled that the public and voters have no control over. If you’re not in an organization that opposes fascism in some way, you’re not doing enough.

        • Veraxus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The point is, Hillary won the popular vote. By a lot. That’s the only thing that should matter in a democracy. We’ve been robbed of our agency and self-determination. We’re past the point where voting alone can make a difference. They won. They finished their fascist foundation, they have shielded themselves from accountability and consequence, they have given themselves the power of fiat at almost every level. This was always their plan, and it’s time we seize back everything that was stolen from us.

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      In 2016 Democrats ran a widely disliked neoliberal through a heavily biased primary and wonder why they lose.

        • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          She was shady. She was manipulative. I saw it firsthand during the Iowa caucuses of 2016 when she sent out a guide on “how to run a caucus” with a bunch of stuff that was intentionally misleading to favor an establishment candidate.

            • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 months ago

              Not suggestions, misinformation. Like it lied about how a caucus should be run, lied about what happens in a disagreement, lied about how delegates have to vote. Like someone in our precinct ended up calling the Iowa DNC to confirm that information that Clinton’s campaign provided was wrong.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          She’s generally dislikable. Calling anyone who doesn’t like her a sexist is an example of the attitude that continues to help the Republicans win elections.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s clear that you didn’t understand the meme nor do you understand this community. I’ll make this clear, you cannot win in a rigged system. On top of that when the Democrats win we get jerks like Genocide Joe (btw any genocide sympathetic comments will be removed).

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Democrats are complicit. The Republicans are at least forthcoming with their goals. “We’re going to burn this shit to the ground”. Whereas the Democrats are like “vote for this corporatist candidate that nobody likes or we’ll let the Republicans burn this shit to the ground”.