• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ruby syntax is nice although I prefer python way of enforcing indentation instead of adding "end"s. Personally I just want a statically typed language with enforced indent as syntax.

    • VonReposti@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Funny, the forced indentation is what I hate about Python. If you think a missing semicolon can be hard to catch, don’t ever think about a missing whitespace :p

      The end keyword really isn’t a big deal for me. I find it to be a good way to easily spot the end of a method. But if you wouldn’t like it I’d still find it a good compromise to avoid syntax issues due to whitespace.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        i can count on one hand how many times ive had white space issues in 15 years of using python. its just not an issue

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Same and agreed, especially if you keep your functions small and focused as you should. 3-5 indents is nbd to keep track of, and if you need more than that… No you don’t, refactor.

          I’ve had way more hangups with brackets then indentation, personally, not that either is a super frequent issue, but I’m indenting anyway, so brackets are redundant and just another thing I have to keep track of

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        } helps me easily spot the end of stuff. end just blends into the statements.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just add a linter to your build lol. Now if it’s indented wrong it breaks!