I’ve been reading through Signal’s government requests and couldn’t find a similar section on Mullvad’s website. I’d be curious to read about them if there are any. It would seem unlikely to me that Mullvad has never received any kind of court order for information about a user.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s a bit misleading, they did receive a request, and a search warrant was attempted, but since the data they wanted didn’t exist, nothing happened.

      Good link, but just the word yes didn’t accurately answer the question.

      • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        just the word yes didn’t accurately answer the question

        correct, which is why the link was provided. the OP can figure the rest out, as you did

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Since you are pedantic. The answer yes is absolutely correct and not misleading. The question was “Has given a court order to reveal…” and not “Was revealed personal information 'cause of a court order”.

        • msage
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You sir are technically correct.

          The best kind of correct.