I’ve been reading through Signal’s government requests and couldn’t find a similar section on Mullvad’s website. I’d be curious to read about them if there are any. It would seem unlikely to me that Mullvad has never received any kind of court order for information about a user.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s a bit misleading, they did receive a request, and a search warrant was attempted, but since the data they wanted didn’t exist, nothing happened.

      Good link, but just the word yes didn’t accurately answer the question.

      • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        just the word yes didn’t accurately answer the question

        correct, which is why the link was provided. the OP can figure the rest out, as you did

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Since you are pedantic. The answer yes is absolutely correct and not misleading. The question was “Has given a court order to reveal…” and not “Was revealed personal information 'cause of a court order”.

        • msage
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You sir are technically correct.

          The best kind of correct.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    IIRC, they get requests for data, and, if the request is valid, hand over what they have, which is virtually nothing as they don’t keep logs. There is no provision in Swedish or EU law that could compel them to start keeping logs.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      They also “retain lawyers to monitor the legal landscape should they need to move core parts of [their] business”

  • aiccount@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What could they even give? They don’t even ask for an email, and they claim to run everything you browse as RAM that never gets held or recorded.

    • communism@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes if you get a court order for data you don’t hold, you don’t have to provide data you don’t have access to. I wasn’t expecting that Mullvad would have any useful data to give, I just wanted to read their response/commentary is all

      • aiccount@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t see why people would use a credit card to pay for a vpn, it seems like it would totally defeat the purpose. I guess if you get ahold of an anonymous card then it would be fine, but using a card in your name to pay for an anonymous service just seems wacky to me.

        I’m curious, does anyone here pay for their vpn with something thatvis in their name? If so, why?

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because that’s not our threat model.

          I want to be anonymous for the sites I visit. I want my ISP, who’s likely selling my data, to have none. I want to use a WiFi without anybody sniffing.

          I’m lucky enough to live in a county were I’m not prosecuted for my ideas or who I am, and I’m not doing anything illicit aside from torrent.

          So the hassle doesn’t seem needed in this case. If I think Mullvad can harm me if they know my name, then I wouldn’t use it at all, even with private payments.

        • fluckx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Anonimity is keeping your identity private, but not your actions.

          Privacy is keeping your actions hidden, but not your identity.

          Using a VPN will hide your IP and make you more anonymous online. Using a personal CC to buy the vpn does not compromise that and does not defeat the purpose at all.

          Only if your specific account ID is compromised could the personal CC be used against you by identifying you. E.g.: “they” found your bad email in an inbox of somebody who is less privacy conscious and are trying to figure out who festybear69@... is.

          It depends on what your use-case/threat model is.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yeah, if they’re looking for your data on VPN services, they obviously already know you use it, most likely because of the IP.