• Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love how the arstechnica article words it like you will never need FAT32 and it’s silly to consider it.

    I had to download fat32format I don’t know how many times because I needed to format an extra large SD Card or USB drive for some device. Microsoft really shafted exFAT’s adoption with their licensing.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      FAT32 is also really simple to implement. Supporting exFAT may require a larger microcontroller with more memory, which results in a more expensive product.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      I personally haven’t had to touch it in over a decade, but I guess there’s probably some uses for it still, yeah.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        4 months ago

        Personal computers and flagship phones? Yeah you can probably use exFAT.

        Video game consoles and handhelds? Dashcams? Car entertainment centers? Cheap android devices? 100% going to be FAT32 partitioned with a Master Boot Record

    • mhm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep, many smart TVs still only accept FAT32 format. I have to split my HDR videos into multiple files to be able to watch them on TV — because of 4GiB size limit.