• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Given last week’s stories about Rust and the Linux kernel, this almost feels like a pointed message from Google’s devs to the Linux kernel devs.

  • kersplomp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nit: One engineer at a company saying something is not the same as that whole company saying something. I wish they would just say “Google employee insists…”

  • FizzyOrange
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Make sense. Firmware is also extra difficult to debug so it’s nice to use a language that significantly reduces the amount of debugging you need to do.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe but at this point any thing google suggests is a signpost to do the opposite

  • refalo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I want to see specific examples of serious bugs that rust would catch that clang -Weverything, clazy/clang-tidy and scan-build would not find for C++… because I’m still not convinced it is anywhere near worth learning at all for career/veteran C and C++ folks.