• towerful
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree.
      Users likely trust their instances admins

      • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance’s admins.

        Even if my instance’s admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn’t mean he will never read any “private” messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

          • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even if I did fully trust my instance, I also would have to trust any instance I message with.

            I personally just use Lemmy for public comments.

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?