• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 hours ago

    Tldr research shows it isn’t but some people don’t like it and misuse / misquote studies that dealt with constant neglect / stress and apply them to an hour before the kid falls asleep and is crying.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    When my partner and I started discussing sleep training, we were wondering whether it was a neutral choice for our son (like using formula or a pacifier)

    What a strange thing to say. Both have been shown to have a number of disadvantages.

    The fact that there’s not a lot of data supporting the notion of sleep training being harmful is interesting, but still: What a way to start an article about scientific thinking.

  • @MajorHavoc
    link
    10
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Great info. Awful website design. Thanks for sharing this.

    Edit: My usability complaint is fixed!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Agree, just make a static site. on mobile I had to keep scrolling multiple times to make all the animations happen

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      323 hours ago

      I’m reading on a phone and I really thought the article style was cool. Maybe it was novelty but I liked that I could scroll quickly through it, or I could click on each data point.

      • @MajorHavoc
        link
        3
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I also think it’s cool, but it traded away the basic usability of knowing if swipe down is doing anything or not.

        A simple page progress indicator along the side would restore that, and plant this firmly in cool.

        (And it did!)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      All seems too harsh. On mobile it was OK, probably made it easier to scroll through and read the whole thing without adhd kicking in.