• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Typescript is always compiled down to JavaScript, so it’s kinda the same thing, but with “nicer” clothes.

        • LeFantome
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Rust does not compile down to C. It generates LLVM bytecode the same as Clang does. They both produce native executables. You do not need a C compiler on your system to run Rust binaries.

          Typescript produces JavaScript. You need a JavaScript interpreter to execute the output from TypeScript.

          Not the same thing.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In before the pedants: clang is a c compiler, in that it compiles c code—but it also compiles other languages too. The distinction is that c, c++, rust, etc are compiled directly into byte code , whereas typescript is transpiled into another language (JavaScript) before it is executed. I’ll probably catch heat for this, but you can liken TypeScript to C++ because they both are supersets of another language.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              C++ is actually not a superset of C, believe it or not.

              • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ll admit I’m no c/c++ aficionado, but after a little research I see what you mean. Originally, C++ was a superset of C, but C has since diverged to include things that are not in C++. So we are both correct.