I saw some threads here about Telegram and piracy stuff being banned. So, as an experimental alternative, I created a public Signal group for piracy.

Maybe it’ll be useful?

Before joining

Signal supports usernames and hiding telephone numbers. Here’s a blog entry on how to do so. You might want to:

  • set a username
  • change your profile name (these are two separate things!)
  • hide your phone number
  • Wistful
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129 hours ago

    What is even the point of “piracy groups”? What exactly can you find there that you cannot in other places designed for that, e.g., trackers, usenet, forums…?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5718 hours ago

    You might try a Matrix group instead. Doesn’t require a phone number and supports more than 1000 users unlike Signal. Search is bad though unfortunately.

      • riccardo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 hour ago

        It still requires a phone number to sign up, but you don’t need to share it to chat with someone

    • darkstar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      413 hours ago

      Some suggest matrix, others simplex. Not sure which one would be better honestly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    314 hours ago

    Tracker Control is blocking me from joining. Weird that Molly (its a hardened signal fork) is showing amazon is being contacted when trying to join the group.

    I can unblock it but its weird. I also noticed the other domains its been trying to (unsuccessfully) contact.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1622 hours ago

    Good idea overall, unfortunately they still have your IP and phone number which means Europeans are still implicated

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        721 hours ago

        Sure they don’t log the IPs, but it is technically impossible to not know the IP when you’re running a centralized service.

        • blicanteOP
          link
          fedilink
          521 hours ago

          What are the “popular” alternatives? Telegram stores everything, WhatsApp doesn’t allow usernames, Matrix requires IPs too…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              621 hours ago

              Despite their claims of total privacy, I imagine, like any software company, they have full access to their own back end including encryption keys and server logs. Meaning they can and probably will moderate their own platform if there is enough pressure from nation states/IP owners.

                • DaGeek247
                  link
                  fedilink
                  420 hours ago

                  You understand that, for everyone except for a complete network pro, that is worse for security and privacy, right?

                  Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that you can.

                  But the reason piracy websites struggle so much with long term stability isn’t because they’re hosting the wrong software.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            320 hours ago

            TBH I would just use email over TOR and encrypt communication with PGP. Rotate identities every now and then and you should be fine. Yes it doesn’t have forward secrecy but it removes the effort to find the “right messaging” service and is instead ubiquitous (and you can sign up for anonymous email addresses online too, which makes it even better).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 hours ago

      The phone number is not connected to the messages. That’s the only thing they have. It is the best app for privacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        418 hours ago

        Arguable in it being “the best app for privacy”. Can you link to a source which shows that phone numbers are not linked to accounts? (Why do they need them anyway?)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          213 hours ago

          They have published requests from the law enforcement and their responses to these requests. The only unencrypted data they have is the phone number, a date of sign up and a date of the last login. That is it, everything else is encrypted and they cannot access it whatsoever.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 hours ago

            The problem is, if you’re in Europe, your phone number is associated with your identity

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              53 minutes ago

              No you don’t.

              I can go to the corner shop/local garage right now, buy a SIM card for 99p and then buy a top-up voucher in cash to have a completely anonymous phone number.

              Albeit is the UK in Europe again? 🙈

              edit: where I would be worried if my privacy was on the line is I could also go to the local pawn shop / Cash Converters to ensure that SIM card isn’t associated with an IMEI I’ve previously used and buy in cash a cheapo phone.

              • socsa
                link
                fedilink
                143 minutes ago

                The last time I bought a SIM in the UK I was told specifically I could not buy it with cash.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 hours ago

              But, again, all they can prove is that you signed up to Signal and when you last signed in.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  You also don’t need to show any ID for a business to meet “know-your-customer” regulations. Can you get a phone number without revealing your identity?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    319 hours ago

    The problem is Signal supports up to 1000 people group chat, so it’s better to find something different