• Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which would be more true than most of Putin’s claims.

        Nazi is stretching the word, but not really very much. Palestinians are Semites though, so anti-Semitic isn’t a stretch at all, it’s just blatantly correct

        • PoTayToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Antisemitism has one specific definition, which is the hatred of Jews.

          Please don’t use an etymological fallacy often used by antisemites (“It’s not antisemitism, I’m not calling for the death of Palestinians” is an actual thing I’ve seen). Also as yesman said, “Semites” is indeed race science, which should not be used as if it has any kind of validity whatsoever.

        • yesman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Semite” is as archaic (and accurate) as “mongoloid” or “Aryan”. It’s no matter that it uses language as a proxy for blood. Reformed race science is still race science.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was under the impression “Semitic peoples” broadly meant “from the Eastern Mediterranean coastal area.” While there’s obviously been a lot of migration to and from the area, is it really as pseudoscientific as making up things about the spread of a random tribe that migrated to India?

            • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              There are two definitions of Semitic peoples, one of which is accurate and still in use and another of which is obsolete race science.

              Ancient Semitic peoples were a real and well-attested ethnolinguistic group of speakers of proto-Semitic, a branch of the Afroasiatic language family that evolved into Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic, Amharic, and other languages. The emergence, distribution and development of these languages in the 3rd millennium BC is of great historical importance as Akkadian, the language of ancient Babylon, accounts for some of our earliest examples of written language in ancient Mesopotamia.

              The obsolete definition was constructed by German pseudo-historians in the 1700s and 1800s as a way to distinguish Jews, Arabs, and other peoples from “Aryan” whites, which of course influenced the development of Nazi ideology and antisemitism in the sense of discrimination against Jews.

              So there’s a real and important definition here if we’re talking about the languages and cultures of ancient Mesopotamia, and a modern definition that was invented by German racists to justify their purported superiority over other “races.”

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Israel will do what it always does and follow the advice of Aaron burr:

          “Geniuses, lower your voices You keep out of trouble, and you double your choices”

          They know Russia is supporting Iran and Hamas, but they also know Russia is a useful foil for US to make sure we never take them for granted.

          It’s just chess, Russia isn’t a permanent enemy, and they’re always dumb enough to be manipulated usefully.