Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    Ā·
    5 hours ago

    Me, a nuclear engineer reading about ā€œGoogle restarting six nuclear power plantsā€

    lol, lmao even

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    7 hours ago

    Zitronā€™s given commentary on PC Gamerā€™s publicly pilloried pro-autoplag piece:

    Heā€™s also just dropped a thorough teardown of the tech press for their role in enabling Silicon Valleyā€™s worst excesses. I donā€™t have a fitting Kendrick Lamar reference for this, but I do know a good companion piece: Devs and the Culture of Tech, which goes into the systemic flaws in tech culture which enable this shit.

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    v light, only weakly techtakes material, but Iā€™m immature enough to want to share:

    spoiler

    I just got a sales email from ā€œRichard at Autodeskā€ titled ā€œHear from the probing expertsā€

    Does anyone read these things before or after theyā€™re sent?

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      9 hours ago

      Does anyone read these things before or after theyā€™re sent?

      It sounds like spam - by my guess, they usually arenā€™t read at all.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        2 hours ago

        Thanks to the power of Technologyā„¢ we can have an LLM generate spam, an automailer send it out to millions, where an automated spam filter can identify them and hide them in a separate inbox to be automatically deleted in a couple of days. Of course the technology isnā€™t perfect and sometimes someone sees one of these ads and, I assume, spends money on a product. But I have faith that these problems are solvable and weā€™ll be able to totally automate email spam to no longer interact with human beings at any point. Once thatā€™s done we can apply the same methodologies to weekly internal memos, daily team meetings, and even unsolicited dick pics. Imagine never needing to take or see pictures of a strangerā€™s junk ever again while still massively scaling up the number of unsolicited dick pics in flight at any given time.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      10 hours ago

      the raw, mediocre teenage energy of assuming you can pick up any subject in 2 weeks because youā€™ve never engaged with a subject more complex than playing a video game and you self-rate your skill level as far higher than it actually is (and the sad part is, the person posting this probably isnā€™t a teenager, they just never grew out of their own bullshit)

      given how oddly specific ā€œapplication auth protocolā€ is, bets on this person doing at best minor contributions to someone elseā€™s OAuth library they insist on using everywhere? and when theyā€™re asked to use a more appropriate auth implementation for the situation or to work on something deeper than the surface-level API, their knowledge immediately ends

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          4 hours ago

          so uh, they keep self-fellating on Twitter about how they invented their own CAD program over the objections of the haters

          here it is, itā€™s an extremely thin wrapper around the typescript version of manifold with live reloading on changes. note that not only is manifold already a CAD library, they already have a web-based editor that reloads the model on code changes, and kacheā€™s live reloading is just nodemon. the server part looks like itā€™s barely modified from a code example. the renderer is just three.js grabbed from a CDN.

          itā€™s so weird they didnā€™t take the necessary 2 weeks to learn how to write the CAD parts of the CAD system they made!

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            17 minutes ago

            hackers and builders (both in the a16z definition of) are some of the fucking worst things out there today

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          4 hours ago

          the absolute worst type of coworker from my cubicle days: heard about a technology at a conference, decided they invented it

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      12 hours ago

      This person has certainly committed to this philosophy, even to the extent of spending less than one week of thought coming to this very conclusion.

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        5 hours ago

        Fun fact: The plain vanilla physics major at MIT requires three semesters of quantum mechanics. And thatā€™s not including the quantum topics included in the statistical physics course, or the experiments in the lab course that also depend upon it.

        Grad school is another year or so of quantum on top of that, of course.

        (MIT OpenCourseWare actually has fairly extensive coverage of all three semesters: 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06. Zwiebach was among the best lecturers in the department back in my day, too.)

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I almost want to go Twitter diving to see if kache has the requisite unhinged rant about how universities are only making quantum physics hard to get money/because of woke or whatever

          e: holy shit I already regret this

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            51 minutes ago

            oh, cool, they also claim to be a twitter engineer. thatā€™s probably telling too (if true)

          • istewart@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            Ā·
            1 hour ago

            yeah donā€™t do it to yourself. I forget how I originally noticed this weirdo, it may have been through amolitor99ā€™s continuous anthropology safari of TPOT freaks. Speaking of which, somebody needs to get that guy over here

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              55 minutes ago

              dammit now Iā€™m going to have to look at twitter

              tpot fresh on my mind, too. just yesterday i was telling someone about how one of the people semi in that cluster had me going šŸ¤Ø and then had to explain a little about some of the highlights of tpot

          • o7___o7@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            1 hour ago

            whoaā€¦on second thought, maybe this dude is having a manic episode or something? yeesh!

          • blakestacey@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            yeah, 3b1b animations can take you through all of undergrad math in probably a month if it all existed and you used anki

            We could bottle this arrogance and sell it as an emetic.

            And besides, we all know that mathematics videos peaked with the Angle Dance.

            • swlabr@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              Ā·
              3 hours ago

              as one of many people here who has undergone undergrad math, i reckon a month of youtube and anki might not be enough for even intro to linear algebra. Iā€™m even saying this as someone who skipped all lectures and crammed before all the tests.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    16 hours ago

    Speaking of twitter shit, Iā€™m sad that itā€™s back online in Brazil.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      16 hours ago

      Boo! Hiss! Bring Saltman back out! I want unhinged conspiracy theories, damnit.

      It feels like this is supposed to be the entrenchment, right? Like, the AGI narrative got these companies and products out into the world and into the public consciousness by promising revolutionary change, and now this fallback position is where we start treating the things that have changed (for the worse) as fair accompli and stop whining. But as Ed says, I donā€™t think the technology itself is capable of sustaining even that bar.

      Like, for all that social media helped usher in surveillance capitalism and other postmodern psychoses, it did so largely by providing a valuable platform for people to connect in new ways, even if those ways are ultimately limited and come with a lot of external costs. Uber came into being because providing an app-based interface and a new coat of paint on the taxi industry hit on a legitimate market. I donā€™t think I could have told you how to get a cab in the city I grew up in before Uber, but itā€™s often the most convenient way to get somewhere in that particular hell of suburban sprawl unless you want to drive yourself. And of course it did so by introducing an economic model that exploits the absolute shit out of basically everyone involved.

      In both cases, the thing that people didnā€™t like was external or secondary to the thing people did like. But with LLMs, it seems like the thing people most dislike is also the main output of the system. People donā€™t like AI art, they donā€™t like interacting with chatbots in basically anywhere, and the confabulation problems undercut their utility for anything where correlation to the real world actually matters, leaving them somewhere between hilariously and dangerously inept at many of the functions theyā€™re still being pitched for.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      17 hours ago

      You know, I canā€™t tell if this is supposed to be ā€œI know youā€™re saying that calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, but itā€™s more complicated than thatā€ or ā€œI know calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, and Iā€™m honestly okay with thatā€.

      Gonna guess the latter given where itā€™s coming from and the fact that the actual ā€œmore complicatedā€ is a salad of non sequiturs.

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    Ā·
    23 hours ago

    Max Tegmark has taken a break from funding neo-Nazi media to blather about Artificial General Intelligence.

    As humanity gets closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

    The first clause of the opening line, and weā€™ve already hit a ā€œcitation neededā€.

    He goes from there to taking a prediction market seriously. And that Aschenbrenner guy who thinks that Minecraft speedruns are evidence that AI will revolutionize ā€œscience, technology, and the economyā€.

    You know, ten or fifteen years ago, I would have disagreed with Tegmark about all sorts of things, but I would have granted him default respect for being a scientist.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      2 hours ago

      The first image in that second link is perhaps the most incoherent political cartoon Iā€™ve ever seen. Why is Uncle Sam as played by Angry Jeff Bridges wearing the Chinese flag as a cape??

    • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      After he started rambling about his Mathematical Universe Hypothesis, it was obvious his brain was cooked.

      As humanity gets closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

      Arrow of time and all that, innit? And God help me, I actually read part of the post as well as the discussion comments where the prompt fondlers were lamenting that all it takes is one rogue ai code to end the world because it will ā€œoptimize against you!ā€ I assume Evil GPT is constructing anti matter bombs using ingredients it finds under the kitchen sink.

      • sc_griffith@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I remember he went on julia galefā€™s podcast to talk about the MUH and she was like ā€œbut what does that meanā€ and simple questions like that and he flailed, it was painful to hear

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        5 hours ago

        This is just straight-up gossip, but why not:

        Tegmark used to go around polling physicists at conferences about which interpretation of quantum mechanics they prefer. A colleague of mine said that they were sitting near Tegmark and saw him fudging the numbers in his notes ā€” erasing the non-Many Worlds tallies from those who said they supported Many Worlds as well as others, IIRC.