• Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    No matter who wins it won’t be our last election. I do know that the next one will definitely be the most important election of our lifetime though.

  • Steal Wool@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, ya know what Grammy always said:
    Hope in one hand, shit in the other, and see which one fills up faster…

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    How the fuck does the US manage to make people stand in line for early voting?

    In every civilized country, you can show up on election day (when basically everyone has a free day cause it’s Sunday), you vote with maybe 3-4 people in line before you, and you’re done after 10 minutes.

      • Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The people’s will gets in the way of the will of the Oligarchs, religious leaders, and Plutocrats. Hence the effort to make it hard to vote.

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Every election I’ve ever voted in has had at least a 20 minute wait. I’ve mostly lived in medium to high density population centers my whole life. I’ve voted on voting day, I voted by absentee and there was a line for the drop box during COVID, I just did my early voting as a first time Texas voter and there was a 45 minute line to use the voting machines, not even a pen and paper ballot. I’ve never not seen a line at the polls. It’s always been strange to me thinking about the number of folks who DON’T vote vs how many people I personally witness voting every season. But then again, many people don’t like standing out in a heat wave while it’s raining so I guess it makes sense that a lot of them don’t go.

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is what happens in some Republican controlled states when they limit the times and places and how people can vote. Trump said a few years ago that if minorities vote, Republicans will never win another election. So Republican controlled states started getting rid of polling stations and changing voting times to standard working hours, etc, knowing that people wouldn’t be able to take time off from work to stand in the now longer lines (due to fewer polling stations) or would want to stand in longer lines.

      Plus, election day is not a national holiday like it is in most other countries, so people don’t get the day off to vote. Though some companies give 3 or 4 hours paid time off strictly for voting.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are usually way more polling locations open on election day than during early voting. They set up polling at churches, schools, and community centers all over.

      During early voting I have to go to the courthouse which is in the next town over. There aren’t any polling places in my city.

    • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I dont know I live in America, longest it has ever taken me to vote on Election Day is 20 minutes, yet people are still waiting in long lines to early vote this year. Typically few people early vote so there are fewer early voting places. But that is not the case this year, so we have giant early vote lines. I am not sure why my neighbors are waiting in long lines to early vote when it will take 10 times as long as in Election Day.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same. It’s like a short stop on a Sunday walk… Because we ALWAYS VOTE ON SUNDAY!

    • Man you see how it happens. You see these Republicans out there trying to fuck everything when it comes to making it easy to vote. In some places you dip your finger in a jar of ink after you cast your vote, that’s how they make sure nobody was twice on election day. In some places, I assume it’s all computerized and still accurate. That, and Nobody wants to run for office and get death threats from their neighbors, the most absolute gullible dumbasses in town. Every person in my neighborhood with a Trump sign have no idea how anything works except their own one particular job, and how to get scared at anything else.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is working as designed, since it is meant to discourage people from voting. The less voter participation the better results for Republicans.

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      In the state of Oregon, I just get mailed a ballot and can either mail it back or drop it off…last year, I did a drive-through ballot drop off at the state capital.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I like what california did last election: everyone got an absentee ballot. That way I could fill it out at home and drop it off at my polling location at my leisure. There was a line, but I got to walk past it.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve never stood in like for early voting in the EU. I’ve done it at my supermarket while getting groceries.

    Grab a ballot and envelope, enter booth, do the thing, walk to desk, flash id, get crossed off list, watch volunteer put your envelope in another envelope and drop it in the ballot box.

    In-and-out, three minutes.

    Come to think of it, voting on election day has always been just as smooth. I just have to go to the library or some school, so it’s not as convenient.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I never had to wait for longer than 5 minutes to vote and I never voted early. Mostly because it takes 10 minutes of my time on voting day, which is always a Sunday.

      Polling places can’t be further away than 1,5km I believe, so wherever you live, it will be close enough to just walk there.

      I have voted in schools, kindergardens, a community center and a church.

  • ZealousSealion@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s weird seeing queues for voting.

    When I vote, I walk to my local voting place, chat with people I know, vote, chat a bit more, then walk home. Perhaps half an hour, if I’m feeling chatty.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s probably a blue area in a red state. They intentionally open fewer polling places there as a voter suppression tactic, hoping people will see the line and figure their vote doesn’t have enough weight to justify the time.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I just mail my vote, mail comes in fill in form and mail goes out.

      It takes 5mins out of my day tops

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I also vote by mail and it usually takes me longer in non-presidential years because there’s more offices to vote for and zero local campaigning. So I have to creep on people on social media to know if I’m comfortable with them having the powers of prothonotary.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s so much “fun” with all those tiny local offices. “Okay who is this person?”

          Zero public web presence about them at all.

          It’d be nice if there was something like Ballotpedia but public owned. “You want to run for an office? You need to fill out this profile.”

          I imagine lots of people are just like “Eh, this name sounds pretty.” Lol

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I came here to say the same thing. Like I’ve waited behind a few people before in Cananda but a line going out the door and down the street is insane

    • CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Where I live, we had early voting for a whole month now. We went during the second week - 0 minute wait. It took longer to walk into the building and follow the signs than it was to get my ballot, vote, and walk out.

    • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is what voter suppression looks like.

      I grew up in Missouri before moving to Washington state. When I reached voting age, it was (and still is) ridiculously common to see polling places in rural and suburban areas with no waiting to vote. Meanwhile, in the cities (which happen to vote more democratic), you’ll see loooong lines extending outside. When voting facilities and staff are not proportionally distributed to accommodate voter density, you get shit like this; voters in different districts receiving different treatment. And people who live there never know any better to ask for something different.

      This all blew my mind after living first in a suburban area, then an urban one, and now living in a state that has done voting my mail for decades. I love voting by mail. It’s unconcionable to me at this point for people to stand for in-person voting anymore.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I vote absentee, as do most of the people I know, and after 2020, none of us are mailing our ballot back. We are taking them to the in-person voting areas and dropping them off with staff.

          In 2020, there were reports of ballots being dumped, and so far there have been reports of drop boxes set on fire and stuff… it’s hard to trust, because of republican stooges seeing chaos, and enough of a pain in the ass to fix if it gets messed up that we aren’t taking chances.

          • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mailed mine. But I also got a text that the ballot was coming and another a few days after mailing saying it was accepted and counted. I imagine it would be annoying if I had to get a new ballot because some ass caught it on fire, but probably not any more so than having to vote like in the pic.

  • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Man I left reddit to get away from the fear mongering like this, and yet here you are.

    Both parties benefit from the current system, therefore they both want to keep things the way they are.

    The system works.

    If you don’t like the current state of things, it’s not the system that needs changing, it’s the people involved in it.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Everyone knows capital-first politicians don’t actually care about us. We get it.

      I’m all 'bout that fancy praxis and mutual aid and all those lofty but pure concepts we definitely need to be working on. But we live in a society here.

      Not voting right now is giving an out-and-out fascist a ridiculous amount of power to start crushing and punishing anybody with a different opinion.

      We’re doing what we can with what we have to soften the blow, so we can actually have the chance to work on the higher concepts like “changing the people involved in it.”

      I’d much rather be on the ground convincing people to form unions to safely backtalk their bosses, rather than rallying up guerilla units amidst a “boogaloo” because a bunch of hateful and uneducated people put a screeching orange baby on a throne who refused to leave and became “holy immortal emperor.”

      Lmao hyperbole aside. Seriously. Standing on the sidelines and going “hmph” is basically a vote for things that are likely Very Bad For You™.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        …and yet they’ve had power before - several times, including once with it being literally this dipshit - and haven’t burned it all down to gain power yet.

        But then this election is different, it’s the most important election of our lifetimes, just like the Democrats have said about every other election since at least 2004. Down to the literal phrase “the most important election of our lifetimes.”

        The reality is both major parties benefit from the system, and both market based on fear because they don’t have anything positive to offer voters that isn’t an outright lie that the voters know is an outright lie. The big difference is the the GOP markets on fear of the other and the Dems market on fear of the GOP.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You’re not wrong about how they operate.

          But there’s absolutely far reaching consequences to major decisions by leaders in power. Don’t fool yourself thinking “It hasn’t burned down yet” just because it’s not a Hollywood societal-collapse movie before your eyes.

          Work sucks more than ever for us now. Know why? Long-dead Reagan absolutely destroyed workers’ rights and established precedents that put bosses much higher on society’s totem pole. Recessions happened. People get desperate and forget that they even HAD rights as workers. Clawing this back is the battle of our time at home.

          Before that? FDR’s New Deal actually secured quite a bit of prosperity for people amidst a complete disaster. People still benefit from Social Security to this day, even if only a little.

          Teddy Roosevelt established the National Park system. Now we’re happy we don’t have luxury apartments in the middle of Yosemite or Yellowstone, or fast food chains all along the Grand Canyon. (Or it hasn’t been used as a landfill or something because the hole was already dug so it saves costs!)

          Citizen’s United is why we have trillions of dollars in shadow-money funding “both sides” of a broken system. (Although that wasn’t put up to vote, the people in charge were sworn in by people that were elected.)

          TL;DR: I get it. It’s all stupid, we’re all constantly lied to. That’s super lame. We know and we hate it.

          BUT:

          Votes. Have. Consequences.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I dont recall any recent president or serious canidates claiming to be “dictator for a day” or “use the miltary to go after radical left lunatics” or you know, actually attempted to insurrect and overthrow democracy once and plans on doing it again.

          But oh yeah tottally a normal everyday election.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Little bit of advice from Poland. I’ve seen this kind of mindset before.

    When liberals tell you losing will mean the end of democracy they exaggerate a lot. People grow tired of fighting with such high stakes so in the long run you just wear them out. Sure, if Trump wins things will suck definitely but it’s not the end of the world. Ultimately biggest political parties serve various oligarchs so once Dems are inevitably back some years from now you’ll notice not much is changing for you personally.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Will US under Trump be more or less of a Nazi state than, for example, under Nixon?

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          More obv. My post was a warning that a 2nd term would not be good.

          You should probably learn how to hedge your bets. What if harris doesn’t win? Would it be better or worse if we had more dems in congress for a trump pres?

          Isn’t it better if people who wouldnt show up for harris still show up to vote dems down ballot? Maybe stop attacking them over Harris and invite them to vote down ballot for dems by supporting their cause. Unless, you know, you’re pro genocide then you can fuck right off.

          Stop making harris support your identity makes you look like an asshole.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            In what ways will it be worse / more Nazi than under Nixon? Healthcare? Infrastructure? Minority rights? Black rights? Waging wars and supporting genocide in some third world country? Sorry to break it to you but US was always a borderline fascist state and that includes Democrats.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Lol exactly what you think you’ll accomplish this line of reasoning? That you’ll convince people harris is the best option for their vote? You wont.

              That entire list is better dealt at congressional and local levels of the ballot, and is entirely unrelated to the presidential ticket. Stop wasting your breath on a failed argument. Also are you sure you’re responding to the correct person? Im well aware America has/is borderline fascist.

              • misk@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I’m trying to explain to Dem voters that their moral high ground and calling everyone a Nazi will lead Republican voters to entrench in views pushed by far right even if they didn’t hold them before. Dem voters are supposed to be the smart ones so they should understand that, right?

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  So you’re arguing with a leftist to convince liberals that they’re assholes? 😵‍💫. I mean I already knew this, but okay. Not particularly interested in discussing the million ways trump is horrible.

                  Im more interested in making sure harris campaign is as rough and hard as possible because her positions are absolutely atrocious and we as voters need to leverage the conditions of our local voting environments effectively by voting strategically against her without risking trump.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not a Reddit thing, it’s happening everywhere in the US media sphere aligned with Dems. I have a horrible deja vu to how our local equivalent political party and media did exact same things and lost badly and couldn’t get back into power for nearly 10 years. Not that I’m a big fan of them either but if we had two party system I’d begrudgingly vote for those guys so I can sympathise somewhat. I’m trying to convince at least some people that this is not the way to go.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It absolutely will be the end of the world for the women who die when an abortion could have saved them, for the immigrants dumped back into their war torn countries, and for the trans people that are forcibly detransitioned who then kill themselves because of the horror.

      Spoken like a true cis white male.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Look, if people vote for Trump then maybe they want it that way or don’t care? Is this really the most important thing when people die due to fucking horrid state of US healthcare in general?

        I was a head mod of primary polish subreddit and had to resign due to my hard stance of treating calls to criminalise abortion as hate speech because essentially it is a call to unequal access to medical care. Please don’t question my good intentions, you don’t know me.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trump has also tried to cut medicare several times, while Harris wants to put a cap on out-of-pocket prescription prices and actually improve things instead of blaming everything on immigrants.

          I don’t appreciate your whataboutism. You’re arguing like it’s one or the other, bodily autonomy or better healthcare. The goal should be both. They’re not conflicting issues.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I understand what you feel, I was there too accusing others of „symmetrism”. You don’t want to see critique of your side or pointing out that others might not be entirely wrong because you feel like everything you do contributes in some small way to which side will win. But this only leads to dishonesty and overt hyperboles. You’ll be frustrated, anxious and sad when you lose so don’t do that to yourself.

            Maybe people voting for Trump don’t care about public healthcare because they don’t trust doctors in general. Maybe they feel that the entire healthcare industry is there to scam them and putting public money would be a waste. They’re probably wrong but you need to consider what led people to vote for someone that promises to dismantle the whole system. Maybe the root cause is something different and that’s what needs addressing first?

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Pretty sure they had similar things to say about Bush-Cheney 2004, but now look. The Harris campaign enthusiastically accepted Cheney’s endorsement. I think they all need to go in the contraption, but liberals have no credibility.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Trump is litterally the one telling people that. “Im going to be dictator for a day”. “Vote for me and you’ll never have to vote again”. “We need to use the miltary to rid of the radicals”.

      If you’re truely polish, you should be well aware of what a man that says these things can do.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Do you believe everything Trump says? Is he somehow that one politician that’s going to keep his promises no matter how hard they are to implement? Do you believe everything Harris says?

        I’m Polish so I have a good estimate of how this is going to go. Trump is copying Orban / Kaczyński. Dems are copying Tusk who is seen as one to stop illiberal democracy in EU.

        If Dems lose they will say every single thing Trump does is an attack on democracy, even if there are rare instances of a broken clock is right twice a day. Ultimately this will erode trust in politics and public institutions even more. Then once Dems are back at the wheel they will want to remain in power so some of the bad things Trump did but people found okay will suddenly be okay. Been there, done that.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          “I’m going to shoot you in the face” - Man who can’t stop lying if their life depended on it.

          “I don’t believe you” - Last words of person shot in face.

          shocked pikachu face
          Maybe lets not risk it.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Yeah, I was shot by Trump to death twice yesterday. Try to get down go actual issues rather than whatever it is that you’re doing.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          When someone walks up to you with a gun pointed at your head threatening to end your life. Do you ignore them and carry on as if nothing is happening?

          Doesnt matter if they have no intention of causing harm, the threat needs to be treated as it were real because it absolutely can be real.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Nobody is pointing a gun at your head, you’re using an unnecessary and unproductive hyperbole. This kind of escalation is what’s going to erode remaining usefulness of political debate.

            I really hate to be the bearer of bad news. I don’t want any of this to happen. I hope others will learn from our mistakes.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              The same ccouldve been said for 1933 Germany. There were plenty of people then saying “he doesn’t really mean it. He’s just trying to rile up the masses for votes”. 6 years later they were rolling tanks through your country.

              Dont ever be compilict to someone making threats.

              • misk@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Or, maybe, it’s a bit of an overreaction and you don’t live in the ascent of new Nazi Germany but because you’re so hysterical now nobody is going to treat you seriously when actual bad things happen. Also been there, done that. I’m saying this with your best interest in mind because we already made those mistakes.

                Unfortunately US might be fucked due to two party system but the actual solution to your troubles is honest debate. Try to listen to what Trump voters are afraid of. Some of their concerns are probably valid but they have been misled by shrewd politicians. They won’t regain trust by treating them like children. Or nazis.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      People grow tired of fighting with such high stakes so in the long run you just wear them out

      This is true.

      Sure, if Trump wins things will suck definitely but it’s not the end of the world. Ultimately biggest political parties serve various oligarchs so once Dems are inevitably back some years from now you’ll notice not much is changing for you personally.

      This is where I vehemently disagree. Just because you’re not going to be one of the first ones they target doesn’t mean it’s no big deal. They’re talking about using our local police to round millions of people up and put them in camps, and you’re going to sit there and tell me it’s not the end of the world? Get the fuck out of here.

      It’s okay to be tired. Fight anyway. That is what is required to maintain Democracy. Giving in to authoritarianism because it’s easier is a bitch move.

        • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          He’s talking about deporting millions of illegal immigrants, which will probably require putting them in a camp at least temporarily.

          • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            So the “camps” side of things definitely feels gross, but he’s “threatening” to enforce the law, that’s not wrong. Now if he’s weaponizing the system to deport his opposition or otherwise law abiding citizens, that’s a problem.

            • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              A lot of the people he wants to deport are people claiming asylum because the country they come from is too dangerous to be in. Letting those people stay here while they plead their case is one of our lawful treaty obligations. Rounding them up and summarily deporting them is not enforcing the law it’s abrogating the law.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              He has promised to deport pro-palestine protesters.

              Most of whom are born Americans.

              You’re not paying attention. The camps are for far more than just the undocumented.

              • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Okay, but legally he can’t do that. No matter how much he wants to. And once again, orders are as only good as the people who are tasked with carrying them out.

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Sigh people who think a piece of paper with ink scribbles will protect them… 😮‍💨

                  Presidents issue orders against the law all the time and they’re carried out. The damage is done before the issue even hits a court room and then you assume that the judge is willing to risk their life to protect your rights? 😂

                • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s worth noting here that the President, as per the supreme Court, is immune from all prosecution if his actions result from the scope of his duties. It would be trivial for Trump to argue that deporting everybody he doesn’t like is within the scope of his duties, whether it’s lawful or not. That’s the unique danger we face right now: a combination of a strong man and a uniquely deferential SCOTUS. It’s never happened in American history.

                • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  He’s a literal criminal who has filled the courts with his minons and the police love him.

                  Who’s going to stop him? Seriously who?

                  His term this time is going to be worse than last time because he and the republican party have removed all the ways we have to stop him from doing whatever the fuck he wants.

                  Official acts are completely legal now. He can order protesters executed and the supreme court already said that’s fine.

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          The president has supreme authority over the executive branch, which includes the military. Trump has explicitly said that he would implement mass deportations, and has called democrats “the enemy within” while in the same breath saying that the national guard could be used to put them in prison.

          As for who’s going to let it happen, that would be all of the Trump sychophants that he will be appointing. He learned last time that appointing republicans isn’t enough to let him get away with his batshit crazy ideas, they have to be cult loyalists as well.

          • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            I don’t think he should be in charge of anything, but even if he were I can’t imagine there are enough people willing to follow those orders to actually carry them out.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        This is where I vehemently disagree. Just because you’re not going to be one of the first ones they target doesn’t mean it’s no big deal. They’re talking about using our local police to round millions of people up and put them in camps, and you’re going to sit there and tell me it’s not the end of the world? Get the fuck out of here.

        Your mistake is believing any politician, Trump included. He says crazy stuff to win votes, not to actually implement it. This is true of libs in general as well.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You haven’t been paying attention. Trump tried to implement this stuff last time and was stopped by people loyal to the Constitution. ALL of those people are gone. He is surrounded by people who WILL carry out his orders. Trump rarely learns, but he has absolutely learned a lesson when it comes to staffing.

          This is true of libs in general as well

          This is a ridiculous attempt to both sides. Give us an example. What compares to “we’re going to detain and deport millions of people”?

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I’m not interested in political theatre, I judge based on outcomes because it’s impossible to know intent.

            In Poland libs were very up their arms about human rights abuse against migrants on the Belarusian border. Just months after they got back into power they formally suspended ability to request asylum (mandated by Geneva convention and EU basic rights charter). Similar stuff in France as well.