• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      Why would it? OpenSUSE isn’t a good choice for a base system it is fairly obscure and the base is rather large.

      • ijhoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        They have been a supporter / promoter of KDE for a long time, would seem logical to me that KDE would go with suse.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          Suse isn’t well suited for a minimal base system. You would want something like Arch or Debian and in this case they went with Arch.

    • moonpiedumplings
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Opensuse doesn’t have rpm-ostree. Their immutable offerings are just snapper/btrfs snapshots before changes to the system.

      Such a setup is nowhere near as powerful. rpm-ostree can rebase itself based off of a container/oci image. It can layer images on top of eachother. Rather than just tracking when changes happened, it can also track what change happened, in a git style setup.

        • moonpiedumplings
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Oops… my bad. In my earlier comment I assumed that this would be a Fedora/Ublue based distro, rather than an Arch one. Arch doesn’t have RPM ostree either (which makes me dislike it as a choice for an immutable distro).

          But, it’s highly likely that with the steam deck and other projects, there is already an ecosystem for immutable Arch, and a minimal base system to start is advantageous, as Possibly Linux said.