• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The AIPAC donations in the primary went to Nikki Hailey. Trump started receiving his cheques after he defeated her.

          Is he in their pocket now? Of course. But he was not their preferred pick.

          • Midnitte@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Do you really need me to Google for you why the Golan Heights president is likely a worse outcome for the citizens of Gaza?

            Fine, how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

            Anyone who thinks the Muslim-ban president is a good outcome for Gaza only cares about the real estate value of Gaza.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

              Oh you mean exactly like right now?

              Anyone who thinks that orange man is an improvement is an idiot. But anyone who thinks Kamala would be better is also an idiot.

              Israel is already getting everything they could ever wish for. There is nothing that Trump could offer that they’re not already getting, including protection from the international community.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Why wouldn’t they? You made yourself fascists by chasing him but that doesn’t change the fact that he was there before you. Of course they prefer him. Just like the American fascist voters you failed to swing.

          Being a loser doesn’t absolve you.

            • Sam Tamaskan@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Of course, ignore all the rhetoric of trump and is ilk so you can call the other guy racist. That certainly seals the argument

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Please take a step back, take a few breaths, and try to be coherent to the context you’re replying.

                If I were you I would either recant my position or be VERY offended that I was accused with merit of being a white supremacist. You singled out as a distinction that the bad things would happen here. To people like you. Fairly explicit that should mean something more than the lives that aren’t yours.

                This is definitional chauvinism.

                Wanna take another crack at replying now?