• lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sounds great, but as far as I know Diffie–Hellman doesn’t protect from MitM attack if there’s no trusted party to prove the integrity of keys sent. I skimmed through the description but this seems not to touch on that theme. Maybe it’s sharing public keys in person time again.

  • devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy molly. Maidsafe, now that’s a name I haven’t heard in ages. Lot’s of cool and strong primitives and ideas they are building on.

  • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would love to like this but it doesn’t provide anything more secure than the apps out there that already have end to end encryption like Signal. It doesn’t stop a govt storing the data to decrypt later. They broke TOR and they can break this too eventually.

    • snaggenOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It remove the central server, which is often the single point of failure. So even if it doesn’t add more security than signal, it adds resilience. And this is not Tor in the way that its not a proxy, its a framework to build secure peer to peer applications.