• 3ntranced@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Could you explain to me how biologically this isn’t factual? The baby doesn’t pop out with a penis and the doctor go “congratulations! It’s a girl with a penis!”

      Fucking delusional, you want to shift your hormones and swap sexy bits as an adult? More power to you. Wanna let undeveloped children cause irreversible damage to their body because they had a phase where they liked to cross dress? Get fucked, it’s absurd we let 18 year olds even apply to college or vote.

      • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What’s absurd is how you’ve formed a strong negative opinion despite it being pretty obvious you’re completely clueless about the details of the topic.

        Kids aren’t just given puberty blockers immediately at their request. A lot of work is done prior, with the parent(s) and medical and mental health providers determining the validity of the situation and working with the child to determine the course of treatment, if any.

        It’s fine to disagree, but at least educate yourself first. Otherwise you’re just another bigot.

      • stembolts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        1 in 1,700 people are born with both sexual organs.

        If extrapolated to the population of the United States that is 10% of the population of Nebraska that cannot be defined in this manner.

        Therefore, that statement is not biologically factual as thousands of people have both.

        Since this is a UK forum, the UK has 40,000 citizens who cannot be defined male or female in this manner.


        Onto your point about manipulating gender at a young age.

        The largest number of gender reassignment surgeries are performed on the population I just described, without their consent, at birth. And believe it or not often doctors get it wrong.

        Someone assigned female by a doctor as a baby, well turns out mentally they are a boy, a boy who had their penis removed at birth. That might have some affect on a person, I think you’d agree.

        So with that in mind, I agree with you about one thing, that non-reversible gender decisions should not be made without the consent of the individual being assigned a gender, as doctors are currently doing to intersex babies on a regular basis.

        So can we stop pretending that gender reassignement is the problem? It’s just a wedge issue designed and promoted to keep the lower classes divided so that we don’t realize what the rich are doing to us and this planet. I am not your enemy. We are allies. The enemy is up/down, not left/right.

        Transgender people just want to exist. Is it an unreasonable demand to exist and be acknowledged? I think not.

        • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I understand your sentiment and I dont want to come off as just “transbasher” because i have close both male and female friends who after college decided they wanted to transition. I don’t agree with their thought process but I don’t tell them or put them down for their choice because it’s their choice as an adult.

          On the subject of intersex births, I find the 1 in 1700 to be very generous. Having a mother who has worked labor and delivery for the past 30 years in a large hospital, she has only ever had 2 instances where the baby was born intersex. And that’s out of tens of thousands of deliveries. In those fringe cases I think sure we can allow those to be allowed to transition because there is a biological reason evident from birth. But if you just have a hormone imbalance that doesn’t mean you need to block the natural course of growth to see “what you’d prefer”. Just let the body do it’s thing and when it’s done developing then mess around with it.

      • Coriza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Wanna let undeveloped children cause irreversible damage to their body because they had a phase where they liked to cross dress?

        This hilarious argument if wasn’t just a bad faith argument should be enough for everyone be in favor of puberty blockers, to avoid avoid irreversible change while the person matures and can decide what one wants to do.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Let’s hope that allows many kids access to the care they need. If there’s a real concern about the safety of puberty blockers, then clinical trials are exactly what’s needed to find out. I’m not entirely convinced this is really due to medical concern though. It smells like Labour trying to out-bigot the Conservatives, just to prove they’re not lefties any more.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        My understanding is by medical standards, the evidence is pretty low quality, which is why GnRH agonists aren’t approved by the EMA, MHRA, FDA, or NICE for gender dysphoria.

        It highlights a wider issue in medicine though, the obsession with randomised controlled trials, which is basically the only evidence the GRADE method considers “high quality”. We are seeing exactly the same problem with MDMA assisted therapy, any therapy where blinding is difficult is dismissed by the medical establishment. NICE dismissed (es)ketamine for depression for the same reason. Add to that the fact that GnRH agonists are off patent, so there’s no incentive for industry to fund studies.

        • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          My understanding is by medical standards, the evidence is pretty low quality,

          Your understanding is wrong and influenced by transphobic rhetoric, not “medical standards”, which have considered puberty blockers safe and effective since at least the 1980s.

          The use of puberty blockers is supported by twelve major American medical associations, including the American Medical Association,[14] the American Psychological Association,[15] and the American Academy of Pediatrics.[16] the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,[17] the Pediatric Endocrine Society,[18] the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,[19] the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists,[20] and the American College of Physicians.[21] In Australia four medical organizations support them,[22] as does the Endocrine Society,[23] and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).[24]

          Overall, puberty blockers have demonstrated an excellent safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of precocious puberty. The most common side effects reported include nonspecific headaches, hot flashes, and implant-related skin reactions.[39]

          source

          E: and before you try throwing bone density at me, most of the people impacted are cis (and will not be stopped from taking blockers), and either way, there is simple treatment to counteract this minor issue (and which is completely insignificant when compered to the alternative). The ban is 100% motivated by transphobia and cruelty.

  • darthsid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Will this finally settle the debate so we can focus on more pressing issues?

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It has settled the debate - our government hates trans people, and is actively withholding our human rights and going out of its way to harm us.

      If that isn’t a pressing issue to you, you are part of the problem and a transphobe.

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      No because this was clearly the wrong decision to come to.

      #SorryNotSorry you can’t silence the LGBT community that easily.

    • RedSeries@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is your life a debate to be settled? Could you kill yourself and settle that debate for me?