Like the question above am I just an old man that’s not keeping up with the times or is terminator still a great terminal to use in 2025?

    • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Another happy Kitty user here!

      I use my terminal as an IDE. Kitty makes it (relatively) easy to write custom interactive applets (aka kittens) that open in new panes or communicate between panes. The ssh integration is also really useful: whenever I ssh into my remote work station my fish and helix config gets copied over.

      Judging by the code (a mix of C, python, and go) and the fast release rate, the core maintainer seems to be an utter mad genius – which unfortunately is sometimes reflected in his notoriously abrasive communication style.

      Only thing I’m lacking is persistent remote sessions. The maintainer is not quiet about his dislike of tmux and other multiplexers. It’s wildly inefficient to process every byte twice, he argues. Convincing but Kitty doesn’t currently offer an alternative for remote sessions, which is where I do most of my work. Wezterm has something for this in beta, but misses many of the niceties of Kitty. So I’m still using tmux for everything in Kitty, because it trips me up to have one way of working with panes locally and another way when working remotely.

      I tried Ghostty, if only because the maintainer is an excellent communicator. I found it polished but simple. I couldn’t figure out how to page up the scrollback or search it. I couldn’t rename tab titles. The config format seemed under-documented. I’ll give it another go in a month or so.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I must be older and even more out of touch than you are, as I only use the default Terminal that came with my distro and I had to do a search to check what were Ghostty and Terminator (I know about the movie, obviously, but I’m also old enough to have been watching it in theatre the year it was first released ;)

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m like a generation younger than you at least and I’m on the default terminal and tmux train, so I’m saying you’re not out of touch.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Use whatever you like. You know your needs better than anybody else. As for me, I like Konsole and I will stick to that.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d like to think there’s a difference between “keeping up with the times” and chasing whatever new thing gets advertised.

    Unless you’re really into number chasing with benchmarks then just keep using whatever you like until something YOU find better comes along.

    Also I’m GenZ and just use whatever comes with the DE, it’s not an old person thing shakes fist.

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    On my Mac, I use Retroterm because emulates Old CRT screens - with scan lines and ghosting and stuff .

    Does nothing , crashes sometimes, but is Lots of fun if you’re the guy that remembers floppies.

    • Tundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      theres a cool preset called “futuristic” on the linux version (cool retro term) -with a bit of tweaking you can make it look like a terminal from the alien franchise

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m no connoisseur, but I just want the same feel as I had back in the 90s. No terminal emulator, straight up tty with crisp VGA ROM fonts at some hacky SuperVGA resolution. Before the virtual framebuffer that basically every computer today uses for tty.

    Konsole, gnome-terminal and ghostty can all be made to feel right to me. I’m giving ghostty a spin, and I like how it supports custom shaders so I can make it feel even more like home.

    • lordnikon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol zerocool is around here too. I have him tagged it’s always fun when we meet in a thread.

  • dharmik@linuxusers.in
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Multiple GNOME terminals in one window!

    Terminator was originally developed by Chris Jones in 2007 as a simple, 300-ish line python script. Since then, it has become The Robot Future of Terminals. Originally inspired by projects like quadkonsole and gnome-multi-term and more recently by projects like Iterm2, and Tilix, It lets you combine and recombine terminals to suit the style you like. If you live at the command-line, or are logged into 10 different remote machines at once, you should definitely try out Terminator.

    terminator sounds great. never heard of it. i did try ghostty, but i can’t help myself opening xfce terminal. muscle memory.

  • TechnoCat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I switched from terminator to alacritty a while back. Moved to kitty a few months until a bug was fixed. I do try out new terminals occasionally, but nothing feels as nice as alacritty to me so i stay.

  • Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use foot which is Wayland aware and renders Unicode fonts. Honestly I don’t need much from the terminal itself as I’m usually in tmux to deal with all the “tabs” and scrollback.

    • chtk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. Pretty much all of the above.

      I used to rely on Sway for terminal tabs and splits. Only recently did I realize that tmux is the better option, even for local use. Already used tmux for SSH sessions.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        for terminal tabs and splits. Only recently did I realize that tmux is the better option, even for local use

        Reasoning?

        • chtk@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago
          • Muscle memory. I already did development on remote machines in nvim.
          • If I start tmux in the root of a project, then every new pane or window I open automatically starts in that directory. So no need to cd to the root for every new shell session I start.
  • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m an old man. I don’t get the appeal of a terminal with hardware acceleration and all that fancy stuff. I use what the distro/DE came with.

        • mnmalst@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Exactly. You invoke it with xfce4-terminal --drop-down

          If you set that as a shortcut in xfce, the first call will start it and recurring calls will show the running instance.

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    From a look at the documentation it’s just a fancy terminal. If you don’t really care about theming or image rendering then it’s not something you need. If you’re trying to rice a UI like hyprland then it looks like a good option.

    Personally, I don’t see much added value over whatever the default terminal is but I’ve never been one to mess with things that do what they are supposed to.

  • xavier666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The main advantages I have felt with fancy terminals are

    • GPU accelerated means scrolling feels smoother
    • Nice single configuration file for the terminal which I can easily move around
    • Launches slightly faster. Only noticeable when you are launching multiple terminals
    • 7dev7random7@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Launches faster sounds like you have a weird shell config.

      Also scrolling isn’t really existing in a terminal. If you are tail -f somefile then it depends on how fast it is written to, how fast tail is. If you have some TUI tool open it dependa how fast it can emit it’s UI.

      If your program only emits 100MB data each seconds then a terminal sink of 30GB/s wouldn’t really benefit.

      Power users like me run a terminal multiplexer anyways so there is another bottleneck.

      And the configuration is onetime only (if the terminal configuration will be downward compatible with a version 10 years from now).

  • Serge Matveenko@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Terminator isn’t supported anymore as far as I remember. A good substitution for it is Tilix. I’d been using the latter for a while but recently I switched to the new default terminal in Fedora (it had weird name that I unable to remember) and Tilling Shell extension for Gnome.