• zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When I tried Arch in '23, it worked well. Then I got busy and lazy and didn’t use it for 2-3 months. When I came back and did yay -sYu as I had learned, dozens of KDE and core packages were throwing errors and wouldn’t update. Unfortunate.

        • bitwaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          yay -Syu, and around that time KDE had switched from plasma 5 to plasma 6, which involved moving a lot of packages into the extra repository, so you had to sit there and confirm each package move (unless you used --noconfirm).

      • ulterno
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I do it whenever I feel like. Don’t even feel the need to be regular.

        With Win10, the notifications used to increase my tension

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mint is one of the best versions of Ubuntu you could possibly use. They give you Ubuntu without all the forced snaps and other crap.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fair enough, but Mint gives you the more up to date base of Ubuntu and some QoL tools that Debian doesn’t have. If you prefer Debian, then use it. I just feel Mint is better for beginners or people who want an easier time with less tinkering.

          • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Debian was good enough for my grandfather and it’s good enough for me. Seriously, running cinnamon desktop in Debian is my best option.

            I don’t need fancy, just no breaking

            Plot twist: am grandfather myself

            • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              That’s awesome. While I don’t share your love for Debian, I’m glad it exists. Without it, we wouldn’t have Ubuntu or Mint or a ton of other choices.

              It’s also amazing that it works, as-is, for some people. More options just means more possibilities for people to find something that works for them and that’s what’s important.

              • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Ever since docker became available, along with flatpak; the Linux running these became less of an issue for me

                  • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    I have to use some programming tools and languages to code; installing them side by side and updating was a major hassle. Now I just have some aliases in command prompt.

                    Docket desktop was a major religious experience for me; much easier than before

            • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Which is an excellent option if you’re okay with Debian. It’s a good OS but lacks some of the homegrown tools from the main Mint version. So, for beginners or those less inclined to tinkering I’d still recommend the main edition. Otherwise yes, Debian Edition is another great option.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And if so, I can’t for the life of me Invision how it’s harder on Arch than on the Ubuntu or its derivatives.

            • bitwaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 minutes ago

              That’s the real “difference” in the Linux camps right?

              Ubuntu N00bs - “what’s a terminal?” vs. Arch, Gentoo, Nix, etc users who despite whatever camp you’re in you know you can tell them “you need to enable the systemd service” or "add option blah to /etc/program.conf and they know what they means without further explanation.

    • JATth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Arch maintenance: 0. Install it once. (The proper way)

      1. Every 2 weeks minimum pacman -Syu
      2. Every 3 months merge/update configs in /etc.

      I don’t get what is with this so hard? Yes, configs can be undecipherable but 90% time the merge involves just deleting the .pacnew versions.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You say maintenance is 0 then list 2 things I don’t have to do on Mint

        Remembering to bother with a CLI and configs is the hard part, on Mint I get a nice GUI with reminders that I have updates to things. You know, like it’s some time past the year 2000?

      • Aelis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        On EndavourOS here, I spent hours upon install tinkering and setting everything like I wanted and forgot most of what I did ever since.

        I’m so lazy I use a one word alias to update all my stuff in one go. I rarely have to bother myself reading and checking if everything’s fine (I still do it from time to time just to be safe but I do it less and less because it’s almost useless)… I even update a bit late sometimes and quite randomly in general.

        It’s been almost 4 years like this now, nothing ever broke, had an issue with an Aur only once…never even had to tinker with anything.

        I remember having harder times with Ubuntu or Manjaro like a decade ago…even had freaking issues with Mint, it’s crazy.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Running pacman every two weeks seems like a bad idea if you have a lot of packages… The dependencies can get dicey if you have to update too many at once.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The problem is that other 10% where I have to spend my time trawling the arch wiki to fix my OS instead of like… doing cool things on my computer. If that’s what you enjoy that’s great, but your hobby is not my hobby. I’ve used arch on several of my devices, it can be great! But there’s this idea that arch is the perfect solution to pretty much everyone’s desktop problems and it’s crazymaking to see repeated over and over on here.

      • Really_long_toes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I started on Ubuntu, got acclimated to Linux using it, went to mint, didn’t give me what I wanted and just dove into arch, been running the same install for 8 years now and honestly don’t want any more from my os… I also love my steam deck… It runs arch BTW 😉