• octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    No FLOSS loving Linux user is dead to me, not even the GNOME project team, and frankly I suspect it’s noobies and non-users pushing these memes lately.

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe I should go back to linux. I used to get frustrated at having to reinit my bt every damn boot…

      • ulterno
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        I do it whenever I feel like. Don’t even feel the need to be regular.

        With Win10, the notifications used to increase my tension

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Mint is one of the best versions of Ubuntu you could possibly use. They give you Ubuntu without all the forced snaps and other crap.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Fair enough, but Mint gives you the more up to date base of Ubuntu and some QoL tools that Debian doesn’t have. If you prefer Debian, then use it. I just feel Mint is better for beginners or people who want an easier time with less tinkering.

            • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Which is an excellent option if you’re okay with Debian. It’s a good OS but lacks some of the homegrown tools from the main Mint version. So, for beginners or those less inclined to tinkering I’d still recommend the main edition. Otherwise yes, Debian Edition is another great option.

    • JATth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Arch maintenance: 0. Install it once. (The proper way)

      1. Every 2 weeks minimum pacman -Syu
      2. Every 3 months merge/update configs in /etc.

      I don’t get what is with this so hard? Yes, configs can be undecipherable but 90% time the merge involves just deleting the .pacnew versions.

      • Aelis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        On EndavourOS here, I spent hours upon install tinkering and setting everything like I wanted and forgot most of what I did ever since.

        I’m so lazy I use a one word alias to update all my stuff in one go. I rarely have to bother myself reading and checking if everything’s fine (I still do it from time to time just to be safe but I do it less and less because it’s almost useless)… I even update a bit late sometimes and quite randomly in general.

        It’s been almost 4 years like this now, nothing ever broke, had an issue with an Aur only once…never even had to tinker with anything.

        I remember having harder times with Ubuntu or Manjaro like a decade ago…even had freaking issues with Mint, it’s crazy.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You say maintenance is 0 then list 2 things I don’t have to do on Mint

        Remembering to bother with a CLI and configs is the hard part, on Mint I get a nice GUI with reminders that I have updates to things. You know, like it’s some time past the year 2000?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Running pacman every two weeks seems like a bad idea if you have a lot of packages… The dependencies can get dicey if you have to update too many at once.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The problem is that other 10% where I have to spend my time trawling the arch wiki to fix my OS instead of like… doing cool things on my computer. If that’s what you enjoy that’s great, but your hobby is not my hobby. I’ve used arch on several of my devices, it can be great! But there’s this idea that arch is the perfect solution to pretty much everyone’s desktop problems and it’s crazymaking to see repeated over and over on here.

      • Really_long_toes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, I started on Ubuntu, got acclimated to Linux using it, went to mint, didn’t give me what I wanted and just dove into arch, been running the same install for 8 years now and honestly don’t want any more from my os… I also love my steam deck… It runs arch BTW 😉

  • comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    12 hours ago

    As an old crusty Slackware user and UNIX admin, IDGAF what Linux distro people use; using any of them is a step in the right direction.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I just use Linux Mint Debian Edition for my study laptop, sounds pretty much the same - in over a year of use, I have literally never had a single problem with it (other than things directly caused by me like leftover fstab entries for testing). I know it’s what Debian is renowned for but god damn that is a stable operating system.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          That’s fair. Personally, I use Debian for my little home server, but it’s not a desktop OS for me.

          Nice thing about linux is we don’t have to agree. We’re free to use whatever we want.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You would be genuenly suprised how good of a desktop OS it is, granted the packaged are old but keep in mind you can use repo packages for stability and flatpak for up to date software

            • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m sure it’s perfecly fine as a desktop OS. It’s just not for me. I prefer more up to date software, so I recommend Mint to anyone asking, but use Endeavour (Arch, BTW) myself. I finally understand why people are always singing the praises of the AUR.

              Also, if I’m going to lean into Flatpak as a packaging system, I’m gonna use it as an excuse to properly try an immutable system and see how I get along with it.

              Now, all of this is purely my own opinion. Other people can use and like what suits them. I’m not trying to gatekeep or be an elitist. I’m an absolute noob myself.

                • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  In that case, I’d still recommend Mint or Mint Debian Edition unless the person knows what they want. Then Debian would be absolutely fine.

    • Sternout@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He’s not wrong though. Historically left parties have been more splintered than right ones.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    As an Arch user, whatever suits you.

    I installed Arch on my ThinkPad because.............................................................................................. uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhh.................... I had an Arch sticker and I felt like I couldn’t use it if I didn’t use Arch.

    Everyone has some reasons for their favorite distro.

    • Tyoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I use Arch, and I have an OpenSUSE wallpaper.

      Before this, I used Mint and had an Arch wallpaper…

      I live to offend.

  • MajorHavoc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I love it. This made me laugh.

    But, as this month’s chair of the of the Linux User Group for Letting Everyone Know We Hate Snaps (LUG LEKWHS), I want to clarify that we don’t have a problem with Ubuntu users.

    It’s Canonical we have a beef with.

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    me as an arch user when I have to use ubuntu for work: arthur-fist-clench.gif