• MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    because they aren’t eaten for dessert

    This sounds to me like a reasonable way to disqualify something as a culinary fruit.

    Folks like to make a big hullabaloo about tomatoes being technically a fruit, but no one gives a second thought about referring to peppers, cucumbers, green beans, eggplant, avocado, pumpkins & other squash, or corn on-the-cob as vegetables even though they are all technically fruit.

    And I was being picky there, because beans, peas, grains and nuts are all also technically fruit. Heck, lots of “nuts” like peanuts and cashews aren’t even really nuts.

    Keep your taxonomy out of my kitchen:

    • Fruit are sweet.
    • Vegetables are not.
    • Grains make bread.
    • Herbs and spices add a lot of flavor with a little bit. Herbs are the green ones.
    • nuts are. They just are. Don’t think about it too hard.
    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think this is more about which definitions to use for the purpose of tariffs than which definitions these things fall under.

    • expr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lemons and limes? And there are many naturally sweet vegetables, such as carrots, peas, sweet corn, etc.

      It’s also not a reasonable way to disqualify something as a fruit, both because tomatoes themselves are used for a lot of different desserts, and because many other botanical fruits are used to make desserts, such as pumpkins, avocado, corn, red beans, etc.