• celeste@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I haven’t seen enough of the evidence to know. I feel like everyone in power has decided he’s guilty, but there hasn’t been a trial. I don’t think it’s wrong for people to have their opinions on a personal level about his guilt, but I am not willing to at this point. Honestly I was leaning towards guilty until I saw how the cops were parading him around. I don’t trust that behavior.

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    I believe he deserves a presumption of innocence as is his constitutional and human right.

    • shutz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unlikely, but there’s always jury nullification. Which I just realized would be recorded as a “not guilty” verdict, though the implication is “he did it, but we think it’s OK”

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t have an opinion on if he was the shooter. I do have the opinion that the shooter is an American hero though.

  • PearOfDees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    No I don’t believe he is the shooter, even if he is the shooter he should be found not guilty. Those CEOs caused millions of deaths with their denial claims, that man got what he had coming "unfortunately. "

  • SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Call me jaded but I am not predisposed to take the NYPD at their word.

    People seem to forget about the innocent until proven guilty part, the raw amount of perjury with the theater surrounding this person is mind-numbing. If he makes it out of this he will be come a billionaire out of defamation alone, almost all mainstream news sources treated his guilt as a foregone conclusion with barely an “allegedly” in sight.

  • m_f@discuss.onlineM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Likely him IMO. Very unlikely that they’ll be able to go through a highly-publicized trial with broad support for him and pin the wrong guy, so my general attitude is “let’s see what happens”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    No, but it doesn’t really matter. The government has selected its scapegoat. I just hope that the jurors understand what jury nullification is before they go in. Gawd knows the courts don’t want anyone funding out.