• ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s sad that even the idea of a very high tax rate for even the top 0.1% is off the table. I really like the suggestion of capping net worth at $999 million and the government gets the rest.

    • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How does that work when for example a single company is worth two billion? Does the government now own >50% of it?

      • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Easiest implementation would be shares start getting shared to all other employees. No more big owner when profits come from the laborers.

        • SippyCup@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Could you imagine the talent pool the most profitable companies would have if all net profits over X billion dollars were automatically redistributed to it’s labor force? Suddenly the wealthiest middle class on earth would be in the US until then somehow clawed that money back.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They shouldn’t exist and people should stop glorifying them. This goes for the ceo of valve too.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This goes for the ceo of valve too.

      They gloat about overworking employees so they can remain short staffed

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I worked in a school with a pretty good amount of students whose families had probably not entered the country legally.

    I had a student who would be out at the end of the day. Like, yeah, lots of kids are zonked out by the last hour, and the fake sleep to watch silent TikToks was ever popular.

    But this girl was out. The bell would ring and I’d try to wake her up. Like starting with a “hey the bell just rang, time to go home.” Gently nudging her to get no response. This was routine.

    She worked a full time job at night. She didn’t get to sleep. She worked at night, she went to high school during the day.

    There have been times that I’ve had to work three jobs to survive as an adult, and I’ve worked my share of fifteen+ hour shifts with no OT because who needs labor laws?

    But that girl had to work harder to survive than any billionaire I’ve met could even conceive of (and I fucked a billionaire for quite a while). She was a child. She should have been tired because she had stayed up all night playing video games or talking to her friends - she should not have been tired because she had to have a full time job to survive as a teenager in high school.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      17 hours ago

      and I fucked a billionaire for quite a while

      Soooooooo

      Are we just glossing over this or…

      Lmao

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, I married and was economically devastated by a billionaire. Turns out, if you can afford good lawyers, you can keep the house and ditch your spouse with a hopeless amount of CC debt. Long story.

        • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Oh. Well I was totally thinking that was going to go in a “I was a secret billionaire’s mistress” sort-a-way. Not, “I have a legit supervillain backstory because of a billionaire” kinda way, sorry lol

  • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I will post this every time.

    Billionaires have an unhealthy concentration of power, but they don’t have a billion on their bank account. They own companies that are worth that much. They also aren’t necessarily assholes.

    Germany has many medium sized companies. They mostly treat their employees really well. Good pay, guaranteed jobs for their kids, etc. Many for sure are worth over a billion. And they are privately owned, so the owners are billionaires or close to it. So what is supposed to happen to those companies ownerships? Would it really be better if they are publicly owned?

    I’ve come around to think that a wealth tax is necessary, but it’s for sure complicated.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They also aren’t necessarily assholes

      Wrong buzzer noise

      They’ve accumulated multiple orders of magnitude more money than anyone will ever need. That level of greed makes you an asshole by default

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        wrong buzzer noise They don’t have lots of “money”, they have lot’s of assets. In the US they can get loans at very favorable terms based on those assets. Which is how they avoid taxes. What the german rules for this are I don’t know, but probably not the same.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I don’t see how taxation changes the balance of power. Their power is not, as you said, the size of their bank account, but in their ownership of the company’s assets. They also don’t create the company’s value with their work. The employees do.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      but they don’t have a billion on their bank account.

      You may think having cash in your pockets is better because you are poor but having billions in companies and assets or owning the bank is better.

      Germany has many medium sized companies. They mostly treat their employees really well.

      Treating slaves slightly better does not make them free men.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We need to wipe them from existence.

    Let every nation have a maximum wealth cap. 1000x the median national household income. Anything else is taxed at 100%. This cap in the US would be about $80 million today.

    But if you’re somehow in flagrant violation of this limit? If your wealth is the equivalent of over one billion 2025 dollars? Unless you quickly earn a multi-billion fortune and immediate give it away or spend it, having a net worth over $1 billion will be a felony. It will be a capital offense. Oh you’re secretly billionaire, having hid your vast illegal fortune from the IRS? You are guilty of trying to amass a geopolitically-significant level of wealth. We’re going to treat this as seriously as we would someone who attempts to build their own personal nuclear weapons. Really, you are guilty of a form of treason. Except instead of aiding a foreign nation, you were trying to become a threat to your nation yourself. And the traditional penalty for treason will be applied.

    This is the world we could have. We could, if we wanted it badly enough, simply make being a billionaire a capital offense. Force them to give away or spend most everything they have. Either way, given or spent, wealth is distributed enough so that no individual can threaten the nation through their own personal wealth.

    It is time we wiped billionaires off the face of the Earth. No individual should ever be allowed to become so wealthy that they become a threat to nation states.

    • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You realize that a single grocery store with all of its stock is likely already worth more than 1000x median income? Who does the grocery have to be sold to to pay your 100% tax?

    • Draupnir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This really shows how little you actually understand about money. Let’s say this hypothetical played out. Where do you realistically think these taxes will end up? What do you think an economically monopolistic and highly supercharged government will get you? What will happen to the quality and ubiquity of goods and services available to you?

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Not op, and any Marxist feel free to step in, but 100% tax is technically communism. And I mean full final stage communism where money no longer exists. If income is taxed at 100%, then money no longer needs to exist since… well you never really see it. The tax is spent on everything. You work if you can and everything that can be, is provided for you. Purely from an economic point of view. This is though an ideal and something that would need to be worked towards over long periods of time.

        • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m a full on no money commie. To me any society that has money is capitalist, doesn’t matter what happens to it, it’s a capitalist society once you introduce money to it. I propose a gift economy. It is the first economy recorded and is how humans should be living. We just give people what they need, not expectining anything in r eturn. No money, no bartering system. We just give anyone what they need. The gift econmmy is so engrained in human life and we do a little even when in a captalist society. Ever explained the rules to a boardgame? I imagine you did that for free, asking for nothing in return, gift economy. Helped a family member with tech support, you did that for free, asking for nothing in return. Even writing a internet comment, you likely did that for free and a lot of internet comments are written because someone asked a question, you’re helping them for nothing in return. We need to get to the gift economy.

          • Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            How do you determine who gets what they need when a given resource becomes scarce? Everything is finite. Human greed is also real. Do you just take someone at their word that they’re desperate for something when they may not be?

            • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Human greed is a problem of capitalism because it makes competition out of humanity. We can still track what people have in the gift economy. If everyone gets what they need, then there will be no greed at all and more sustainable lifestyles will be lived. Most scarcity in the world is fabricated in order to drive up the value of goods in a profit driven system like capitalism. In the case of actual scarcity in the gift economy, we would simply go on need, who needs these resources the most? Anyone that doesn’t need whatever resources wouldn’t be asking for them in the gift economy.

  • Draupnir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This assumes billionaires fell into money. Not true. The person with two jobs puts in more hours ongoing, but they either aren’t or don’t know how to actually work

      • Draupnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There’s many facets, but some core tenets are to be highly focused, highly committed, and increasingly efficient in efforts to make a goal (in the right direction) happen.

        The idea I’m thinking of explicitly here though is scaling this definition to hold increasing amounts of leverage over time. To put it simply, your continued highly focused, efficient, and effective work leads to a system where more work gets accomplished overall, and the time that you put in accomplishes much, much more.

        • RandomVideos
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          How would you define accomplishing stuff and what do you mean by accomplishing more? Does selling something to someone count? Does creating something for your own use count? Does creating entertainment for other people count? Does doing something to better your mental health count? What about doing something to better another persons mental health? Does selling an addictive product count?

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What billionaire didn’t start out with a healthy infusion of cash? Sure, some turned millions into billions, but I don’t know of any that didn’t start with a line on several millions of investment available.

      • Draupnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        • Oprah Winfrey • Howard Schultz • John Paul DeJoria • Ralph Lauren • Jan Koum • Shahid Khan • George Soros • Leonardo Del Vecchio

        Now you know. You can look up their stories yourself. Now stop perpetuating the false dogma that somehow these people are special and unique and have something that you don’t. You can do it too, you just choose not to.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You have more in common with a begging homeless guy than a billionaire. Face it, there is a class divide and we need to do something about it.

      • Draupnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Alright man so you want me to satisfy your worldview and sit and point fingers with you at the billionaires for causing you to be where you are. Okay, cool! It’s their fault bro. They steal from you and keep you down.

        Feel better? Now where are you?

        You’re living a comforting lie if you allow yourself to keep repeating this dogma to yourself, and yet you are in no better of a place in the end.

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          And what comfortable lie would that be?

          And just for reference I do have a rather comfortable live but I see the poor and miserable who need to beg.

          While I can give them some comfort my financial means are highly limited. You know whose means aren’t as limited? Billionaires.

          • Draupnir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Thanks for the context. The comfortable lie is that billionaires are the reason there is a class divide. It’s sinister to believe this both because it is not the correct solution to the problem of inequality, and that it makes the situation feel so wildly out of the power of a person that they do not take action to improve.

            It is noble to want to provide comfort, but that is just giving a man the fish. The person first needs to decide to take action against the situation, and also know about the means they have to improve. Giving comfort can be hurtful in that it trains them to rely on the hope of a comfort in their day, rather than to rely on themselves to change their situation.

            • macniel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Billionaires are a symptom of social inequality. And just like in health you treat the symptoms first if unable to treat the root cause.

              And by moving money from billionaires to actual projects that increases infrastructure and equality for everyone e.g. putting the money to work, isn’t that a good and just cause?

              Isnt a solidary society be something we as humans should strive for?

    • TxzK@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yup, you are correct. Billionaires didn’t fell into money, they stole money. From the poor.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      surely that means you’re a billionaire who knows how to actually work, then, right? since that’s all it takes?

      • Draupnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Nope, not a billionaire. But I can see a path to it and yes, work is what it takes. But one needs to have the right understanding of work and what that means to do it and scale what work is for you.

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Ridiculous.

          In the USA you have an average annual income of 65k. From which you pay rent and living each month.

          You need to be lucky in investment to be able to retire at 65 with just s million dollars.

          You are talking about BILLIONS!

          • Draupnir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            You’re making the wrong investments then. You don’t get wealthy by gently contributing to a 401(k) and hoping for insane appreciation. Average US citizen works a full-time job, 9-5 probably right? Then what do they do with their 5-9? Are they doing things that align themselves with actions that are more likely to make them money, or are they spending earnings on distractions?

            • macniel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Then what do they do with their 5-9?

              I don’t know, how about actually living a life?

              • Draupnir@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                If by actually living a life you mean things like going out with friends, playing games/fun hobbies, spending time with family, going to dinner, etc. then that’s fine! But that’s the cost of staying where you are. And on the other side, the path to wealth costs the sacrifice of these things temporarily for a period in life. Each is the cost of the other.

                • macniel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  But I’m sorry. You are a capitalist while I am a socialist. We won’t ever see eye to eye on this matter.

                • macniel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  You know who doesn’t have to choose between a life with friends, hobbies and family?

                  Billionaires.

                  Why do you suck up to them? What do you hope to get out of this?

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Just get a better paying job is what you are saying? Or start a company, but remember that it needs to be a successful company?

      • Draupnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If someone wants to break the cycle and have a stab at a better life, then I do believe that yes, business and hard as hell work to make it happen is the cost. Most people would rather sit in comfort and point blame at some external figure for their misfortunes, yet they are in no better of a place in the end.

        A better paying job can help certainly. And it can ease the pressure of being a lesser earner if treated responsibly. But in the end, working a job is still working for someone else and taking all your time to do so. Someone could run a business in a way that they create a full-time job for themselves and still end up here.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Great! Most new businesses fail, which makes sense given the people starting them are new at this. Billionaires often have had several failed attempts. The difference is, they have room to fail and try again.

          How do we give others that chance, if not by keeping billionaires from hoovering up all the resources?

          • Draupnir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Sounds like an excuse to stop yourself from starting and continue pointing fingers at someone else. Also, sounds like you think they are somehow special and unique and have powers that you don’t. They’re a human just like you. Everybody fails at everything at some point, but the differentiating factor is whether you’re going to pick yourself up and keep going with the new information you’ve gotten. It doesn’t cost anything to hedge against risk and make a plan for potential failure, and you certainly don’t need to be a billionaire to do it.