• Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m getting pretty old so I have experienced multiple waterfall projects. The comic should be

      You want to go to mars You spend 3 months designing a rocket You spend 6 months building a rocket You spend a month testing the rocket and notice there is a critical desing flaw.

      You start over again with a new design and work on it for 2 months You spend another 6 months building it You spend 2 months testing

      Rocket works fine now, but multiple other companies already have been to Mars, so no need to even go anymore.

    • tyler
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      pretty sure they’re saying waterfall for building a rocket because that’s literally how NASA builds a rocket, including the software. It’s terrible for building anything other than a rocket though, because the stakes aren’t high for most other projects, at least not in the way that a critical mistake will be incredibly bad.

      • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i take you have never heard of the V-model. basically you climb the waterfall back up to verify everything. most things that fly within the atmosphere are done that way. pretty sure NASA would do the same.