Inhibit Sleep when running certain kinds of tasks
discuss.kde.org
(Arguably terminals should take suspend inhibitors to turn off the auto suspend when a command is executing. But they don’t.) @mcantazaro power: Add increase power consuption description for automatic suspend (!3082) · Merge requests · GNOME / Settings · GitLab We want to inhibit when running stuff like pacman, wget, cp or mv We don’t want to inhibit when running stuff like htop, less, watch Should we be looking into implementing this in konsole or is it better to implement this in the sh...

A person, on the Gnome Issue, suggested that terminals inhibit sleep when there is stuff running in them.

Continuing from that discussion, I am trying to understand, at which point it would be desirable to implement said inhibition - terminal emulator, the shell or the program itself

Additionally:

  • We want to inhibit when running stuff like pacman, wget, cp or mv
  • We don’t want to inhibit when running stuff like htop, less, watch
  • pelya@lemmy.world
    10·
    13 hours ago

    We want to inhibit when running stuff like pacman, wget, cp or mv

    There is already a separate systemd-inhibit command that does exactly what you need. Trust your users, they are capable of googling it (most of the time).

    Only pacman and wget will benefit from suspend inhibition, because it will prevent breaking network connections. cp and mv will resume working just fine even when you hibernated your laptop while cp was executing. And in that case it’s less bug-prone to scan your system for active TCP connections to external addresses instead of adding a hack wakelock inside your terminal or inside wget.

    It is also a poor idea to mess up with system-wide settings from some command when the user does not expect it, you’ll likely to get a thousand invalid bug reports that sleep mode is broken when some service randomly decides to use wget to continuously read from local Unix socket.

  • Corngood@lemmy.ml
    2·
    13 hours ago

    I use gnome-session-inhibit quite a bit, but it’s hard to imagine a good way to automate it.

    Sometimes I inhibit idle to keep something on screen, and sometimes I just inhibit suspend so something can complete.

    It probably doesn’t make sense for the terminal to have anything more than a protocol to control it. The only real benefit to that would be in remote sessions, and it’s not really clear how it should work when multiple machines are involved.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    2·
    14 hours ago

    I remember writing a script that posted an X event 1x a minute for something like that. The event was probably simulating pressing the shift key.