• lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    while allowing legitimate users and verified crawlers to browse normally.

    What is a “verified crawler” though? What I worry about is, is it only big companies like Google that are allowed to have them now?

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I dunno. I don’t find any sympathy with any of these fuckers though. this is not a generally useful technology, it is not something the average person ever needs to see, and honestly, just fuck em. Fuck anyone messing with open source to engorge the garbage dispenser.

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Any accessibility service will also see the “hidden links”, and while a blind person with a screen reader will notice if they wonder off into generated pages, it will waste their time too. Especially if they don’t know about such “feature” they’ll be very confused.

        Also, I don’t know about you, but I absolutely have a use for crawling X, Google maps, Reddit, YouTube, and getting information from there without interacting with the service myself.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          yeah. it’s pretty fucked. hopefully it’s temporary.

          so do we make everything inaccessible to everyone, or just inaccessible to disabled people? we don’t have a way to include them yet. we should work on it, but we are not the ones who fucked accessibility.

          yeah. search engine web crawlers are a public service. they are responsible. but we are in a conflict. we must struggle tooth and nail against capital for every nice thing.