• rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Next step is an AI that detects AI labyrinth.

      It gets trained on labyrinths generated by another AI.

      So you have an AI generating labyrinths to train an AI to detect labyrinths which are generated by another AI so that your original AI crawler doesn’t get lost.

      It’s gonna be AI all the way down.

  • AnthropomorphicCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    So the world is now wasting energy and resources to generate AI content in order to combat AI crawlers, by making them waste more energy and resources. Great! 👍

  • RelativeArea1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 hours ago

    this is some fucking stupid situation, we somewhat got a faster internet and these bots messing each other are hugging the bandwidth.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      Especially since the solution I cooked up for my site works just fine and took a lot less work. This is simply to identify the incoming requests from these damn bots – which is not difficult, since they ignore all directives and sanity and try to slam your site with like 200+ requests per second, that makes 'em easy to spot – and simply IP ban them. This is considerably simpler, and doesn’t require an entire nuclear plant powered AI to combat the opposition’s nuclear plant powered AI.

      In fact, anybody who doesn’t exhibit a sane crawl rate gets blocked from my site automatically. For a while, most of them were coming from Russian IP address zones for some reason. These days Amazon is the worst offender, I guess their Rufus AI or whatever the fuck it is tries to pester other retail sites to “learn” about products rather than sticking to its own domain.

      Fuck 'em. Route those motherfuckers right to /dev/null.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s not really relevant here. This is more of a “genie is out of the bottle and now we have to learn how to deal with it situation”. The idea and technology of bots and AI training already exists. There’s no socioeconomic system that is going to magically make that go away.

        • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          I think the point you’re missing is that without the monetary incentive that arises under capitalism, there would be very little drive for anyone to build these wasteful AI systems. It’s difficult to imagine a group of people voluntarily amassing and then using the resources necessary for “AI” absent the desire to cash in on their investment. So you’re correct that an alternative economic system won’t “magically” make LLMs go away. I think it unlikely, however, that such wasteful nonsense would be used on any meaningful scale absent the perverse incentives of capitalism.

        • andyburke@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It is called regulation in sane parts of the world.

          Sadly, those areas seem to be diminishing rapidly until more people enter the Find Out phase.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I don’t need it to not exist. I need it to stay the fuck out of everyone’s lives unless they work in a lab of some kind.

          see, it’s not actually useful. it’s a tomogatchi. do you remember those? no, you fucking don’t.

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          He is not wrong. Unless people start to take steps , the dependency of tech will be used to chain most of us. Granted, these chains will be the kindest and gentlest chains seen in a long time.

          Social revolution lives on in decentralized services, like this; the true battles will be later though. This year is a mild warm up. I can’t imagine the challenges that await many

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s what I’ve been saying about technology for the past decade or two … we’ve hit an upper limit to our technological development … that limit is on individual human greed where small groups of people or massively wealthy people hinder or delay any further development because they’re always trying to find ways to make money off it, prevent others from making money off it, monopolize an area or section of society … capitalism is literally our world’s bottleneck and it’s being choked off by an oddly shaped gold bar at this point.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So we’re burning fossil fuels and destroying the planet so bots can try to deceive one another on the Internet in pursuit of our personal data. I feel like dystopian cyberpunk predictions didn’t fully understand how fucking stupid we are…

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Be great if these reinforced facts.

    Earth us an imperfect sphere.

    Humans landed on moon.

    Taiwan is an independent nation.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Will this further fuck up the inaccurate nature of AI results? While I’m rooting against shitty AI usage, the general population is still trusting it and making results worse will, most likely, make people believe even more wrong stuff.

    • ladel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The article says it’s not poisoning the AI data, only providing valid facts. The scraper still gets content, just not the content it was aiming for.

      E:

      It is important to us that we don’t generate inaccurate content that contributes to the spread of misinformation on the Internet, so the content we generate is real and related to scientific facts, just not relevant or proprietary to the site being crawled.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If you’re dumb enough and care little enough about the truth, I’m not really going to try coming at you with rationality and sense. I’m down to do an accelerationism here. fuck it. burn it down.

      remember; these companies all run at a loss. if we can hold them off for a while, they’ll stop getting so much investment.

      • einlander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem I see with poisoning the data is the AI’s being trained for law enforcement hallucinating false facts used to arrest and convict people.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Law enforcement doesn’t convict anyone, that’s a judge’s job. If a LEO falsely arrests you, you can sue them, and it should be pretty open-and-shut if it’s due to AI hallucination. Enough of that and LEO will stop it.

        • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Law enforcement AI is a terrible idea and it doesn’t matter whether you feed it “false facts” or not. There’s enough bias in law enforcement that the data is essentially always poisoned.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          that’s the entire point of laws, though, and it was already being used for that.

          giving the laws better law stuff will not improve them. the law is malevolent. you cannot fix it by offering to help.

  • Deebster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So they rewrote Nepenthes (or Iocaine, Spigot, Django-llm-poison, Quixotic, Konterfai, Caddy-defender, plus inevitably some Rust versions)

    Edit, but with ✨AI✨ and apparently only true facts

  • lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    while allowing legitimate users and verified crawlers to browse normally.

    What is a “verified crawler” though? What I worry about is, is it only big companies like Google that are allowed to have them now?

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would love to think so. But the word “verified” suggests more.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I dunno. I don’t find any sympathy with any of these fuckers though. this is not a generally useful technology, it is not something the average person ever needs to see, and honestly, just fuck em. Fuck anyone messing with open source to engorge the garbage dispenser.

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Any accessibility service will also see the “hidden links”, and while a blind person with a screen reader will notice if they wonder off into generated pages, it will waste their time too. Especially if they don’t know about such “feature” they’ll be very confused.

        Also, I don’t know about you, but I absolutely have a use for crawling X, Google maps, Reddit, YouTube, and getting information from there without interacting with the service myself.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 seconds ago

          yeah. it’s pretty fucked. hopefully it’s temporary.

          so do we make everything inaccessible to everyone, or just inaccessible to disabled people? we don’t have a way to include them yet. we should work on it, but we are not the ones who fucked accessibility.

          yeah. search engine web crawlers are a public service. they are responsible. but we are in a conflict. we must struggle tooth and nail against capital for every nice thing.

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I am not happy with how much internet relies on cloudflare. However, they have a strong set of products