• BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 days ago

    Us Republicans are NOT interested in GENITALS! We just think ALL CHILDREN should have to show GROWN UNVETTED MEN their Genitals BEFORE going into EVERY SINGLE BATHROOM IN THE COUNTRY! And if they REFUSE to show ME their GENITALS we’ll SHIP them To El Salvador! And if Their PARENTS Refuse we’ll ship THEM to El Salvador TOO!

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think that there should be a rule that you can only repost this if you pay it forward and shrink his face another half of a percent.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    It’s because they’re child predators and sexual predators in general. Why else would they be asking what’s in your pants?

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m just into it for the stats. Biggest gains, smallest shrinkage in the cold, stretchiest foreskin, etc. I challenge any of these little fucks to beat my record for strongest vertical and starboard curvature. No one will ever outdo “The Corkscrew.”

  • MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    what if we all start anonymously spamming dickpics to every conservative? If they like cock so much let’s see how they like it when their inboxes are full of dicks.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        12 days ago

        A majority of the worlds population agrees with doing so. Sports is inherently discriminatory, we’ve asked for it to be that way to ensure fairness.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          12 days ago

          And it is. Most sports that allow trans women require them to be on hrt for at least 2 years, at which point any physical advantages are essentially gone. Lia Thomas, the swimmer Republicans LOVE to rage about, only placed first in the 500 meter freestyle and still timed a full 9 seconds behind Katie ledecky’s record. She placed fifth and tenth for the 200 and 100 meter freestyles, respectively. You think an unfair competition would look more… You know, unfair?

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      … it’s not personally invasive.

      What part of injecting a needle into someone’s bloodstream to syphon their blood for genetic testing against their will is not personally invasive?

      • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        The part where you don’t have to show your genitals.

        And the part where we’re drug testing anyways, for the purposes of weeding out people who are doping.

        So uh - yeah. You just tack on an additional test and exclude people with the wrong chromosomal pairs.

        • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Quick reminder that a) intersex people exist and they might not have one of your favourite chromosome combinations, b) just because something potentially (likely) worse is threatened doesn’t mean that the other action is good, and c) why do you need to know whether or not somebody might have different genes from what you might expect?

          • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            A: One of my favorite people are intersex; they exist - but insofar as Intersex/Interested in Sports/Can Compete at a high level of sport is such a teeeeeeeny tiny portion of the population, maintaining solid definitions of men and women’s sports is for the sake of the sport, not for the sake of the individual. If I’m born without legs, I’m not screaming at the world that I’m being discriminated against for not being allowed to compete in the 500 meter dash.

            B: What?

            C: Because that’s what sport is. We’ve decided as a human populace, across the world, across all borders, across all of society – That the top male athletes are generally, in most circumstances, better than women. In order to allow women to compete, we’ve separated out those games for their protection. It’s a pretty cut and dry deal. It’s the one thing on this earth that transcends borders, religions, institutions, etc. Humanity has agreed that this is the way to go. There are not enough intersex or transgender people to split off their own category - so we can’t do that, so we simply deny men access to women’s sports.

            The opposite isn’t true however - “Men’s” sports is more like “Open” sports. Anyone can compete in men’s sports without it being an issue; because there’s no chance of unsportsmanlike advantage being there.

            People who think this is arguable or something that needs to be changed are sick in the head. They would punish the 99.9% for the 0.1%

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              You’re describing gender roles.

              Feminist scholars have been theorizing about this stuff for a long time. Patriarchy demands and requires rigid gender roles.

              • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                You are absolutely off your rocker if that is what you think this is. Patriarchy has to deal with the “Ruling” class, not competition. Competition is like science. You control for variables to test things. In this case, the absolute limit of the human body.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago
                  1. You don’t need to talk to me like that.

                  2. Sports were invented, they didn’t just emerge naturally from evolution. That means the ruling class played a key role in their creation and propagation i.e. the patriarchs decided sports should be based around the men that watch and play them. They decide what sports get funding, state backing, and media attention.

                  We could have different sports, where biological differences don’t have as much importance. In fact, sports don’t even need to be competitive at all! But, those sports don’t get the support they need to become popular so they remain niche hobbies.

            • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              I’m glad you are aware of intersex people, it does seem a bit mean to exclude them but I’m not a sports expert.

              Regarding my point B: If somebody threatens to do something bad (check genitals) to check for a condition X and then somebody else suggests doing something else (take their blood for a blood test) to check for a condition X.

              This does not make the second suggestion a good thing, it is merely a lesser evil. One should first check if the condition X needs to be known. In the case of bathrooms I’d argue that no it does not. In the case sports generally they would need to disclose it but I would like to note that it probably doesn’t need to be publically known.

              I just thought you might like to hear that the International Olympic Committee officially allowed trans athletes since 2004, while the International Association of Athletics Federations first allowed trans people who transitioned early enough. Nowadays both of their policies appear to be mildly more inclusive than they were originally.

              At least according to the following sources after one or two years on hormone therapy when accounting for the weight difference (which I believe most sports already do and did previously as well by setting weight classes) there is no performance difference between transgender athletes and cisgender athletes. (One exception being that trans men completed more sit ups in one minute)

              Sources: Effect of gender affirming hormones on athletic performance in transwomen and transmen: implications for sporting organisations and legislators

              Effects of gender affirming hormone therapy on exercise performance in transgender athletes

              Correction:Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study

              I haven’t looked specifically for it but I did not find a source claiming otherwise when trying to research trans athletes on hrt.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      If you can’t tell when people are trans without stripping them or testing their blood do you think maybe perhaps it doesn’t matter??? You’re just a creep, stop pretending you want things like this for any positive reason.