Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    Ā·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    From linkedin, not normally known as a source of anti-ai takes so that’s a nice change. I found it via bluesky so I can’t say anything about its provenance:

    We keep hearing that AI will soon replace software engineers, but we’re forgetting that it can already replace existing jobs… and one in particular.

    The average Founder CEO.

    Before you walk away in disbelief, look at what LLMs are already capable of doing today:

    • They use eloquence as a surrogate for knowledge, and most people, including seasoned investors, fall for it.
    • They regurgitate material they read somewhere online without really understanding its meaning.
    • They fabricate numbers that have no ground in reality, but sound aligned with the overall narrative they’re trying to sell you.
    • They are heavily influenced by the last conversations they had.
    • They contradict themselves, pretending they aren’t.
    • They politely apologize for their mistakes, but don’t take any real steps to fix the underlying problem that caused them in the first place.
    • They tend to forget what they told you last week, or even one hour ago, and do it in a way that makes you doubt your own recall of events.
    • They are victims of the Dunning–Kruger effect, and they believe they know a lot more about the job of people interacting with them than they actually do.
    • They can make pretty slides in high volumes.
    • They’re very good at consuming resources, but not as good at turning a profit.
    • @rook @BlueMonday1984 I don’t believe LLMs will replace programmers. When I code, I dive into it, and I fall into this beautiful world of abstract ideas that I can turn into something cool. LLMs can’t do that. They lack imagination and passion. Thats part of why lisp is turning into my favorite language. LLMs can’t do lisp very well because everyone has a unique system image with macros they’ve written. Lisp let’s you make DSLs Soo easily as though everyone has their own dialect.