• Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Slap an air tag on their collar if you’re that concerned. I’d rather have less surveillance.

    • myserverisdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I would too. The argument wasn’t that it’s a net good. The argument is that if it were to work as they claim and only identify animals matching the description of lost pets using a mesh network, then that helps pets and pet owners. That’s objectively true.

      And air tags rely on Bluetooth signaling. Lost pets often avoid people so they don’t work very well in most cases. The only options that do work are subscription based(gross) GPS trackers that use cell towers and GPS signals to determine their location. Which we have now, but thanks.

      • Rooster326
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You have a subscription based collar tracker for your dog?

        • myserverisdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s the only way to do it properly. There’s no other way to get the GPS location without using cell towers to transmit and cell phone companies refuse to offer that service for free.

      • tyler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Air tags use UWB radio, not Bluetooth.