Normalize replying to the stalebot likewise

  • Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They shouldn’t even be using the probot, it’s deprecated, unmaintained and thus potentially vulnerable

    • Deebster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also just the whole concept is wrong and encourages “me too” spam just to keep the thing from timing out and not being fixed.

      • Aatube@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I actually see a legitimate use case for it and helped add the actions version in a project where I’m a collaborator.

        Quite a bit, certain bugs disappear after an update without us targeting it (partially because the logs get fudged a bit after going through dependencies, so sometimes multiple bugs have the same cause or it’s actually a dependency issue that got fixed) and sometimes we forget about old feature requests.

        The stale reminder doubles as a reminder for us to (re)consider working on the issue. When we know something probably isn’t gonna get fixed suddenly, we apply a label to the issue. For enhancements that we’ll definitely work on soon™, we apply help wanted. We’ve configured the action to ignore both. We also patrol notifications from stale to see if something shouldn’t go stale. This is a medium-sized project so we can handle patrolling and IMO this helps us quite a bit.

        • Deebster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fair enough; I didn’t consider artifacts like logs and traces. I suppose a stale marker might prompt the original reporter to retest and supply fresh ones (or confirm it’s fixed in the dependency case).

          In an ideal world I suppose we’d have automated tests for all bug reports but that’s obviously never going to happen!