Fuck it, .zshrc it is.

Image transcription:

  • Top text: I STILL DON’T KNOW WHAT SHOULD GO IN .*RC VERSUS .*PROFILE
  • Bottom text: AND AT THIS POINT I’M AFRAID TO ASK
  • CodeBlooded
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Alright stranger, let’s hear it. What is it about Fish that you love so much?

    I’ve been generally happy with bash or zsh, pretty much whatever is installed by default (and I honestly don’t know the difference between the two I just mentioned 😬).

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Zsh has more features and customization options than bash. Fish has a ton of convenience features at the cost of POSIX compatibility (which many view as a good thing)

    • tyler
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Once upon a time I was the person that was constantly messing with my shell. I would performance tune it, try out new plugins weekly, change my config often. It honestly became a huge waste of time. Since switching to fish I literally haven’t spent any time configuring it at all, besides adding in the fzf plugin and the fzf-marks plugin. It just works. And it has all of the same features that everyone adds to zsh with plugins straight out of the box.

      If you’re happy with the default in bash or zsh then you will be even more happy with the default in fish, as it’s just much much more user friendly (which is why so many people add so many plugins to bash and zsh: to make it more user friendly). You can even configure it (even the colors) with a web interface! No mucking about in text files if you don’t want to.