• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1302 months ago

    A thousand years from now it will be an uncompleted and abandoned project that looks like Stonehenge. People will theorize about why it was built and what it was for.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    592 months ago

    This is being built in the town of Wemding which celebrated its 1,200 year anniversary in 1993. The idea was to build something that would take 1,200 years to complete in order to emphasize how long the town has been in existence. People saying its stupid or going to be abandoned are forgetting the town itself has existed for longer.

    • Johanno
      link
      fedilink
      162 months ago

      While the town is that old I promise you that almost nothing looks like it was 1200 years ago. Maybe they can hold on that tradition 100 years but at some point the people won’t bother. Need more space or don’t see the point of it anymore

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How about that concrete doesn’t last that long?

      Regardless, it just a pr piece for the town, so whatever.

      *well not the concrete they’re likely using, anyhow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Roman concrete is very different from modern concrete. It was made with a few different ingredients that made salt water strengthen it, as opposed to weaken it, and lime class (among other things) helped it “self heal” cracks.

          Roman concrete is why I put the * comment, but no one uses it anymore. Between it being a lost recipe for a while and it taking longer to “set” no one throwing up buildings or laying out roads cares that something lasts over 100 years anymore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Doubt they will use the same concrete recipe used in highways.

            They most likely already thought about and solved that particular problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            Cymraeg
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We know the recipe for Roman concrete, and we have better concrete recipes. This absolutely can last longer than Roman concrete.

            It’s self healing because of the poorer mixing, undissolved quicklime (calcium oxide) would remain in the concrete, and water getting in cracks would dissolve it and produce calcium hydroxide, which then combines with carbon dioxide to form more limestone aggregate (calcium carbonate) to heal the cracks.

            There’s a survivor bias when it comes to really old buildings of course so it’s likely we’re only seeing a small portion of the surviving buildings from that era.

            We could make concrete that lasts multiple times the amount of time as Roman concrete, but we usually don’t because it’s more expensive (and modern construction seems to be about minimizing costs as much as possible and not worrying about anything more than a few decades out)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      That’s a nice thought but will the town actually still exist if the population doesn’t? Humans have maybe 120 years left, there’s zero chance of humans finishing this pyramid.

      Although if a weird little art installation in a small German town is what gets capitalism to end, I’m all for it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    542 months ago

    Matt Parker has a video explaining how this art installation didn’t actually do the math right, and the pyramid is one cube off.

    In 1200 years it will end with missing one piece lmao

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 months ago

      Yup, “off by 1” mistake. How does nobody noticed that during the planning phase? And it’s the German no less, aren’t they supposed to be super good at these kind of things?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    252 months ago

    What an uninspiring and uninteresting final product that effort will produce. Not worth the wait.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 months ago

        If this project is an example of long sighted achievement then it’s not going to motivate people to embrace long term efforts.

      • DaGeek247
        link
        fedilink
        132 months ago

        Not that, it’s just ugly. The wait part is neat, but the final design is just, not fun to look at.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think it’s already interesting. You can already see the difference in age on the existing blocks, and the difference will only grow with each decade of the project. I think the contrast between the first and final blocks would make a striking sight and poignant point about how something we might consider permanent within a single lifetime, concrete, really really isn’t.

      The project also doesn’t require that every block be concrete. The material can be whatever, and as such, future blocks, and then past blocks, may come to represent the major construction methods of their times.

      As an art-installation that makes me contemplate the past, the future, and the passing of time, I’d consider it successful starting on the day the first block was put down.

      Whether it becomes complete one day, or is abandoned somewhere along the way, the piece has, and will have, a lot to say about the relationship that humans have with time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -12 months ago

        I think you’re glamourising it beyond its merit. As the planet turns into a smoking ball of shit over next 75 years. People will have less opportunity and desire to stare at a pile of concrete blocks while stroking their dick in wonder. Humans are too quick to label things “poignant” in our quest to bring meaning into an increasingly meaningless world. We’ve reached a point where the quest for poignancy now results in literal sculptures made of feces being discussed as critical statements of the human condition. With the money being spend on the pyramid, what practical good could we do today?

        • MentalEdge
          link
          fedilink
          72 months ago

          You’re right.

          Contemplation is meritless. The art installations and greenery in our towns and cities are doing nothing more than fellating the egos of “creatives”. Introspection is dead, and living life for anything other than brutal utility is an insult to efficient civilization. And since we can’t live as if we’re machines, we should all just kill ourselves.

          /S

          Art is important. It’s one the things people actually want to do, you know, for fun. One of the things that makes a meaningless existence worth enduring.

          That you get off spitting on the concept as if it’s nothing more than a masturbatory vice is unimaginably tragic.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -42 months ago

            You’re back to calling this pyramid thing art again. Which is where you run afoul of your own circular logic. I think you should step back and look closely at what you wrote. See if it make sense to you after a close scrutinization.

            • MentalEdge
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              What?

              My own circular logic? Are you suggesting I somehow discredited my own view?

              Or do you not know what /s means?

              It is an art installation, literally, and I think it’s a pretty cool one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      Agreed. Given a budget of a few million I could hire a team to build something twice as impressive in a month or two.

    • whoareu
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Could you please provide transcript of the video in case people don’t want to visit YouTube?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Basically what they did was the following. Each concrete block represents 10 years. They get placed when another decade ends/starts(not to sure). So the problem is the following: when the 1200 years are over they have only placed 119 blocks so the building will be finished in 1210 years. Its the same as with a fence. If you have e.g. 10 Elements of a fence you need 11 posts. The ones who designed this building however didnt count the fence posts(the concrete blocks which mark the end of a decade) and I stead counted the “fence elements” causing the whole thing to be off by 10 years.

        • Match!!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          shit man if they’re only 10 years late on a public works project they’ll still be average

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    while that seems like a long time for Germany to build The Pyramids it’s actually only 12 turns and the free granary in every city will really help in the early game

  • Rhaedas
    link
    fedilink
    152 months ago

    I think the issue is the time span between blocks. Had they done a 1200 block, once a year thing, it would “feel” like progress and something to participate in regularly, even if you will never see the majority of it. Geometrically with the same design to get 1200 blocks I came up with a base of 19 blocks, then every odd number, skipping 11 and 3.