• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Christianity/Catholicism? Don’t you mean just Roman Catholicism? As you can have Christianity without the Roman Catholicism. When I was researching faith and religion, I was able to rule out Roman Catholicism. I know what you mean about self contradictory BS (things such as purgatory being unbiblical, perpetual virginity of mary despite Matthew’s gospel strongly implying that she consummated her marriage and the Bible mentioning Jesus’ brothers several times, etc). As with preaching and action - I care more about the faith and my own spirituality than letting myself be defined by what others are doing. Of course, I’ll always call people out when they are being heretical and/or abusive or misusing the faith (I remember there was an Indian guy who claimed to have converted to Christianity but I later realised he did it because he hated Muslims so much, and he ended up actually dropping his identity as a “Christian” because I kept telling him that Christians cannot call for a mass extermination of a religious group. Pretty funny but also a sad story), but I wouldn’t stop being a Christian just because other Christians are being hypocrites. Why should I let them take what Jesus did for me away from me?

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Christianity/Catholicism? Don’t you mean just Roman Catholicism?

      No, christianity as a whole. The sourcebook is a self contradictory slapfight perpetuated by whomever translated the particular copy you’re looking at, and is a convenient shield for those who choose not to follow the faith, but want a way to hurt/control others while pretending they do.

      There are a lot of good lessons to take out of the sourcebook, but there’s more chaff than wheat to be had, and I just have no time for it anymore.

      Why should I let them take what Jesus did for me away from me?

      No one is saying you should let them take that from you. But you don’t have to be a christian to be a good person and to use the positives you gained from your experience. I took the good parts of the religion and moved on with my life. I’m still a good person and have the beliefs my christian family instilled in me, I just don’t care to surround myself with religious types for reasons that most religious people feel offended by.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Bible doesn’t contain any contradictions. Also, nobody can be a good person, not even Christians.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yes that’s what they are saying unless you bow down and bend a knee specifically to Jesus which is odd cause he’s not even good but the son of God but that also makes him God but also all the parts written about him that everyone quotes were written by a business man who never met Jesus but pretended to after being thrown out of the town and realizing he would die in the desert.

            But specifically name Jesus as your ride or die or fucking die. Because, you aren’t part of the gang enough to not question things and that kind of questioning weakens the faith every time.

            The faith in Christianity in a nutshell.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Once again, someone thinks if they don’t believe in something, it won’t be true. I’m not a Christian because I simply like what it teaches- I’m a Christian because it’s true.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tell me you haven’t actually read the bible without telling me you’ve never actually read the bible.

          Also, that’s a bullshit copout by bad people who have no intention of improving themselves.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why should I let them take what Jesus did for me away from me?

      Why did God have to send his son to die for you? Why can’t he just decide not to punish people without requiring a blood offering?

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because then there’s no justice for sin. God is perfectly just, and forgiving people for no reason isn’t justice

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          But God is the one doing the justice, right? Why does he have to have a blood offering? Sending his son to die when he could merely decide to forgive without a blood offering feels weird. The one who would punish us if it didn’t happen would be god himself. He could simply choose not to carry out that punishment rather than going through the act of having his son literally die an excruciating death.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            If he forgave everyone for no reason, then there’s no justice and sin goes unpunished.

            If someone damages your car and you forgave them for it, would that mean there’s no payment? No, you’d pay for it yourself. So God paid for the price of our sin Himself.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              If someone damages my car and I want to forgive them I don’t have to spill blood to do it. I could simply choose to not call the cops or whatever.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’d still have to pay for the damage though, which is the cost of your car being damaged. Meanwhile, the cost of our sin is death.

                • JackbyDev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I don’t see how you can believe God is omnipotent while also being utterly incapable of choosing to not punish people without killing his son. All the metaphors you make break down because it’s all god in control. God chose what is and is not a sin. God is the one punishing for breaking those rules. But suddenly God is incapable of choosing to not punish people without literally murdering his son? And God sends people to hell for the “sin” of not “accepting” this “forgiveness” when he could’ve just chosen not to punish us? God subjects people to an infinite amount of suffering for a finite amount of wrongdoing? Possibly even the only wrongdoing of not accepting him if you otherwise followed everything? Even if they literally never even heard of God?

                  If God is real then he’s psychopathic.

                  • Flax@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    God paid the price Himself. How’s this psychopathic? How could a perfect being exist in a perfect realm with people running about committing atrocities?