• @parpol
    link
    751 month ago

    deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 month ago

    The article doesn’t mention how it compensates for different keyboards. Like wouldn’t different switches and wear change the sound?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Great, now hackers and spies can detect my typing instead of using RATs or Trojans or packet sniffers, or just beating me with a $5 wrench (XKCD)

    Also:

    The trick, which takes advantage of the subtle acoustics created by tapping different keys on a computer, works even without a view of the computer’s keyboard, so long as the hacker has a line-of-sight view of any relatively reflective portion of the target laptop.

    So… Closing the curtains is all it takes to defeat this amazing technological method. GG.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m not sure why you’re so dismissive of this? It’s kind of asinine.

      Does everyone everywhere only ever use computers in an enclosed room? Is everyone with something value to exfiltrate easily accessible to kidnap and beat with a wrench?

      This is valuable for corporate espionage, political purposes, or for nation states. If miniaturized, even easier for targeted attacks where it might be difficult to inject malware, or for broad attacks on office workers.

      And the best part is that it doesn’t leave a trace which beating someone with a wrench and malware would do…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        You’re not James Bond. Or a 1337 haxx0r. This technology isn’t even new. Why are you stanning this guy? It’s an assinine position to take.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      321 month ago

      demonstrating that he can point a laser that’s invisible to the human eye at a faraway laptop, through a window, and detect the computer’s vibrations to reconstruct virtually every character typed on it

      Infrared is not visible

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Ahh ok, that’s what you meant before I guess

          Since that function is usually meant for night vision, I wonder how well a security camera can pick out the laser during the day i.e. when the IR sensors are being swamped by daylight also coming in through the window

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          actually thats UV. transition lenses won’t change with a glass window thats not open. infrared is basically heat and does indeed pass through. Cars in the sun would not get hot so fast if they did not let in infrared.

          • Sneezycat
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            I have an IR camera and windows look like mirrors. Might depend on the type of glass idk.

            • HubertManne
              link
              fedilink
              71 month ago

              if this yahoo from the internet I found in a search is right then its both:

              “Glass will bock low frequency IR (red hot), but allow the passage of high frequency (white hot) IR. Hence, the heat of the sun will easily pass into a greenhouse, but once this energy is converted into low frequency heat by the objects within that absorb it, then the resulting low frequency heat is trapped. Hence, the Greenhouse Effect.”

              • Sneezycat
                link
                fedilink
                31 month ago

                That makes a lot of sense, thanks for doing the homework!

          • Hello_there
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Some UV is blocked by glass. Either UVA or UVB. It doesn’t block both.

            • HubertManne
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              yeah I encountered it when looking at infrared for another convo in the thread. its uvb for what we think of as glass. the clear stuff. which is what causes sunburns and the transition lenses to activate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I’m not going to argue with you but you should read the article perhaps? It’s pretty specific about where the laser is aimed vis a vis windows and whatnot

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      171 month ago

      It’s already infrared. Also, UV is partially visible to humans in some scenarios.

    • @jwt
      link
      101 month ago

      Ah, another pterodactyl aficionado!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -71 month ago

    Oddly enough - all my keystrokes sound exactly the same which makes this person’s claim so much bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -81 month ago

    So how do we fix this? Dumb nerds never think about the consequences of their creations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 month ago

      From the article: “Even knowing that Kamkar’s silent, invisible, long-distance laser spy trick exists, how does anyone hide their secrets from it? He suggests that companies install double-paned or reflective glass. Some security device companies also sell protection devices that affix to windows and vibrate them to prevent laser microphone spying, and Kamkar concedes he hasn’t tested his attack against those. But he also suggests a safer countermeasure: “Don’t work on computers visible from a window,” he says. “Or just have dirty windows.””

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Companies can’t even be convinced to have longer passwords on their wifi. And open office plans mean every computer faces a window

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            But I work at companies and I would like my info to not be hacked. Their fuck ups affect employees and customers

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The problem is the companies aren’t suffering the majority of the consequences of the security breaches, it’s the people these companies have personal information on & that includes people who have never done business with these companies but that these companies purchased data on.

    • @parpol
      link
      101 month ago

      deleted by creator