• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Deadpool & Wolverine today because it just came out and people would not be ready for a reboot this early.

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wanna see a modern Zombie movie with how people would actually react to news of a zombie outbreak given how people behaved during the pandemic

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      • Half the population claims it’s all a hoax and lets zombies bite them because anything else is a violation of their freedoms

      • Large swaths of gun owners take to the streets, and half of them die quickly because they put more money into the number of guns they had or making them tacticool instead of putting rounds through them or sighting them in.

      • It gets overly politicized.

      • The literal collapse of civilization, yet some corners of the government and billionaires are still trying to milk out the last drop of money

      • Breadhax0r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t look up was basically this but a meteor instead of zombies. It was honestly kind of a depressing movie lol

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually think it would be good uniting force for a divided country:

        • The “it’s a hoax” portion of the population will simply become zombies
        • The “we love guns” portion of the population can now take their life frustrations out on the zombies
        • The “we need to fix this world” portion of the population will learn to fight too and provide vital aid and supplies to the (likely growing) “we love guns” group
        • The “we need run away from this madness” portion of the population will just hunker down and play on their smartphones

        Either way, everyone kind of wins

        • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think you’re a little off on the “we need to fix this world” guys.

          Although zombie films / TV series lean heavily into the action side of things, that’s just because it’s more entertaining than watching people building things, developing tech, doing scientific research.

          Remember with COVID 19? Huge numbers of people immediately set out to find a cure, inventing and deploying ways to prevent and monitor the spread, creating pop-in treatment centres, etc.

      • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        The game series Dead Rising does the last bullet point with Zombrex, the 24 hour zombie prevention drug, which they need zombie outbreaks to make the drug so the pharmaceutical company starts causing them.

      • kd45@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You forgot the activists protesting for zombie’s rights to eat our brains

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 month ago

      Zombies ain’t rea…OH GOD ITS EATING MY FACE…still don’t believe it, he’s just on drugs.

    • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      28 Days Later had a dinnertable conversation that was exsctly like how people were talking during covid.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        Isn’t that the “… but then it wasn’t in news reports anymore; it was in our back yards, and coming in the windows…” monologue? Excellent scene.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      Avenue 5 has a pretty funny scene where a series of skeptical conspiracy theorist types are ignoring a very specific warning, claiming that the people they see dying before their very eyes are an illusion some kind of special effects and each follows to their own death.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Feed, by Mira Grant, is fun because it takes place years after a zombie uprising, but in a world where George Romero movies existed, so everyone knew what to do. It was a catastrophe, but not an apocalypse.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      In this version, all the zombies are in line for toilet paper outside the grocery store.

      In the sequel, you combine it with The Mummy, where they use the mummy for toilet paper.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The movie follows a minimum wage delivery driver in his armored car plowing through hordes of zombies to deliver pizza to the safe houses where people are hiding out.

      Edit: When he delivers the pizza, the survivors complain it is cold and don’t tip. He backs his truck through their security fence, letting the zombies in and drives off to the next delivery.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      “No, I am not going with you to a concert in the park! There’s a zombie horde out there! We’ll get bitten!”

      “Hey, even the WHO says it’s not an apocalypse anymore. The zombies are endemic now. You can’t live your life in fear.”

      “Your mom was eaten by zombies literally last week.”

      “Yeah but she had diabetes. There’s always gonna be people with preexisting conditions who are gonna be more vulnerable.”

      “At least wear your denim jacket to make it harder for them to bite you!”

      “There was a study in the Lancet that said heavy clothes don’t work.”

      “You know full well that what they found was that requiring heavy clothes didn’t work because people just got bitten at the times when they weren’t wearing them.”

      “The author himself said jackets don’t work.”

      “He said that after he was bitten and just before demanding our brains!”

      “Okay, sheeple. Oh, hey Mom. We’re just heading out to the concert.”

      “Wait, your mom is here? I thought she was…”

      “BRAAAAIINSSS…”

      “You LET HER BACK IN after she died and came back as a zombie!?”

      “Dude, she’s not infectious anymore. She caught it like four days ago.”

      “That is NOT how this works! What… DON’T HUG HER!”

      “Bye Mom, love you…ow!”

      “She just bit you, didn’t she.”

      “Nah, I’m fine. Let’s go to the concert.”

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s a series called The Bite, it was filmed during earlier quarantine times of the ongoing pandemic and features a bunch of cast from The Good Fight. Is good.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Zombie deniers being eaten as they continue to insist it’s a liberal hoax.

      Unrelated but I was thinking if it was a zombie outbreak. And I’m stuck in a retirement home. Am I safe? They can’t bite me, they don’t have teeth

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any movie where 1 cell phone would resolve the situation. A lot of serial camper killers would get shut down pretty fast.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just put the camp outside of cell service. Plenty of camping in the mountains outside of cell service.

      Still fully believable

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are also a swath of movies that couldn’t be made because of the ubiquity of surveillance cameras.

      Who did it!?! ~Checks camera~

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Heh in the new Mission Impossible, it’s

          Tap for spoiler

          a scary computer program interfering with the audio/video feeds so you couldn’t rely on them. Pretty well done overall, not bad at least.

    • proper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Commando. Arnold spends a good chunk of the movie stopping people from getting to a pay phone to let the bad guy know he escaped their custody

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not just cellphones but every house now is equipped with a camera on the doorbell and possibly several more throughout the house. Back in the day serial killers basically just had to not be around when the police showed up and had a pretty good chance of just getting away

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Introduce a character that’s a teacher so sick of cellphones in their class they bought a jammer off the internet. Make that character the serial killer’s first victim.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Back to the Future II today because a positive outlook on the future is no longer believable even for a family film.

    • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You couldnt make back to the future today because their future is already in our past, their future (2015) is already 9 years ago now

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I can’t tell if the thread has some sort of running gag or if you’re actually confused by the concept.

        You don’t have to make the future 2015. You don’t have to make the past 1955. You’re making the film, today, not when it was actually made, thats the entire point of the prompt.

        • III@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I feel like the future being 2015 is extremely in line with the gag.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I feel like the future being 2055 is extremely in line with the gag. Because we make the movie in 2025. And the plot is going 30 years into the future.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      You just have to switch the first and second future, the default future is the Biff timeline, then you have to change the future to make the hoverboard timeline.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        That would actually be so cool but I can already see the scathing online criticisms:

        “New WOKE BTTF2 ruins a family movie with vulgar dystopian future, not an ounce of original thinking in the writer’s room. Entire second act of film missing as plot is resolved in only 1 trip.”

        Might be better to just stick to original stories and concepts, tbh.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today because Westerns aren’t nearly as popular as they once were, and so it’ll be harder for jokes to land

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mel Brooks did an animated movie called the Legend of Hank that was more or less a kid friendly remake of Blazing Saddled to prove he could make it today.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        …how kid friendly? Haven’t been able to introduce my kids to his stuff yet!

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          It’s definitely nowhere near a PG-13

          It’s basically just Blazing Saddles, only it’s about a village of cats in an Eastern Setting who are protected by a Samurai, guy wants an excuse to destroy the town, realizes that if the town kills an official Samurai he can destroy the town… So he pulls a sneaky and hires a naive dog with a desire to become a samurai to be one in a world where cats are racist against dogs.

          It backfires when the dog is good at his job enough to dissuade the bigots

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Period Westerns aren’t much popular. However:

      • Wind River
      • Hell or High Water (<- do NOT sleep on this one!)
      • No Country for Old Men
      • Sicario

      …and so on.

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ah, because of the pro eugenics position in the movie? I dunno, I feel like they’d like for there to be more “past good, present degeneracy” type narratives around.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Ah, because of the pro eugenics position in the movie?

        uh? I always understood the justification of getting to Idiocracy was that only dumb people kept on having kids, the issue was not that they were genetically deficient, but that they couldn’t care less about education, ethics, societal improvement, etc

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          Whether it’s genetic or memetic the implication is that it’s what they’re passing down to their kids that’s the problem.

      • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Really could pick any ‘news’ outlet. I just feel like they’re the ones most likely to be overly dramatic and most likely to sue.

    • BurnedDonut@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      Out of all the answers where it looks like people decided to try to make fun of old movies this one is the original answer that we are living this reality.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        So remake it with a plot-twist: the man in the stasis pod just wakes up the next day but thinks he’s in the distant future. To set this up, maybe the pod is delivered to a different city or is mistakenly sent to a cable network studio.

  • eponymous_anonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 month ago

    They couldn’t make Mrs Doubtfire in this day & age - no one would believe Pierce Brosnan and Sally Field make enough money to afford a live-in nanny.

    Also, they couldn’t make Mrs. Doubtfire 2. Full stop. There will never be a sequel to that magnificent gem.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today, most of the cast is dead.

  • Mokopa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You wouldn’t make “Back To The Future” now because it wouldn’t be the future…

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Titanic today because it wouldn’t be believable… Leonardo Decaprio dating a woman his own age? Preposterous!

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Most films that require some degree of miscommunication couldn’t work because cellphones are ubiquitous.

    Additionally a lot of old sci-fi films based on a hypothesis that later turned out to be pseudoscience are here as well.

    • Amanduh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      Modern media just handwaves this easily with phones being broken or low battery whatever. It still works

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even makes it a tiny bit funnier (if it’s a comedic miscommunication, not if it’s “someone gets killed” miscommunication)

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            29 days ago

            I have no issue with movies killing off characters, I just meant that miscommunication can be funny, but usually not if it’s tragic. But then again, deaths can be comedic if we’re talking Final Destination or Tucker and Dale vs Evil. So it’s all in the context

      • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s going to get harder and harder to do that as cellphones get better though.

        iPhones already have satellite SOS feature which works worldwide, and are starting to roll out satellite texting for non-emergency use. There are a few Android models that are slated to do the same, and it’s only a matter of time before most phones can do this.

        There are plenty of phones that are waterproof (or rated for submersion in 5 meters of water for 30 minutes or whatever) and that’s only going to become more common too.

        My phone lasts for about 2 days on a charge with how much I use it, and I charge it every night. That’s only going to get better with better battery technologies (the trend of phones getting thinner in response to increased battery capacity has actually somewhat reversed in recent years).

        So, in a classic horror movie scenario with 5 or so people they’d need a reason why every single person is out of charge or has their phone broken. Even if the protagonists can’t get themselves out of the situation they’re in using their phones (because they’re broken or whatever) you still need to answer how they got into that situation in the first place if they have offline maps and GPS navigation. That’s not as big of a problem but it eliminates “they got lost” as a premise for why they’re in some spooky woods or wherever.

        It seems to me that you’d either need to set the story in an abandoned mine or make the antagonist explicitly supernatural.

        • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Or find a reason for everyone to not have their phone available in the first place. Like if you pull a From Dusk Til Dawn and have them be fugitives, you could have them ditch their phones to not be tracked and the whole group is sharing one shitty burner phone or something.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Even in movies before mobile phones, more often. Than not, they could resolve any problem by just telling the other people something, but they don’t because the movie would be over.

      Also, ever since covid, a lot of movies became way more believable. Man if only the people knew that a pandemic was coming. If only we knew how dangerous it was, if people in other countries could’ve been warned from other countries where it’s already ravaging

    • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Didn’t stop any of the wacky bs in iRobot from happening. Cellphones do cure a lot of what ails older pics, but they can be waved away by things like ‘oopsies! Forgot to charge it.’ or ‘the club is so loud I didn’t hear the ringer.’ and my personal favorite ‘forgot to take it off dnd’.

    • BurnedDonut@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      It seems you’re oblivious about drunks and addicts whom always talk shit on any kind of communication doesn’t matter the medium.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    You couldn’t make Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone now because you’re not Warner Brothers and don’t own the copyright.

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Daybreakers.

    First, it’s a mid-budget movie, and Hollywood doesn’t make much of those nowadays.

    Secondly, it commits to a wild premise: vampires become the dominant life form in the world. It’s fun, but the actors play it straight. If the tried to do that now, it’d be full of quips and winking at the audience rather than committing to the bit.

    • SlothMama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love this movie so much. Thoughtful and entertaining. Also good critique on society, capitalism, and the consequences of things like overfishing.

      • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        I just found it by chance a couple years ago, and its entered regular Halloween rotation. It’s also a very silly movie at times, but it has something to say. If it weren’t played straight, it would undercut the whole thing.

        I can’t help but imagine that, if they tried to make it today, it’d just be noted to death by the studio. “Say less, quip more.” Then you’d get a ho-hum vampire action-comedy with a whiff that it was something better in a previous draft… like Renfield.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      “Have you tried a shwarma? Let’s get a shwarma you dinklemuffin.”

      *rapturous applause, 5 star reviews*

      • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        I do think the problem is rooted in Joss Whedon, or rather, movie studios looking at Avengers and thinking, “This, all the time.” People got tired of Joss Whedon himself (among other problems with him), much less more corporate, soulless imitations.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Joss Whedon’s jokes were fine, because they were a fresh and funny take on an otherwise overly-serious and humdrum Superhero genre. His writing was game changing.

          The issue was that it was overused so much by every subsequent film after Guardians of the Galaxy that it became an eye-rolling trope of Marvel films.