• ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unfortunately, we have bears around my parts. And bears like the fruit too, driving human bear conflict. Which means the bears are killed. 🐻 :(

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    “‘When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the foreigner. I am the Lord your God.” - Leviticus 19:9, 10

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Leviticus Its in the pick and choose portion of the king james opinion of the bible.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, you don’t use the 5e handbook as your character sheet, just like you don’t use the Bible as your moral code.

        You get to not play as a charitable and kind Christian if you don’t want to, you can just as well play a greedy and mean subclass.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well it is “the Rules of the Tribe of Levi” canonically speaking they are laws made not by God but by a bunch of priests. It is important for biblical historical context reasons but technically speaking these are ancient society laws. It’s why instructional portions detailing animal sacrifice are included in that section when modern Christians tend to look at animal sacrifice as a satanic cult kind of thing.

        Provided you are Christian ( before the atheists start in, I’m not - I just study the religion as a part of gaining historical background info) Using Leviticus to justify one’s opinions on anything strikes me as showing that one read the text absent the scholarly context. A lot of Christians do this because book annotations wouldn’t be a thing before 1000 AD and it really benefited a lot of powerful people to never mention context of the compiling process of the book because once the supposed less than divine fingerprints on the processed material are brought to light it weakens it’s power as a tool of authority.

        • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          canonically speaking they are laws made not by God

          but the passage ends with God signing off on the law

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think something like this would be carried over into the new covenant as the spirit of the law remained

        • MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Except they don’t do that. What they do is pick and choose from the old testament and ignore any part of the new testament that is inconvenient. Not all of them. Just the majority of them. What they do instead is take away the benches least someone in need to sleep there. They punish those that feed the needy in many places. They pass laws to make the most vulnerable of us criminals for daring to exist in their presence.

          I don’t listen to what people say. I watch what they do. What the majority of christians in my area do is hateful and very non christian. All of them are convinced though that god always wants exactly what they want.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I believe it happened I’ve had many insane conversations with people like this.

      Like food banks and people will say well what if people that don’t need it go there. I’m like so what, if 1 in a 1000 abuses a system it doesn’t mean we should make the 999 suffer by removing it.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    My parents are happy when people pick fruits from the trees at the street. When they fall they rot no one except the wasps and insects have something from it.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I actually really appreciate the rational response to this that people have had about waste fruit, the rotting, and the food chain that follows the fallen fruit.

    I had wanted to plant a few fruit trees in my front yard and allow neighbors to just take fruit off of it. Lots of people walk up my 0.5mi dead-end road.

    But then I remembered what every PYO farm is like…tons of rotting fruits sitting at the bottom of all of them. And any apple someone picks that isn’t 100% perfect gets tossed in the pile.

    That’s a lot of maintenance. Totally doable for an individual or small group to maintain a small patch. Gets really difficult to scale up.

    • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s worth keeping in mind though, if you want to feed people: we can just do that, we have the food and we have the infrastructure. Every person going hungry in a city with edible food in bins, produce discarded for not looking right and so on is going hungry because of policy decisions.

      It is cheaper, healthier, and more successful to just distribute the food we already grow, make and transport than trying to turn everything into an orchid.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not terrible, but it’s also not great. Fruit trees by their nature produce just mountains of fruit for a single tree. I came from a large farming family and we had a few fruit trees. So much of it ends up on the ground and rotting (which, not so bad since it was in a field, a nightmare if it were in the suburbs).

      If you really want one, you NEED to maintain the tree. That means cutting branches to make sure the tree doesn’t grow up and instead grows out. It also means constant maintenance to make sure branches aren’t overloaded (growing out means they have a higher risk of breaking).

      Regular trees are already a PITA to take properly maintain, fruit trees are another level.

      And even with all that, you’ll still end up with a bunch of rotting fruit on the ground. Birds, insects, etc will nibble at your fruits. You’ll simply miss the 50 fruit the ripened early or late. It’s just going to be a headache no matter what you do.

      And it’s a lot of fruit. 1 tree can easily make enough fruit for 20 people. That comes in all at once.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those same people walk on sidewalks without going through the toll booths!

    (for US people, sidewalks are designated areas on the side of the road especially for pedestrians, or as some people say, wasted space)

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This sounded plausible until she said they poured bleach on the ground. Then it had the smell of bullshit.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Wait, why? Bleach is a common way to kill plants in the short term without any long term lingering effects in the soil since it decomposes into salt and water. With enough drainage, the salt seeps out and plants can grow again. I’d say it’s a pretty pragmatic solution to ensuring that someone doesn’t grow anything again in the short term.

      • Iapar@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        People drink bleach to avoid a life saving vaccine.

        In this parody of a world we live in I say it is not so far fetched someone would do this.

  • settxy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The park that I live next to has 3 apple trees (I’m in USA). These are not grocery store apples, they’re small and riddle with bugs, this isn’t an orchard.

    When the apples are ripe, they’ll get picked by kids and familes for a couple weeks. Nobody hordes them, nobody sees it as stealing, they’re cool, and great for the community.

    I’m just sad that they’re getting old and about to die. There used to be 5 just a couple years ago. I think they may have planted a couple new saplings, but I’m not an arborist.

    Fruit trees typically don’t live as long as other trees, that’s probably why parks and rec usually don’t plant them. Having to replace an apple tree every 25 years as opposed to a Maple, Oak, Sycamore, Pine, Elm, Cedar every 100-200+ years, kinda an easy choice. With that said, I like it, and think it’s worth. More parks should have a handful of them.

  • sketelon@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t recall the source, but I remember hearing that the Amazon, generations ago, was farmed. The trees aren’t distributed naturally, or something like that, we see signs of intentional crop management. However, it was done in a symbiotic way with nature so that it almost looks natural, until you look closer. With lots of fruit trees and food sources so that food was an abundant free resource.

    Wish I could remember the source for this, sounds like heaven on earth, working with nature is all we need to rediscover freedom.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve been told that this is a no-go for city planners because the sheer quantity of fallen fruit can be a walking hazard, and no one wants the legal liability. What it comes down to is that “free” fruit trees would require additional ongoing maintenance costs. Nothing nefarious, just logistical issues.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          As opposed to the neighborhood dogs shitting all over?

          And yeah having pollinators back would be helpful.

          Bringing nature back is a good thing.

  • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No legal advice, but I am pretty sure picking an apple from a tree in a public space (but can be privately owned) for direct consumption is legal in Germany. Weird but understandable that you need a law for that.