• Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Does the interview discuss the health issues related to obesity? That would be my only concern but it’s not my business to tell anyone that anymore than it is to tell a smoker about their cancer risks. I assume everyone knows it.

    But when you go on TV and talk about fast acceptance you have an audience of all ages and, while I’m not going to hold someone’s weight against them, I’d hope that would be discussed.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We ought to have compassion for all addicts and accept them as people however we ought not accept their addiction as normal.

      All addicts deserve help.

      • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hence why the body neutrality movement is the way to go for a gentle love approach to health through weight management, fat acceptance is a strange concept, fat isn’t healthy, why accept poor health for yourself?

        The body neutrality movement is exactly that, your physical body is neutral, no judgement for whatever size or shape it is, so just focus on improving your mind. Are you struggling with addictive tendencies around food? address that, your body will catch up to the health improvements you make for your mind.

        • klemptor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Fat acceptance people have a weird love affair with their obesity. It’s part of their personality. And I guess that makes sense - when it’s the first thing people notice about you, when it inhibits the things you can do (not just physical activity, but also basic things like fitting into a restaurant booth), when you’ve managed to convince yourself that diabetes is normal (maybe because you come from a family where everyone is fat and many of them are on diabetes meds), and when you feel that you’re being judged for whatever you eat, or for how out of breath you get just going up a flight of stairs, etc - yeah, these people become really defensive. They know they’ve eaten themselves into disability and disease, but don’t want to take responsibility for it. They don’t think they can lose the weight and they think the world should cater to their size.

          I’m not unsympathetic. In my late teens/early 20s I went through some bad shit and turned to food as a comfort. Predictably I ballooned up from a BMI of 20.5 (105 lbs) to a BMI of 34.6 (177 lbs). It was a struggle to lose that weight but I did (most of it anyway) and I’ve kept it off. At 42, I don’t expect to weigh what I did at 18 years old, for a number of reasons (a huge one is weightlifting). But I do expect to be a normal weight, be capable of strenuous physical activity, have healthy bloodwork, and be comfortable in my clothing.

          I fought against obesity and it was hard but I won. These fat acceptance folks took the other path - they leaned into it and made it a defining characteristic of their existence. It’s really sad but also frustrating because they’re choosing to continue a lifestyle that only leads to grim outcomes. They may not be able to get pregnant or safely carry to term. They may not be able to play with their pets or children. Their self-esteem will always be low. They are likely to develop skin infections due to poor hygiene. And it gets worse from there: hypertension, diabetes, certain cancers, bigger danger of breaking bones if they fall, etc etc etc. And it’s all avoidable if they could just commit to fixing the problem.

  • Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Notice that they did do that though. They didn’t force her to try to fit into a smaller box.

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What do they want us to accept? I’m willing to accept that they exist and should be allowed to be happy, and just like everyone else - that happiness should not come at the others’ expense.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      should not come at the others’ expense

      Obesity does come at everyone’s expense. Consider that over half of us Americans are obese or simply fat. Imagine the environmental impacts of all that food waste. If you don’t spend time driving the countryside, it’s hard to get your head around how much land and energy use goes into growing our food. Imagine how much pollution goes into growing that food; herbicides, pesticides, gasoline, manufacturing, chicken shit runoff, all that.

      Go to the doctor. Almost every person in the waiting room is obese. Isn’t that something? They make a huge impact on our health care system. I can’t find a local doctor taking new patients. The system is locked up and a huge part of that is treating obesity related disease and injury.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The answer is in your question. The only reason why this person is even on TV is because right wing media wanted to dunk on a fat person and get their jackass viewers yukkin it up drinking their Brawndo. It’s a shame this person got baited into basically becoming a punching bag.

      The person who created this meme thinks fat people are deserving of mockery.

    • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Probably hoping people don’t needlessly mock them on the Internet for dumb shit like landscape mode while being judged for somehow affecting others’ happiness by simply asking for some understanding?

      Just a guess, tho.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The answer is a little muddy. Some just don’t want to be picked on, some want people to accommodate their size/weight in society. IMO none of these are bad things to want.

      Where it gets messy is when people take it too far, where they push being fat not only as a lifestyle choice, but to also argue against obesity being harmful to their health.

      I’ve known a few people get into these kind of “fat acceptance” communities, and it never goes well. I don’t go into too many details, but a friend went from a fairly intelligent person to XL modelling and beauty contests (funded by them), weird social dating mixers where they get paired with what I can best describe as “people that like fat people”, and weird online groups where they align on social media messaging, bully beauty contests and model agencies for not accepting XL women, and share links online where they pick on people they seem as “fatphobic”. This woman in particular has a PhD in Human Biology, yet would spend their free time debating online about how she (easily in the high 200 lbs) is healthier than someone of average weight.

    • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      that happiness should not come at the others’ expense.

      Wdym by this — do fat people’s existence typically necessitate others’ unhappiness?

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      that happiness should not come at the others’ expense.

      It’s probably a failure of imagination, but I’ve never really understood this part of anti-acceptance sentiment.
      Any valid criticisms I’ve seen largely come down to regular old accessibility failures or capitalism making people believe airline seats should be miserably cramped.

      What is the trade off, in a real, not hypothetical sense?

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ll bite. Airlines are a great example because there are really strong physical constraints on flight, but the basic rules apply to almost every piece of built infrastructure. What does it take to make a plane “accessible” and what standards will it be built to? Are we going to accomodate “small fats” up to 300 lbs or so, or will we continue into the 500 lb range or 700 lb? This matters because aisles, seats, and doorways will all need to built to standard.

        If you’ve seen the “Big Johns” in Vegas you’ll know that the washroom alone will take up the entire width of a small passenger jet. That will allow for the oversize toilet, room to turn, the doorway and aisle. That means there will only be one unless we turn them sideways to put in two. But those toilets now remove 6-8 rows of seats. So that’s 18-24 fewer paying passengers. I could go on here but you get the idea.

        Widening the aisle would require removing 1-2 seats per row. And the remaining seats become wider so there are now 3-4 people per row instead of six. So the economics really matters here.

        These discussions are true for every piece of infrastructure. It’s not just a matter of making things bigger to allow people room to move and sit. Every supporting piece of infrastructure has to match. What does it do to land use if parking spaces need to be 50% wider to accomodate larger vehicle doors that swing fully open?

        The built environment is a series of interdependent systems that are built to a set of standards - some tightly regulated and some informal. Changing those to accomodate a larger body size is not a simple task.

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        When I pay my healthcare premiums or my taxes, individuals who are obese are taking more of that money and raising prices overall (everything else equal, not getting into universal healthcare vs not). That is a trade off of me being okay with the notion that people should be covered, but having to pay more for those people.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          So are the old, children, and anyone not within the “best for capitalism” bell curve (which I just made up, but you get the sentiment).

          That’s basically a pro-capitalist argument used to justify a system which should not exist in the first place.
          If we’re discussing our thoughts of what should be, then I believe healthcare should be a function of government and a human right.

          • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I agree. But weight is a health issue. So providing them health care equally to all other citizens is very different than altering society to accommodate them unduly. If we’re using airplanes as an example, we shouldn’t put “fat rows” into airplanes any more than we should bring back ashtrays on airplanes.

            Supporting something as a health issue, and catering to it, are two very different things.

            It’s sad that we live in a world where the old show “scared straight” would get sued because it was hurting the kids 'fee-fees. The health care system can’t tell them they’re obese and have to do something about it because it makes them feel bad…fuck that.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Even with universal nationalized healthcare, in a non capitalist place, the cost is still happening

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Health insurance is a scam when it gets to decide what treatment you’re allowed to have.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Nope, I don’t accept them. I mean come on, a drug addicted person isn’t accepted, too. Everyone would say: “stop it, your lifestyle kills you and makes your family and friends sad.”

      And fat people get accepted? Like: “oh it’s okay, eat more till you die, I don’t care.”

      This isn’t correct. Blame your fattys and tell them they have to change their life. It’s a slow suicide, and they need help.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You’re angry. Calm down.

        So like that? Did it work? Are you calmed down yet?

        Here I’ll try spewing more abuse at you targeting this hostile emotion you’re clearly addicted to . Maybe that will calm you down. But I dunno, it doesn’t seem like it should be the one and only tool in the toolbox to reach for when talking to people about their issues.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Alcoholism is a disease, but it’s the only one you can get yelled at for having. “Goddamn it Otto, you are an alcoholic.” “Goddamn it Otto, you have Lupus.” One of those two doesn’t sound right.

          - Mitch Hedberg

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Both aren’t things that came from uncontrolled misuse of substances or food. Bad examples if you ask me.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Oh yes, I agree. And it’s only coincidental that I dropped 40 lbs without trying when I got on non-stimulant ADHD meds. Mental health and physical health are unrelated. It’s really just they eat too much and totally within their control.

            • Samsy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              ADHD meds? What are they doing? Lowering the ADHD? Well shit, if I take meds that lowers my “drive” I would get fat, too.

              I don’t want to start a discussion about ADHD but maybe it is to decide what could kill you more. They say even Mozart had theoretically ADHD, but they don’t gave him meds, they gave him a Piano.

              • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                ADHD causes executive dysfunction. You don’t get to choose what you’re doing.

                If that sounds crazy, that’s because it is. That’s why it’s a neurological disorder.

                ADHD meds give you more executive function. You get to choose what you do.

                Maybe Mozart would’ve been happier if he hyper fixated on harpsichord less and showered more. If he was ADHD, he didn’t get to make that choice.

                But regardless, Mozart wouldn’t survive today’s society with a harpsichord fixation. At best he’d be in a mediocre band. At worst he’d be homeless. If you aren’t comfortable with that concept, then maybe we need to fix society.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 hours ago

              More than 40% of the USA alone is obese. No where near that many people are obese because they are taking stimulant ADHD meds. It’s great that you lost weight, but a very massive portion of our population is obese because of their eating habits and sedentary lifestyle.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Of course they don’t. What do you think you’re proving? I think the world is more complicated than you imagine

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No, you’re getting downvoted because there is no such thing as “genetically fat”. Metabolic disorders are a different beast, but even those can be controlled by diet. The psychological tradeoffs of restrictive diets make them a difficult choice for many people who prefer a pharmaceutical route instead. At the fringe people will deny there is a “lifestyle” intervention option at all.

          • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Brotha waattttt?

            If your genetics give you an abnormally slow metabolism, this will result in you gaining weight based off calories that a normal person would eat to maintain a healthy weight. It’s hard enough for most people with normal metabolisms to eat a healthy diet so saying “well those people can just control it with diet” is grossly optimistic and again puts the “blame” on these people with metabolic disorders for not eating well enough.

            You did mention though that those people may go the pharmaceutical route, however that may not be available to a lot of people due to lack of health insurance, lack of knowledge, etc.

            So to come full circle, yes, some people are fat because of genetics.

            To be fair, this is a very small subset of people we’re talking about.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Nobody’s genetically landwhale or ham planet. We’re taking people who need landscape tv coverage, not a few pounds extra.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Actually they are. Health problems are no joke. I knew a guy at a military-adjacent youth group. Dude’s nickname was Garcia. He had health issues that made him look basically like a ball. But he worked out, he was active and ate well - meaning he was in better shape than me. Sometimes you just lose the genetic lottery.

            • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I’m curious if you know anything more about this condition so I can learn about it. If I’m understanding right, it made him seem fat but it wasn’t fat, right? Otherwise it seems to break my understating that it’s physically impossible to not overeat and yet still get fat

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 hours ago

                No, he was fat. He probably was overeating for his metabolism, but the issue was he had a really really slow one. I for instance in my youth days could devour two huge burgers, same as a coworker that was 30cm higher than me and extremely muscular, but I was a stick cause my metabolism was fast and with a little bit of excercise (rollerblading to work, 2km one way each day) I kept fit. When hormonal issues pop up you can put on weight incredibly fast. Google hypothyroidism for instance.

                Under the fat, you could be extremely fit - for example sumo wrestlers are in the best form of their lives, despite the excessive weight. Sometimes you are just fucked no matter what you do.

                • Randelung@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Nobody says you can’t be fit under the fat, but fat people are overeating - period. The fat itself is a problem, it releases harmful hormones and impedes functionality of the organs it surrounds, not to mention the issues for circulation.

            • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 hours ago

              My comment about genetic disorders was downvoted. People here must hate fat people so much that they cannot accept that a small fraction of fat people have genetic disorders and are not fat due to any fault of their own. But hey, fuck em, amirite?

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Why do you care about downvotes, they are imaginary points from people you never met and most likely won’t ever talk to since 95% of people are lurkers

                • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  Very true, but it still sets the tone for the community and the platform as a whole. If factual information on Lemmy is always downvoted then it makes Lemmy look like a misinformation engine, no better than the other bullshit platforms that have gone to shit. Lemmy is a platform that is trying to grow. Why would people join it if it comes off as toxic?

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You have to consider that this is, in some cases, issue of mental health, money, or education.
        Garbage foods are the ones most readily available, and health care much less so.

        That obviously doesn’t apply to the person going on tv to promote this lifestyle

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes, it’s often education. And that’s something more educated people can help, too.

          The promoting person could be some kind of mentally illness. Our brain loves to lie about facts that could hurt us.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Sure, but according to this here memo

          ahem

          “Fuck the mentally ill”
          - every society

          • picnicolas@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Overeating, drug addiction, even workaholism and endless accumulation of wealth are all maladaptive coping mechanisms due to unintegrated trauma.

  • obscur_e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Reminds me of Fifteen Million Merits episode of Black Mirror where they run show on screens for workers making fun of overweight people