• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t even understand why anyone cares about winamp anymore. Or how the company figured people should be happy to work for free on it without it being open source.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    LOL. Those 3 weeks must have been really exciting at Llama Group. I can only imagine how the conversion went when the engineers tried to explain what FOSS means and the CEO understood none of it.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They wanted free labor but own the changes.

      They could have gotten free labor if they used a standard license like GPL or even MIT.

      But nope. They were greedy.

  • fulg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I thought I read elsewhere there were some GPL 2 parts in there too, I guess not.

    I tried to find a source for this more credible than “I remember reading it on Lemmy” but couldn’t, now that the repo is deleted nobody can confirm. Perhaps some forks still exist… 🤔

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Perhaps some forks still exist…

      No, that’s impossible, because they didn’t allow it 😭

      • Scoopta
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        According to the article they did allow it. They got rid of that clause in a license update, just didn’t allow you to modify your fork lol