Official statement regarding recent Greg’ commit 6e90b675cf942e from Serge Semin

Hello Linux-kernel community,

I am sure you have already heard the news caused by the recent Greg’ commit 6e90b675cf942e (“MAINTAINERS: Remove some entries due to various compliance requirements.”). As you may have noticed the change concerned some of the Ru-related developers removal from the list of the official kernel maintainers, including me.

The community members rightly noted that the quite short commit log contained very vague terms with no explicit change justification. No matter how hard I tried to get more details about the reason, alas the senior maintainer I was discussing the matter with haven’t given an explanation to what compliance requirements that was. I won’t cite the exact emails text since it was a private messaging, but the key words are “sanctions”, “sorry”, “nothing I can do”, “talk to your (company) lawyer”… I can’t say for all the guys affected by the change, but my work for the community has been purely volunteer for more than a year now (and less than half of it had been payable before that). For that reason I have no any (company) lawyer to talk to, and honestly after the way the patch has been merged in I don’t really want to now. Silently, behind everyone’s back, bypassing the standard patch-review process, with no affected developers/subsystem notified - it’s indeed the worse way to do what has been done. No gratitude, no credits to the developers for all these years of the devoted work for the community. No matter the reason of the situation but haven’t we deserved more than that? Adding to the GREDITS file at least, no?..

I can’t believe the kernel senior maintainers didn’t consider that the patch wouldn’t go unnoticed, and the situation might get out of control with unpredictable results for the community, if not straight away then in the middle or long term perspective. I am sure there have been plenty ways to solve the problem less harmfully, but they decided to take the easiest path. Alas what’s done is done. A bifurcation point slightly initiated a year ago has just been fully implemented. The reason of the situation is obviously in the political ground which in this case surely shatters a basement the community has been built on in the first place. If so then God knows what might be next (who else might be sanctioned…), but the implemented move clearly sends a bad signal to the Linux community new comers, to the already working volunteers and hobbyists like me.

Thus even if it was still possible for me to send patches or perform some reviews, after what has been done my motivation to do that as a volunteer has simply vanished. (I might be doing a commercial upstreaming in future though). But before saying goodbye I’d like to express my gratitude to all the community members I have been lucky to work with during all these years.

  • Matty_r
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Honestly must be incredibly stressful managing a project like the Linux kernel. Governments constantly wanting changes made for their own purposes, companies leeching off the work of volunteers, neck beards losing their minds over some change they don’t like.

    I don’t envy them at all. This sort of change was inevitability going to piss people off - it could have been handled better but I think it was going to be lose/lose no matter which way it was done.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I personally think this is a cop out. Obviously people would have been outraged either way, but personally my only issue is about how it was done. The whole point of the FOSS community is openness and transparency. The senior maintainers of arguably the most important FOSS project trying to operate secretively on something like this has shattered my trust in them, as well as many others.

  • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s ridiculous how some see nothing wrong with delisting maintainers and are genuinely happy about such discrimination.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not ridiculous. Majority of U.S propaganda is based on dehumanising people.

      Also I read somewhere that this ban only applies to folk that work in companies that are sanctioned. So might not be straight up racism.

      But I do agree with you. Who tf is U.S to sanction others while it’s formed on a genocide and still committing another one.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Later in that thread:

    Please accept all of our apologies for the way this was handled. A summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under is

    If your company is on the U.S. OFAC SDN lists, subject to an OFAC sanctions program, or owned/controlled by a company on the list, our ability to collaborate with you will be subject to restrictions, and you cannot be in the MAINTAINERS file.

    Anyone who wishes to can query the list here: https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Which is exactly what anyone who wasn’t wanting to just snort some concentrated outrage knew was the case.

      And you can argue as to if OFAC list should apply to things like this or not, but the problem is that the enforcement options for OFAC violations include ‘stomp you into the ground until you’re powder’, most people are just going to comply.

      • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Also from that thread.

        Again, we’re really sorry it’s come to this, but all of the Linux infrastructure and a lot of its maintainers are in the US and we can’t ignore the requirements of US law. We are hoping that this action alone will be sufficient to satisfy the US Treasury department in charge of sanctions and we won’t also have to remove any existing patches.

        US law CAN’T apply on foreign ground, period. Nothing can. Just because they can bully their way around that, doesn’t mean they are right.

        And it should be only fair that Israeli maintainers be removed as well.

        They should also rethink their infrastructure policy and whether they still want it on US soil.

        This is all wishful thinking, I know, but this just goes to show you how they have absolutely no backbone whatsoever. As if anybody is gonna touch the Linux kernel and jeopardize the safety of millions of systems. We all know that is never going to happen, but they still bent over for the US… so typical… just goes to show you how little backbone everyone has, including Linus.

        Oh, and don’t get me started on the Russia/Finland history comment…

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          If the company is in the USA they can restrict who you colloborate with. They also can control what you export as a oftware product under ITAR/EAR rules. It is why when some encryotion work had to be done the devs crossed the border into Canada to work on development, because under USA law encryption code is a controlled export product even if opensource

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      21 hours ago

      But folks who work for US companies building weapons for Israel are totes okay?

      It’s honestly fucking wild that an internationally developed open source project has to play by the US government’s rules when the US government is out here helping commit genocide right the fuck now.

      Like, look in the fucking mirror on this why don’t you.

      Maybe the better rule is that if you work for a company that produces weaponry for war you shouldn’t be allowed to contribute, period.

      • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Maybe the better rule is that if you work for a company that produces weaponry for war you shouldn’t be allowed to contribute, period.

        This is something I can actually get behind on.

        But, you see, there is just one teeency weeency tiny problem with that. They spend trucks of cash on whatever they deem will give them what they want, including funding organizations that they profit from.

      • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Wow, I didn’t know that being a Linux/open source contributor meant you don’t have to follow your country’s laws.

        It’s developed internationally but devs still reside somewhere and have to abide by the rules at that place. Linux in this case being represented by an US entity means they have to follow the gov’s sanctions. If you want more or less of those, that’s where (the government) you act.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You may be amazed to learn that there aren’t many international sanctions against the USA at this time, but I imagine you could probably get into legal trouble for collaborating with Americans if you’re in, I don’t know, North Korea maybe.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You may be amazed to learn that the reason there aren’t many international sanctions against the USA at this time is not because the USA is a beacon of peace, freedom, democracy, and national sovereignty. Because the US is very much not that.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s crazy how the US Treasury isn’t sanctioning companies for working on US government approved contracts. /s

              • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                U.S. law requires the government to cut off weapons shipments to countries that prevent the delivery of U.S.-backed humanitarian aid. Israel has been largely dependent on American bombs and other weapons in Gaza since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Yes and? You keep arguing against things I’m not saying.

                  I’d be perfectly happy if we told Bibi to fuck off. But the US government isn’t going to impose sanctions on itself.

              • actually@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                17 hours ago

                The genocide has such wide support in the USA community and defense companies ( irregardless of the louder minority of people protesting it)

                That if there were justice, then many other people and organizations would have similar treatment and be kicked

                We can’t get away from politics, or limits, but if I will point out the hypocrisy

          • kbal@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Address your complaints to the government of the USA. Or, if you have the right to do so, cast a vote in the upcoming election there to prevent it taking a big step in the opposite direction from a world in which it might consider anything like similar sanctions against Israel.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              “Write a stern letter to a foreign government” and “Vote against ‘very probable 101% genocide’ and for ‘proven 100% genocide’” are some weak tea, and beside the point being made.

              • kbal@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Your particular complaints are better addressed to almighty God I suppose. So long as you don’t blame linux kernel devs for them it’s all the same to me.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It sucks if well meaning people are caught up in this, but it also sucks if you’re living in the aggressor state of an ongoing war.

  • Korkki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Are they legally bound to follow any sanction list in their dealings? If so Linux foundation should consider move out of the US jurisdiction, because the santion load is just going to increase and more countries will be included.

    If they are just doing this because of a political fad and partaking “the current thing” then they are just voluntarily digging their own and the linux foundation’s grave.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Linus chose to move to the US as well to become a US citizen.

      To be fair he never claimed to be an idealist.

      Also he is anti Russian himself as he made clear in his first comment in the thread. So being forced to remove them is probably a bonus for him.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Where should they move to? Countries that aren’t sanctioning Russia right now are likely to be… problematic? in other ways. But I am also pretty ignorant about which countries are on that list, and I would like to know more.

      Maybe they need to become pirates on international water…

    • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      because the santion load is just going to increase and more countries will be included.

      Not to mention more stupid shit, like not being able to visit the US if your wife is Russian, cuz… you know, you might be a spy.

      If they are just doing this because of a political fad and partaking “the current thing” then they are just voluntarily digging their own and the linux foundation’s grave.

      My 2 cents. Nobody is asking them to do anything… yet… and they probably never will, but… they’re scared shitless and they would rather comply, even for things no one is asking of them yet and is dubious whether or not they’re even covered by the sanctions, than show some backbone.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Are we going to remove Israel maintainers from the list since IDF soldiers are using Palestinians as human shields?

      Oh, no, because US is okay with that genocide?

      It’s really more about how clearly fucking hypocritical it is.

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        So you think they’re against the invasion of Ukraine, and would like to see Israel hit with sanctions as well?

        Because that wasn’t the impression I was getting.

        I think we can all agree that what Russia and Israel are doing is horrific. Israel should be sanctioned as well, rather than letting Russia off…

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          That’s literally what I suggested elsewhere here: If you work for ANY company in ANY country that produces weapons for war for ANY government, that they shouldn’t be allowed to contribute.

          Because that at the very least would be consistent.

          • li10@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Wouldn’t that stop nearly every country from being able to contribute?

            Sounds like a convoluted way of saying to just let the Russians off, veiled as some over the top “consistency” argument.

            Maybe let’s do that tho, and just start with Russia 😆

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Way to purposefully misread it.

              The whole issue is that the Russians work for companies with sanctions against them.

              So, treat all companies involved in war the same way, and you’ll never run into this hypocritical issue again.

              There’s plenty of companies (like Valve) who don’t directly produce weapons of war or have contracts with their governments for war-services who contribute to Linux that could still do so, and plenty of individuals who don’t work for military and military adjacent companies to contribute.

              Acting like removing people who work at companies that contribute to wars will mean no one can contribute is obviously a grossly exaggerated misinterpretation.

              • li10@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                That’s not completely unreasonable tbh, but I still think the current sanctions are fair if not perfect.

                I didn’t purposely misread, this part was just a bit unclear:

                If you work for ANY company in ANY country that produces weapons for war

              • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Funnily enough, the steam deck has been used during the conflict to control remote weapons. So they could be implicated in this if you go far enough

                • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  You could use a knife to kill someone as well… hell, an umbrella as well.

              • schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Google or Microsoft employees wouldn’t be able to contribute, even if they’re not working with any weapons manufacturer during their entire career there.

                The idea is great in theory but isn’t in feasible in rl.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You’re saying it like they have a choice.

      Besides, stuff like this should not be constrained by the boundaries of nationalities.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Smart dude. He knows exactly why. To pretend that he doesn’t is a sham. This whole “I don’t know whyyyyyy” face he’s put on is an absolute facade.

    • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In all honesty, I’m fairly certain at the very moment he found out about it, he was puzzled. But, after reading 10 other Russians got removed as well, I’m fairly certain he knew, but wanted proof and closure. I would like both as well to be honest.

    • 0x4E4F@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It still boggles my mind why Israeli maintainers are still in the kernel 🤯.

      Next up, maintainers with red pubic hair.

    • Korkki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      What pisses me off the most about NAFOids is the absolute and constant pettiness.