At least in my dialect/accent of English

  • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most “silent” letters have some effect on the pronunciation of the word. They aren’t there for no reason.

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    The oddities of the English language will lead you down a strange and fascinating historical rabbit hole. It’s great reading, but be ready to spend some time.

    • xoggy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I would highly recommend the History of English Podcast. This particular observation made by OP is thoroughly covered in this particular episode: https://youtu.be/T0ED-FV7O50

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      tl;dr once upon a time everyone spelled words guided only by vibes, then spelling was standardised-ish, then after that there was a great vowel shift where the now standard-ish spelling became less intuitive. add the linguistic influence from French and latin (sprinkle in some germanic & a pinch of skandinavian), add the power balance between classes favouring fancier words (the nobles ate pork, beef, poultry, the peasants tended to pigs, cows, chickens). add some more stuff and there you go! a “functional” language of Anglonic Britonic English!

      • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Also, the first printing presses that came to England were accompanied by Dutch type setters. They sometimes made spellings more Dutch (changing gost to ghost for example). They were also paid by the line, so would occasionally add unnecessary letters to words.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re not silent letters, they’re modifiers. They modify the sound of surrounding letters. An example of a silent letter would be the P in psychology (in the English language only).

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember seeing a standup comedian late 80s or early 90s refer to ghoti as an alternate spelling for fish. Just looked it up, and it dates back to the 19th century.

    You take the sound gh makes in laugh, the sound of o in women, and the to from dictionary. F-I-SH.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Similar to this:

    The french word for squirrel (écureuil) is equally hard for English speakers to pronounce as the English word is for French speakers

    (I would also add that most English words with two R’s are hard for French speakers; mirror, error and the like)

    • ValiantDust@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The German word for squirrel (Eichhörnchen) is hard to pronounce for French and English speakers in different ways.

      Though I have to admit squirrel/écureuil is the cooler pair because it seems to me they both derive from the same root but divererged in a way to make them difficult to pronounce for the other one.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be fair, Eichhörnchen and écureuil seem to have a similar root as well even though French is a Latin language and German is not

    • ALERT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      it’s funny how I as a Ukrainian can easily clearly pronounce both English and French variants, while my language is from even a different language group :D

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They aren’t silent, they make a faint gutteral sound, like the back of your tongue is being forced down. It’s barely pronounced in English, but it changes the way the vowels sound. It’s more present in German and Dutch languages.

    For shits and giggles, I always slightly pronounce it when reading any tragedeigh names. Your daughter is named Breighleigh? Are you part Klingon?

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think I’ve ever heard it pronounced the way you’re describing. I know the sound you mean. Another language that I’m learning and which is influential on place names here has it. I just don’t think I’ve ever heard it used in the English word “ought”. Which dialects of English do you have in mind?

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t you pronounce “ought” like awt, with the back of your tongue pressed back in your mouth? Make that “ough” sound, and then a “g” sound. It should almost feel like your gagging. That tongue position is there for most words that use the “gh” phoneme. Sometimes you add an “f” sound because speakers didn’t know how to make the precise sound without gagging, like “cough.” That’s the remnant of the abandoned glottal fricative.

        Ok now be honest, have you been sitting by yourself making “awgh” sounds? Gold star if you felt like vomiting at some point.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          For me it’s just a vowel sound and a T consonant on the end, the tongue isn’t closing the airway enough to approach a consonant on the vowel sound. The restriction is at the back of the mouth, but it certainly doesn’t feel like gagging

          A glottal fricative is the consonant at the start of “happy” or “hello”. The gh I’m thinking of is a voiced velar fricative. The voiced counterpart to the ch in Scottish English “loch” or the German “Buch”

          Ok now be honest, have you been sitting by yourself making “awgh” sounds?

          Well of course! Few things make me so grateful to live alone as any time I’m trying to figure out the specifics of how I say a thing

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Enough rhymes with buff Through with do Thorough with… Actually very little in my accent. Burqa, maybe? The last syllable has a schwa vowel for me Plough with cow Though with crow Hiccough with cup Trough with scoff Hough with frock

      (for me)

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depending on where you live, thorough is pronounced “thur-oh” and hiccough is spelled “hiccup”.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ahh, yes! I had meant to add something like “in my English” but then I get so thrown off by bei g unable to think of a rhyme for “thorough” that I forgot

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re only permitted to have one primary address. If you want a second address you’ll have to call support.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      We could have if things were a little different. I’m not sure about Old Norse nor Old English, but Modern German does change Haus to Häuser (that äu is pronounced kinda like ‘oi’) and presumably it was quite similar in (at least some varieties of) Old English.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Here’s a fun (related) one. I don’t know to whom to attribute it. I got it from a colleague in grad school.

    Ghoti

    What does it spell? The English spelling system is so screwy, you can make a decent case that it spells “fish”.

    Gh – from enough (f)

    o – from women (i)

    ti – from nation (sh)

    Edit: spacing and one addition

  • kn0wmad1c
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because it’s the ugh that provides the short vowel sound, not just the gh

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m sure that’s a regional way to pronounce it. I’ve lived in the south (North Carolina) my whole life and I’ve always heard and pronounced it as the same sound as caught, or aught.

    In fact, according to The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, both aught and ought have the same pronunciation.

    • chuymatt@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Weird. It may sound subtle ( another weird word), but my mouth is definitely doing different things. Ought has a definite diphthong whereas aught may have one, but much more slight and with a more closed mouth.

      Languages are weird.

      Edit: aught is likely grown out of naught! I mean, that obviously makes sense, just never actually thought about it.

    • tyler
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re saying ought is pronounced aught, not out, even though the gh is silent. If the g h was just silent then ought and out would be pronounced the same, so clearly the silent letters are doing something else

  • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Do you want ought? - Do you want anything?

    Is sometimes pronounced very similarly to “do you want out”? I’d spell it ‘ought’, but I’ve seen ‘aught’.