• adr1an
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The only ads we cannot block. Good for them, I guess…

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      What encryption? There is no E2EE by default. It’s all plaintext.

    • pgetsos@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The encryption is not Trust me bro. It is public and tested multiple times. For example an analysis back in 2021:

      https://mtpsym.github.io/

      It found somes issues in the implementation of MTProto 2.0 from the official apps, with only one of them being actually usable as an attack vector, and they were all fixed before the disclosure of the analysis. They found no issues with the encryption algorithm other than some choices that may make the implementation of it harder

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        The encryption that only works in one-on-one chats? The encryption that’s multiple menus deep in said one-on-one chats? The encryption that no one uses because of the issues above?

          • adr1an
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s actually a perk. Means the decryption key is not uploaded to telegram servers.

            And, yes. The encryption all of the normies learnt to use for buying illegal goods while the prices were posted in wide open group chats. At least that’s how it was working in latin america with drugs.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              That’s actually a perk. Means the decryption key is not uploaded to telegram servers.

              You could make encryption work between multiple ends without the server having to share the keys if each device has its own key - like in Matrix, XMPP, etc. And given that Telegram can’t do that, the restriction in question is still very arbitrary - in a one-to-one conversation, they just don’t allow you to make your end the desktop and not the phone.

              Also yes, here selling drugs over Telegram is a very big thing too and given how hard it is to use Telegram anonymously and safely - it is indeed monumentally stupid.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I exclusively use it for public chats, like I did IRC.

      Neither had any encryption and I have no issue with it.

  • blackfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is kind of good news it means there is still a major alt to WhatsApp. Still my second to last app but it does have a lot of linux groups on there

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes but that doesn’t mean they’re not important in ensuring there isn’t a messaging monopoly.

        Obviously in an ideal world we’d have multiple interconnected secure apps with some cross-platform interoperability, but until then I’ll settle for one government/corporation not having all of everyone’s private conversations.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If Telegram is backdoored, not for Russia. While the founder and owner is Russian, him and the company left Russia in 2014 when they didn’t want to comply with their regime (I think. Don’t remember the details). The company is based in Dubai since 2017.

        • akkajdh999
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Why is Telegram the only messenger that is not banned in Russia? Signal, Matrix, SimpleX, WhatsApp, Viber, everything, are all banned, but not Telegram

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Where did you get the info? Signal and Viber are indeed blocked but usable via VPNs that a lot of people have anyway. Whatsapp was never even attempted to be blocked and remains absolutely dominant together with Telegram. Matrix is a protocol rather than a platform so can’t really be blocked, but even matrix.org was never blocked either. Simplex was blocked a while ago, but again, it is a protocol, so they could only block the central servers and apparently port 5223 too. But both were quietly unblocked a short time after, no idea why.

            • akkajdh999
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Doesn’t matter if something “cannot be blocked and is still usable”, the point is that they WANT it blocked. They want to block everything except Telegram. There was one magical moment when they stopped a big war with Durov and decided that they don’t want it banned anymore, and it will be the only free platform in Russia. What happened? :)

              Ok, maybe the ban of Matrix servers was in my dreams (or was blocked for a short time for some people), but everything else was not. Yeah, apparently WhatsApp is not blocked yet, but they are threatening to do it (it’s too widespread I guess).

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Yeah, Matrix is possible I guess but I’ve seen ZERO news on that. You might be confusing it with Simplex, which was blocked for a very short time but silently went back to being fully operational. Not heard any plans for Whatsapp either.

                By the way, I am also 100% convinced Telegram is actively cooperating with them. Not sure if the “blocking” was theater from the beginning or just incompetence, but the result is the same. I think there were many cases when Telegram took down undesired channels at least, and I believe it was confirmed it helped with “investigations”.

    • pgetsos@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Along with the premium version, they have a crypto currency (TON) that can be used to buy things on the platform from other users, and I think you can also buy things with real money and they keep a small commission. Also there are some small ads in very large channels (not groups, channels only) and ways to gift “stars” to other people, like Patreon or sth

      • brie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I thought TON was cancelled, and they returned the funds raised.

        Do you think the premium version covers their server costs?

    • Jiggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There is some premium version iirc. Bigger files can be sent, custom emojis, that sort of things

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Telegram always seemed a bit sus to me. I have hard time trusting that they don’t sell all that non-encrypted data somewhere.