• baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I have a Canon color laser printer which works pretty well and doesn’t pull any of this shit. They’re probably the last one standing now.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Now i had to put on the in-ears, hook up to phone to… listen to a guy talking. -_-

    Short summary: after he got a firmware update, the MFC 3750 of Louis Rossman prints in worse quality with aftermarket ink.

  • Opisek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not sure if I got the update yet, but I’m banning my printer from accessing the internet right now.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer. So if someone prints a ransom note or counterfeits cash with it, the FBI will be knocking on their door by the end of the day.

      There’s literally a certification process to be allowed to sell printers, and one of the biggest criteria for that certification is agreeing to maintain that fingerprint database. One of the other big criteria is that the printer needs to be able to recognize and refuse to print images of cash, to prevent counterfeiting. If you try to print an image of a dollar bill, the printer’s firmware will refuse to continue the print job. The issue is that this certification process also ensures there’s a de facto near duopoly on printers, which leads to BS like HP making it increasingly difficult to use affordable ink. They can be blatantly anti-consumer, because they’re protected from any competition.

      There’s a reason HP hasn’t already been priced out by some cheap Chinese competitor who is able to undercut the competition. And it’s not because of the difficulty in manufacturing or the price of components. It’s because no other companies are allowed to sell printers.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer.

        All color printers.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Inside the US, sure. That just means you don’t get the cool FOSS printer.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You make it sound like a huge conspiracy but there are laws and regulations around everything you try to sell, especially for electronics.

        You also have to do EMF radiation testing, ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes, and probably a bunch of other things to prove that your product is safe. I don’t see why the fingerprinting isn’t just another thing on the list of things you have to do to be in compliance with the rules. If your company is capable of producing something as complex as a printer, encoding the device’ serial number into a bunch of yellow microdots that you add to the printout shouldn’t be an issue.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes

          But they do? I literally got sick after i spent a day in a small room with a big office printer. And each printer makes my skin itchy, if printing in close proximity.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        May I have the legal text, of any country, requiring a certification to sell any printers, or have EURion contellation dection implemented, or legally required to implement tracking dots?

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Capitalism is the breeding ground of parasitism. The incentive structures needs to change. Good corporate governance and long term sustainability need to trump short term turnover and fiduciary role to always go up. As it exists, corporate incentive structures promote leadership by psychopaths that will go to the utmost consequence to drive the last cent out of their customers. This is especially true in the US, which by virtue of competition, metastasises to the entire western world.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Its been doing that for 50+ years. But just like how capitalism expects growth, the trend is exponential.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Go with a bottle printer, or at least a laser and get a standalone scanner for USB. Cartridges suck, literally, all-in-ones even moreso.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Bröther, please dö nöt becöme anti-cönsümer!”

    “I töö yearn för the cöntrölled mönöpöly, thë ensittificätiön, the röt ecönömy!”

    “Brother…”

    “I’m leäving töö müch möney on thë täblë! We also hävë öür men Ëlön Müsk as thë shädöw prësidënt, Trümp ïs jüst hïs, ör räthër - öür püppët. Hë wïll dïsmänlë äll cönsümër prötëctïons, as thëy’re in thë wäy öf öür pröfits.”

    “Bröthër… Plëäsë rëcönsïdër!”

    “Änd whät ärë yöü gönnä dö if not? Go tö thë cönsümer prötection agencies Ëlön Müsk’s DÖGË jüst dïsmäntlëd? Üse an öld HP LaserJet until yöü cän get repläcemënt rollers för it? You know öther parts öf it cän brëäk töö.”

    “Bröther… You became… ËVÏL! You betrayed EVERYTHING you previously stood for!”

    “And Ï wïll dö it as mäny tïmes as nëëded. Ëvil? It’s jüst büsïnëss. Mäybë yöü shöüld hävë rëcönsïdërëd yöür vötë för Trümp.”

    “Bröther… Büt thë tränsës hävë cäncëlled Pikamëë för thë wïzärd gämë! The wökenëss häve been deströying the gäme ïndüstry! I nëëded tö vötë för Dönäld Trümp! Why isn’t it wörkïng äs ït wäs süppösëd tö!”

    “Yöü vötëd ägäïnst yöür cläss interest öut öf püre hatred. I like ït vërÿ müch! Yöü knöw önë rëäsön she wäs älsö cäncelled wäs düë tö lölï? Ï dön’t think Pröjëct 2025 wïll ällöw it för sö löng düë tö tötäl pörn ban!”

    “PLEÄSE BRÖTHËR, NÖT THE LÖLÏ! PLEÄSE LET ME KEEP THË CÜTË ÄND FÜNNŸ!”

    “Yöü vöted against yöür class interest, yöür personal interest… hahahahahaHAAHAHAHAHAAAA! Yöür sö fünny! Ÿöü’rë thë përfëct vötër för më! Ÿöü’rë thë përfëct cönsümër ëvën! Töö dümb tö rëälïzë äll thë pöliticäl wörkings aröünd yöürself. Änd when anything göes wröng, yöü bläme the minörities öf this söciety. Nöw get exited för Bröther AI, a sübscriptiön service which is essentiäl för öperating the printer! Get ready för price hikes! Get ready för shörter lasting printers!”

    “You’re truly despicable bröther!”

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s funny how far ahead 3d printers are in terms of consumer experience, everything is open, everything works and the tech is like 300 times more complex.

    2D printer companies should be shamed to death.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      2D printers used to be like this.
      They all worked with open, universal drivers, no additional software, and any ink cartridge that fit inside the bay.
      But then companies figured out that people will just buy the cheapest printer on offer, regardless of everything else.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Over time as 3D printers go from tinkerer’s toy to household staple, I’d expect them to become more locked down and anti-consumer.

      • CandleTiger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Bambu is working on it already — can’t print unless you’re connected to the internet and send your files through their server, can’t connect to the printer with other slicers besides their slicer.

        They had to walk that back some; there is now a “developer mode” where old standard functionality is still exposed, but they’re clearly working as hard as they can to turn it shitty.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They would have to become sci-fi level capable before they would be considered household staple items.

    • paf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is mainly because consumer 3d printer have been developped by 3d printing enthusiast first and not a company, Prusa which was leader for some time used a lot of open sources project to build their printers. As it’s getting mainstream as time goes by more and more companies shows up with closed sources project sadly.

      • XNX@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Isn’t prusa now doing anti consumer / closed source stuff?

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Aren’t you confusing them with Bambu?

          Their slicer is based on Prusa’s exactly because Prusa isn’t doing closed source.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Don’t worry. Companies like Bambu and others are trying to lock down shift their printer business in the style of 2d printer companies. I hope it at least happens very slowly, but the enshittification is happening…

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 minutes ago

      Has anyone figured out how to 3d print a 2d printer yet?

      Edit: actually, scratch that entirely. How difficult do you suppose it would be to create an aftermarket non-malicious logic board to drive the hardware in lieu of the malicious OEM board? After all, it’s not the cartridges refusing to print.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There is a piece of software which will take a word document and convert it into an embossed 3D print file. So you could always just skip the middleman and 3D print yourself a plaque version of your document instead.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I no longer have any corporate relationships that aren’t either apprehensive, strained, or downright antagonistic.

    It’s us versus them now and they’ve give their last shits. It’s feeling like every company is a cable company now.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have VERY few and I cherish them.

      Fairphone feels great to me. I think My coffee stuff is the same (Profitec, Eureka Mignon); no app or wifi or anything, fairly available spare parts.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          Sure did. Repairable ones. I strongly prefer wired headphones and will keep using them as I can, and I ain’t buying earbuds.

          But I’d rather not let perfect be the enemy of good. I am not giving up a cellphone, so I’d rather have Fairphone trying (ans sometimes fucking it up) than give my money to anyone else in the market.

          Them not being perfect in my eyes doesn’t qualify as a hostile relationship between their corporation and me.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Always has been like that.

      Not one single corporation is your friend or wants to be. All they want is your money. No exceptions.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Companies were never our friends, but it used to be the case that companies sold products. They sold a product and you got to use it and that was the end of it.

        Now instead, thanks largely to the Internet, companies barely care about ‘product’ at all and instead are all trying to get in on that gravy train of monetised data slurping, subscription models, DRM on every consumable, firmware updates that change the terms on you after the fact, and so on. Every electronic thing in your home is now super hostile to you.

        TVs, printers, fridges. These products used to be just products, but now they are trojan horses.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This shift in business model also means a drop in customer service. They used to sell you a product and stand behind it because eventually they wanted you to choose them when you needed a new or different product. Now that they have you roped in via a sort of forced dependency, they don’t have to pretend to be nice to you even.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            Exactly. The way to make money pre-Internet was “generate repeat business” and the way to do that was to create a product and service the customer was happy with.

            The way to make money now is to get the customer trapped, then pump them as hard as possible.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve always promoted commercial inktank printers for people who do a lot of printing, and people always mentioned Brother as a response, but tbh I’ve never really hopped on the bandwagon to shill for any particular company.

    Just a good commercial inktank printer. A regular printer with all the bells and whistles is going to cost you like $100 and $45 for each ink pack you buy, you might as well just spend $450 on a printer, write it off as home office expense, and call it good.