• butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s true, but i don’t know if it’s fair to say that mandating employee ownership is anything other than socialist. Not Marxist, sure. Certainly leftist. But isn’t employee ownership and governance of the means of production, by definition, socialism?

        • geissi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Socialism has other elements

          I think your argument might be more convincing if you actually mentioned these elements.

          Marx did not think it was socialism

          Other people had other definitions even before Marx, so I’m not sure why his should be the only valid definition.

          Just my two cents.

        • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ah I see. I definitely have more learning to do than. In that case how is libertarian socialism socialism? Doesn’t that definition invalidate basically everything but vanguardism?

            • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh I definitely think my position is more informed by anarchist traditions (eg, see my username lol) than socialist traditions, but it’s not exactly anarchism either. I’m never really sure what label to use tbh.